學(xué)歷不合格、歧視與排斥這些未受制約的行為阻礙了7000多萬(wàn)通過其他途徑(STARs)獲得技能的美國(guó)工人。這一“文憑天花板”是看不見的壁壘,它通過帶有偏見的招聘算法和對(duì)學(xué)位要求的執(zhí)著,篩選掉了許多合格的求職者。
然而,單純靠取消學(xué)位要求并不足以打破對(duì)合格員工的根深蒂固的刻板印象。我們的《2024年畢業(yè)生就業(yè)能力報(bào)告》顯示,79%的雇主認(rèn)為,學(xué)位對(duì)希望加入公司的入門級(jí)員工仍然具有價(jià)值,70%的雇主認(rèn)為學(xué)位是體現(xiàn)職業(yè)準(zhǔn)備度的有力指標(biāo)。
盡管高等教育無(wú)疑是一條獲得終身就業(yè)的可行途徑,但我們必須在保持高等教育價(jià)值的同時(shí),消除“文憑天花板”的系統(tǒng)性障礙,創(chuàng)造一個(gè)更加公平的勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)。四年制學(xué)位仍然對(duì)許多人有價(jià)值,但在美國(guó),只有約40%的人擁有四年制學(xué)位。鑒于低失業(yè)率和勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)巨大的人才缺口,為大多數(shù)沒有學(xué)位的人擴(kuò)大就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)至關(guān)重要。
只有當(dāng)整個(gè)勞動(dòng)力生態(tài)系統(tǒng)——政策制定者、教育工作者、雇主和勞動(dòng)者——共同努力打破這些偏見,接納并表彰那些通過適合自己學(xué)習(xí)方式和預(yù)算的方式掌握了就業(yè)所需技能的工人時(shí),真正的變革和顛覆才會(huì)發(fā)生。這些工人的真正價(jià)值在于他們專業(yè)知識(shí)熟練,有潛力填補(bǔ)不斷擴(kuò)大的人才缺口。如果不解決這一問題,到2030年,美國(guó)企業(yè)可能會(huì)面臨高達(dá)1.7438萬(wàn)億美元的收入損失。
令人振奮的進(jìn)展
雖然以技能為基礎(chǔ)的教育理念并不新穎,但它的普及一直較為緩慢。在分析招聘要求的現(xiàn)狀時(shí),我們的報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),只有12%的公司沒有任何學(xué)位要求。雇主、教育工作者和勞動(dòng)力發(fā)展從業(yè)者長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)一直倡導(dǎo)職業(yè)技術(shù)培訓(xùn)的價(jià)值,包括學(xué)徒計(jì)劃和行業(yè)認(rèn)可的證書。然而,圍繞這些證書和資歷的“低人一等”的偏見依然存在。
我們的報(bào)告顯示,企業(yè)之所以仍有學(xué)位要求,主要是因?yàn)樗麄冋J(rèn)為擁有大學(xué)學(xué)位的求職者更能勝任工作。然而,我們似乎正處于一個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn),越來(lái)越多的研究表明,四年制學(xué)位的投資回報(bào)率正在下降,這導(dǎo)致一些高等教育機(jī)構(gòu)開始率先推廣以技能為基礎(chǔ)的行業(yè)對(duì)口課程。
更加令人鼓舞的是,美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)的新提案,如兩黨共同提出的《美國(guó)強(qiáng)大勞動(dòng)力法案》和《兩黨勞動(dòng)力佩爾法案》,正在重新思考如何通過聯(lián)邦投資來(lái)幫助更多學(xué)習(xí)者,特別是工作中的成人,獲取非傳統(tǒng)的高質(zhì)量學(xué)習(xí)途徑,從而找到好工作。
20多個(gè)州已取消了許多州級(jí)職位的學(xué)士學(xué)位要求,近一半的雇主表示今年也在將這樣做。作為美國(guó)最大的雇主,聯(lián)邦政府也在采取措施,在每個(gè)聯(lián)邦機(jī)構(gòu)中采用基于技能的招聘方法。就在上周,美國(guó)副總統(tǒng)卡瑪拉·哈里斯表示,如果當(dāng)選總統(tǒng),她將取消某些聯(lián)邦職位的學(xué)位要求,而前總統(tǒng)唐納德·特朗普在任期間也曾發(fā)布行政命令,優(yōu)先考慮技能而非學(xué)位。盡管取得了這些令人振奮的進(jìn)展,但我們的《就業(yè)能力報(bào)告》顯示,要將這些規(guī)則和政策付諸實(shí)踐,仍有大量工作要做。
