精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清,国产精品成人久久久久,国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍

????一群百萬富翁聚在一起，斤斤計較地抱怨收入的細(xì)微變化時，沒有一個人的姿勢是漂亮的。NBA球員工會與球隊老板本月爆發(fā)的最新一輪混戰(zhàn)，就是一個很好的例子。

????雙方的談判實際上已經(jīng)嘟嘟囔囔地延續(xù)了大約兩年半了。老板們一直在想著法子增加球隊的利潤——他們說，有些球隊是賠錢的買賣。雙方已經(jīng)在如何分割收入等財務(wù)細(xì)節(jié)上你來我往地爭執(zhí)了好幾個回合。上周一，由律師代表的球員們拒絕接受代表聯(lián)盟球隊老板的NBA總裁大衛(wèi)?斯特恩提出的一項協(xié)議。如何分配球員工資是雙方產(chǎn)生分歧的另一個焦點問題。老板們希望建立更嚴(yán)格的工資上限規(guī)則；球員當(dāng)然不愿意。

????這些障礙促使球員和老板雙方都采取了法律行動，從而有可能使NBA陷入訴訟風(fēng)暴，報銷2011-2012整個賽季。上周，球員們已經(jīng)錯過了本賽季的第一張薪金支票，每少打一場比賽，他們都將損失一筆錢。老板們同樣也會賠錢，但許多老板仍然在咬牙堅持，要求達成更有利的協(xié)議，以便更好地保護其球隊盈利水平。

????盡管這次停擺事件涉及許多憤怒的富翁，但肯定需要一個出頭的人。有鑒于此，“大衛(wèi)?斯特恩最終將成為替罪羊。”明尼蘇達州大學(xué)的體育管理學(xué)教授斯蒂芬?羅斯說。

????斯特恩在沖突中為球隊老板代言畢竟是他應(yīng)盡的本份。但這位NBA總裁（他拒絕接受本文作者采訪）在引導(dǎo)這次談判期間犯了幾個重大錯誤。路易斯安那州立大學(xué)（Louisiana State University）運動學(xué)系的體育管理專家乍得?塞弗里德認(rèn)為，這些失誤令人遺憾。“因為人們說起大衛(wèi)?斯特恩的遺產(chǎn)，肯定認(rèn)為他是職業(yè)體育史上最偉大的總裁之一，”他說。

????斯特恩擔(dān)任NBA總裁的時間已接近30年，指導(dǎo)聯(lián)盟做出了幾項重大變革。去年，NBA獲得了差不多40億美元與籃球相關(guān)的收入，是斯特恩于1984年接任總裁一職時的20倍。然而，保證一個健康運行的球員對話機制延續(xù)這么長時間，卻沒有那么容易。這些年來，斯特恩肯定得罪了不少人，最終導(dǎo)致了目前的僵局。這次停擺事件引發(fā)的對立情緒有可能使斯特恩的職業(yè)生涯蒙上污點，塞弗里德說。

?

????The selling spree currently swirling through the European debt markets, which regulators worry may spread to U.S. banks, was caused in large part by a series of policy gaffes by European regulators and banking authorities.

????On Oct. 26, the European Union's leadership agreed to force banks to raise their capital to asset ratios from 5% to 9%. The assumption was that Europe's 70 largest banks would get new money from investors or forego dividends, thereby restoring confidence to the financial system. But the decision left open another possibility: dumping assets, which is exactly what major banks appear to be doing.

????For instance, BNP Paribas, which is France's largest bank by assets, announced on Nov. 3 that it had sold off 24 billion euros ($32 billion) worth of sovereign bonds. "We very much reduced our exposure to sovereign debt," BNP Paribas CEO Baudoin Prot said in a Bloomberg television interview, acknowledging that the demand for new capital was the cause for the speeding up of the process. Among the sold items: $11 billion of Italian government bonds. The bank said it expected to lose more than $1.3 billion on the asset sales.

????Societe Generale and Germany's Commerzbank have also announced sell-offs of their sovereign debt, and it is believed many other institutions are quietly dumping their Italian bonds.

????"This was a big mistake," says Benn Steil, director of international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. "The banks looked at what it would cost to raise capital and they said that's prohibitive. They have been quite clear about their response: they are going to shed assets."

????Charles H. Dallara, managing director of the Institute of International Finance, which is representing 450 banks in their negotiations with Greece, warned European leaders that the recapitalization plan would cause serious problems. "The market value of the debt of the countries most under scrutiny is likely to decline further as banks unload sovereign bonds," Dallara wrote in a letter to G20 leaders meeting in France.