作為一家教育科技公司的首席執(zhí)行官,我親眼見證了基于證書的項(xiàng)目所取得的成功。我深受校友們啟發(fā),比如,一位新移民通過成人教育項(xiàng)目學(xué)習(xí)英語(yǔ)并獲得必要的技能,取得了醫(yī)療資格證書,從而提升了就業(yè)能力;一位曾是教師的單親媽媽兼顧在線課程與家庭生活,成功重返職場(chǎng)并轉(zhuǎn)型為兒童危機(jī)顧問。諸如此類的故事激勵(lì)著美國(guó)社會(huì)繼續(xù)致力于打破“文憑天花板”。
顯而易見的障礙
盡管有這些成功案例,但教育和招聘領(lǐng)域仍然存在明顯的障礙。隨著為培養(yǎng)就業(yè)準(zhǔn)備就緒的畢業(yè)生而拓展教育途徑和學(xué)習(xí)現(xiàn)代化的理念逐漸興起,教育體系本身卻遲遲未能適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代就業(yè)市場(chǎng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求。我們的報(bào)告顯示,39%的應(yīng)屆畢業(yè)生因?yàn)橛X得自己不夠格而沒有申請(qǐng)入門級(jí)職位,這一比例較2023年的33%有所上升。
雇主們也難以擺脫傳統(tǒng)的招聘結(jié)構(gòu),并對(duì)內(nèi)部技能培訓(xùn)的投資持謹(jǐn)慎態(tài)度,因?yàn)樗麄円蚕M吹矫鞔_的投資回報(bào)率。然而,日益嚴(yán)重的技能危機(jī)開始讓雇主們意識(shí)到采用技能導(dǎo)向思維方式的價(jià)值和影響。事實(shí)上,我們的報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),雇主們更傾向于優(yōu)先考慮那些掌握職位所需技能的求職者(38%),而不是只有大學(xué)學(xué)位的求職者(19%)。
當(dāng)教育工作者和雇主堅(jiān)持把學(xué)士學(xué)位作為衡量職業(yè)準(zhǔn)備度的主要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí),他們忽視了非傳統(tǒng)學(xué)習(xí)所提供的多樣化技能、興趣和能力。如果我們不將多種教育路徑作為獲得能力的可行途徑,我們將繼續(xù)限制數(shù)百萬(wàn)技能工人因?yàn)槿狈W(xué)位而在經(jīng)濟(jì)上的流動(dòng)性。
這進(jìn)一步加劇了社會(huì)的財(cái)富差距,阻礙了通向中產(chǎn)階級(jí)的道路。通過解決“文憑天花板”的系統(tǒng)性障礙,并提供更公平的教育和培訓(xùn)機(jī)會(huì),我們可以讓技能工人充分發(fā)揮潛力,最終創(chuàng)造更加繁榮的經(jīng)濟(jì)。
為實(shí)現(xiàn)教育現(xiàn)代化并繼續(xù)打破文憑天花板,教育工作者和雇主應(yīng)采取以下措施:
· 及早賦予學(xué)生選擇權(quán)。通過雙重注冊(cè)項(xiàng)目、職業(yè)技術(shù)高中、青年學(xué)徒計(jì)劃等途徑,教育工作者可以及早消除學(xué)位偏見,并規(guī)范高中以后的多種學(xué)習(xí)路徑。
· 利用教育機(jī)構(gòu)(如社區(qū)學(xué)院)與地區(qū)雇主之間的聯(lián)系,使教育機(jī)構(gòu)了解實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)中的具體技能缺口和勞動(dòng)力需求。
· 通過與勞動(dòng)力發(fā)展項(xiàng)目、實(shí)習(xí)機(jī)會(huì)和學(xué)徒計(jì)劃的合作,探索獨(dú)特的人才輸送渠道。
·制定明確的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),用于在招聘過程中評(píng)估非傳統(tǒng)求職者。根據(jù)人力資源管理協(xié)會(huì)(SHRM)的報(bào)告,只有三分之一的申請(qǐng)人追蹤系統(tǒng)(ATS)認(rèn)可非學(xué)位證書,而這些招聘技術(shù)已經(jīng)篩選掉了幾乎一半(45%)持有不被認(rèn)可證書的求職者。
· 促進(jìn)持續(xù)學(xué)習(xí)的文化,以保持終身就業(yè)能力并增強(qiáng)職業(yè)適應(yīng)性。正在崛起的新一代工人在一生中將會(huì)從事多種工作,而教育可以為個(gè)人的職業(yè)發(fā)展提供持續(xù)支持。
· 實(shí)踐跨代導(dǎo)師制,幫助有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的工人學(xué)習(xí)新技能并了解解決問題的新方法。
迄今為止,在打破文憑天花板方面取得的進(jìn)展令人鼓舞。我們的報(bào)告顯示,67%的雇主正在擴(kuò)大招聘范圍,考慮持有行業(yè)認(rèn)證和證書的求職者。但這項(xiàng)工作還遠(yuǎn)未結(jié)束。最后一道障礙顯而易見——教育系統(tǒng)和雇主的招聘實(shí)踐。未來(lái)的道路需要?jiǎng)趧?dòng)力生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的共同努力,來(lái)改變長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)延續(xù)的陳舊觀念。
只有這樣,我們才能釋放那些未被充分利用的勞動(dòng)力的真正潛力,他們的技能對(duì)填補(bǔ)崗位空缺和實(shí)現(xiàn)美國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)潛力至關(guān)重要。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
本文作者M(jìn)ichael Hansen是教育科技公司Cengage Group的首席執(zhí)行官。
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
學(xué)歷不合格、歧視與排斥這些未受制約的行為阻礙了7000多萬(wàn)通過其他途徑(STARs)獲得技能的美國(guó)工人。這一“文憑天花板”是看不見的壁壘,它通過帶有偏見的招聘算法和對(duì)學(xué)位要求的執(zhí)著,篩選掉了許多合格的求職者。
然而,單純靠取消學(xué)位要求并不足以打破對(duì)合格員工的根深蒂固的刻板印象。我們的《2024年畢業(yè)生就業(yè)能力報(bào)告》顯示,79%的雇主認(rèn)為,學(xué)位對(duì)希望加入公司的入門級(jí)員工仍然具有價(jià)值,70%的雇主認(rèn)為學(xué)位是體現(xiàn)職業(yè)準(zhǔn)備度的有力指標(biāo)。
盡管高等教育無(wú)疑是一條獲得終身就業(yè)的可行途徑,但我們必須在保持高等教育價(jià)值的同時(shí),消除“文憑天花板”的系統(tǒng)性障礙,創(chuàng)造一個(gè)更加公平的勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)。四年制學(xué)位仍然對(duì)許多人有價(jià)值,但在美國(guó),只有約40%的人擁有四年制學(xué)位。鑒于低失業(yè)率和勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)巨大的人才缺口,為大多數(shù)沒有學(xué)位的人擴(kuò)大就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)至關(guān)重要。
只有當(dāng)整個(gè)勞動(dòng)力生態(tài)系統(tǒng)——政策制定者、教育工作者、雇主和勞動(dòng)者——共同努力打破這些偏見,接納并表彰那些通過適合自己學(xué)習(xí)方式和預(yù)算的方式掌握了就業(yè)所需技能的工人時(shí),真正的變革和顛覆才會(huì)發(fā)生。這些工人的真正價(jià)值在于他們專業(yè)知識(shí)熟練,有潛力填補(bǔ)不斷擴(kuò)大的人才缺口。如果不解決這一問題,到2030年,美國(guó)企業(yè)可能會(huì)面臨高達(dá)1.7438萬(wàn)億美元的收入損失。
令人振奮的進(jìn)展
雖然以技能為基礎(chǔ)的教育理念并不新穎,但它的普及一直較為緩慢。在分析招聘要求的現(xiàn)狀時(shí),我們的報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),只有12%的公司沒有任何學(xué)位要求。雇主、教育工作者和勞動(dòng)力發(fā)展從業(yè)者長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)一直倡導(dǎo)職業(yè)技術(shù)培訓(xùn)的價(jià)值,包括學(xué)徒計(jì)劃和行業(yè)認(rèn)可的證書。然而,圍繞這些證書和資歷的“低人一等”的偏見依然存在。
我們的報(bào)告顯示,企業(yè)之所以仍有學(xué)位要求,主要是因?yàn)樗麄冋J(rèn)為擁有大學(xué)學(xué)位的求職者更能勝任工作。然而,我們似乎正處于一個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn),越來(lái)越多的研究表明,四年制學(xué)位的投資回報(bào)率正在下降,這導(dǎo)致一些高等教育機(jī)構(gòu)開始率先推廣以技能為基礎(chǔ)的行業(yè)對(duì)口課程。
更加令人鼓舞的是,美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)的新提案,如兩黨共同提出的《美國(guó)強(qiáng)大勞動(dòng)力法案》和《兩黨勞動(dòng)力佩爾法案》,正在重新思考如何通過聯(lián)邦投資來(lái)幫助更多學(xué)習(xí)者,特別是工作中的成人,獲取非傳統(tǒng)的高質(zhì)量學(xué)習(xí)途徑,從而找到好工作。
20多個(gè)州已取消了許多州級(jí)職位的學(xué)士學(xué)位要求,近一半的雇主表示今年也在將這樣做。作為美國(guó)最大的雇主,聯(lián)邦政府也在采取措施,在每個(gè)聯(lián)邦機(jī)構(gòu)中采用基于技能的招聘方法。就在上周,美國(guó)副總統(tǒng)卡瑪拉·哈里斯表示,如果當(dāng)選總統(tǒng),她將取消某些聯(lián)邦職位的學(xué)位要求,而前總統(tǒng)唐納德·特朗普在任期間也曾發(fā)布行政命令,優(yōu)先考慮技能而非學(xué)位。盡管取得了這些令人振奮的進(jìn)展,但我們的《就業(yè)能力報(bào)告》顯示,要將這些規(guī)則和政策付諸實(shí)踐,仍有大量工作要做。
作為一家教育科技公司的首席執(zhí)行官,我親眼見證了基于證書的項(xiàng)目所取得的成功。我深受校友們啟發(fā),比如,一位新移民通過成人教育項(xiàng)目學(xué)習(xí)英語(yǔ)并獲得必要的技能,取得了醫(yī)療資格證書,從而提升了就業(yè)能力;一位曾是教師的單親媽媽兼顧在線課程與家庭生活,成功重返職場(chǎng)并轉(zhuǎn)型為兒童危機(jī)顧問。諸如此類的故事激勵(lì)著美國(guó)社會(huì)繼續(xù)致力于打破“文憑天花板”。
顯而易見的障礙
盡管有這些成功案例,但教育和招聘領(lǐng)域仍然存在明顯的障礙。隨著為培養(yǎng)就業(yè)準(zhǔn)備就緒的畢業(yè)生而拓展教育途徑和學(xué)習(xí)現(xiàn)代化的理念逐漸興起,教育體系本身卻遲遲未能適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代就業(yè)市場(chǎng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求。我們的報(bào)告顯示,39%的應(yīng)屆畢業(yè)生因?yàn)橛X得自己不夠格而沒有申請(qǐng)入門級(jí)職位,這一比例較2023年的33%有所上升。
雇主們也難以擺脫傳統(tǒng)的招聘結(jié)構(gòu),并對(duì)內(nèi)部技能培訓(xùn)的投資持謹(jǐn)慎態(tài)度,因?yàn)樗麄円蚕M吹矫鞔_的投資回報(bào)率。然而,日益嚴(yán)重的技能危機(jī)開始讓雇主們意識(shí)到采用技能導(dǎo)向思維方式的價(jià)值和影響。事實(shí)上,我們的報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),雇主們更傾向于優(yōu)先考慮那些掌握職位所需技能的求職者(38%),而不是只有大學(xué)學(xué)位的求職者(19%)。
當(dāng)教育工作者和雇主堅(jiān)持把學(xué)士學(xué)位作為衡量職業(yè)準(zhǔn)備度的主要標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí),他們忽視了非傳統(tǒng)學(xué)習(xí)所提供的多樣化技能、興趣和能力。如果我們不將多種教育路徑作為獲得能力的可行途徑,我們將繼續(xù)限制數(shù)百萬(wàn)技能工人因?yàn)槿狈W(xué)位而在經(jīng)濟(jì)上的流動(dòng)性。
這進(jìn)一步加劇了社會(huì)的財(cái)富差距,阻礙了通向中產(chǎn)階級(jí)的道路。通過解決“文憑天花板”的系統(tǒng)性障礙,并提供更公平的教育和培訓(xùn)機(jī)會(huì),我們可以讓技能工人充分發(fā)揮潛力,最終創(chuàng)造更加繁榮的經(jīng)濟(jì)。
為實(shí)現(xiàn)教育現(xiàn)代化并繼續(xù)打破文憑天花板,教育工作者和雇主應(yīng)采取以下措施:
· 及早賦予學(xué)生選擇權(quán)。通過雙重注冊(cè)項(xiàng)目、職業(yè)技術(shù)高中、青年學(xué)徒計(jì)劃等途徑,教育工作者可以及早消除學(xué)位偏見,并規(guī)范高中以后的多種學(xué)習(xí)路徑。
· 利用教育機(jī)構(gòu)(如社區(qū)學(xué)院)與地區(qū)雇主之間的聯(lián)系,使教育機(jī)構(gòu)了解實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)中的具體技能缺口和勞動(dòng)力需求。
· 通過與勞動(dòng)力發(fā)展項(xiàng)目、實(shí)習(xí)機(jī)會(huì)和學(xué)徒計(jì)劃的合作,探索獨(dú)特的人才輸送渠道。
·制定明確的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),用于在招聘過程中評(píng)估非傳統(tǒng)求職者。根據(jù)人力資源管理協(xié)會(huì)(SHRM)的報(bào)告,只有三分之一的申請(qǐng)人追蹤系統(tǒng)(ATS)認(rèn)可非學(xué)位證書,而這些招聘技術(shù)已經(jīng)篩選掉了幾乎一半(45%)持有不被認(rèn)可證書的求職者。
· 促進(jìn)持續(xù)學(xué)習(xí)的文化,以保持終身就業(yè)能力并增強(qiáng)職業(yè)適應(yīng)性。正在崛起的新一代工人在一生中將會(huì)從事多種工作,而教育可以為個(gè)人的職業(yè)發(fā)展提供持續(xù)支持。
· 實(shí)踐跨代導(dǎo)師制,幫助有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的工人學(xué)習(xí)新技能并了解解決問題的新方法。
迄今為止,在打破文憑天花板方面取得的進(jìn)展令人鼓舞。我們的報(bào)告顯示,67%的雇主正在擴(kuò)大招聘范圍,考慮持有行業(yè)認(rèn)證和證書的求職者。但這項(xiàng)工作還遠(yuǎn)未結(jié)束。最后一道障礙顯而易見——教育系統(tǒng)和雇主的招聘實(shí)踐。未來(lái)的道路需要?jiǎng)趧?dòng)力生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的共同努力,來(lái)改變長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)延續(xù)的陳舊觀念。
只有這樣,我們才能釋放那些未被充分利用的勞動(dòng)力的真正潛力,他們的技能對(duì)填補(bǔ)崗位空缺和實(shí)現(xiàn)美國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)潛力至關(guān)重要。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
本文作者M(jìn)ichael Hansen是教育科技公司Cengage Group的首席執(zhí)行官。
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
Academic disqualification, discrimination, and exclusion are unchecked behaviors that are holding back more than 70 million U.S. workers who are skilled through alternative routes (STARs). This “paper ceiling” is an invisible barrier that’s filtering out qualified workers through biased hiring algorithms and a fixation on degree requirements.
However, removing degree requirements alone will not dismantle the deeply entrenched stereotypes about what constitutes a qualified worker. Our 2024 Graduate Employability Report found that 79% of employers believe a degree still holds value for an entry-level worker looking to join their company and 70% say a degree is a strong indicator of career readiness.
While higher education is undoubtedly a viable pathway to obtaining lifelong employment, we must strike the right balance of maintaining higher education’s value while tearing down the systemic barriers of the paper ceiling to create a more equitable labor market. While a four-year degree will continue to be valuable for many, only about 40% of Americans hold one. Expanding opportunity for the majority without a degree is critical given low unemployment and significant talent gaps in the labor market.
Real change and disruption can only happen when the entire labor ecosystem—policymakers, educators, employers, and the workforce—shakes these stigmas to embrace and celebrate workers who have equipped themselves with the skills needed for employment in ways that worked for their learning style and budget at that stage of their life. The true value of these workers lies in their skilled expertise and potential to fill ongoing talent gaps that, if unaddressed, could result in a $1.7438 trillion revenue loss for businesses by 2030.
Promising progress
While the promise of skills-based education is not new, it has been slow to take hold. When analyzing the state of hiring requirements, our report found only 12% of companies do not have any degree requirements. Employers, educators, and workforce development practitioners have long championed the value of career and technical training, including apprenticeships and industry-recognized credentials. However, the stigma surrounding these certificates and credentials as being “l(fā)ess than” continues to exist.
The main reason companies still have degree requirements is because they believe candidates who have a college degree are more equipped for the role, our report shows. However, we appear to be reaching an inflection point, as studies are beginning to show declining return on investment for four-year degrees, leading some higher-education institutions to pioneer and take to scale competency-based, industry-aligned programs.
Even more encouraging, new proposals in Congress, such as the bipartisan Stronger Workforce for America Act and the Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act, are rethinking how federal investments in postsecondary education can help more learners, particularly working adults, access non-traditional, high-quality learning pathways that lead to good jobs.
More than 20 states have eliminated bachelor’s degree requirements for many state positions, and nearly half of employers report working to do the same this year. Even the Federal Government is taking steps as our nation’s largest employer to adopt a skills-based hiring approach throughout every federal agency. Just last week, Vice President Kamala Harris said she would remove college degree requirements for certain federal jobs if elected president, and while in office, former President Donald Trump issued an executive order prioritizing skills over degrees. All this progress is promising–but as our Employability Report shows, there’s a lot of work to be done to put these rulings and policies into action.
I’ve witnessed the success of credentials-based programs firsthand in my role as the CEO of an edtech company. I’m inspired by alums like a newly arrived immigrant who enrolled in an adult education program to learn English and gain the skills needed to acquire healthcare credentials that improved her employability. Or a former teacher and single mother balancing online coursework with family life to re-enter the workforce and transition to a new career as a children’s crisis counselor. Stories like these embolden America’s collective passion and commitment to continue tearing the paper ceiling.
Obvious obstacles
Despite these success stories, obstacles remain in the most obvious places—education and hiring. As the concept of expanding educational pathways and modernizing learning to develop career-ready graduates has emerged, the education system itself has been slow to adapt and connect learning with modern job market realities. According to our report, 39% of recent grads didn’t apply to entry-level jobs because they felt underqualified, up from 33% in 2023.
Employers also struggle to move past traditional hiring structures and invest in internal skills training because they too want to see clear ROI. However, the mounting skills crisis is starting to open employers’ eyes to the value and impact of adopting a skills-forward mindset. In fact, our report found employers will prioritize a candidate who demonstrates a mastery of skills needed for the position (38%) over one who just has a college degree (19%).
When educators and employers cling to a bachelor’s degree as the primary determinant in career readiness, they fail to account for the diverse skills, interests, and capabilities that non-traditional learning can provide. Without embracing multiple educational paths as viable ways to achieve competency, we will continue to restrict economic mobility for millions of skilled workers due to lack of a degree.
This perpetuates society’s wealth gap, blocking the pathway to the middle class. By addressing the systemic barriers of the paper ceiling and providing more equitable access to education and training, we can empower skilled workers to achieve their full potential, ultimately creating a more prosperous economy for all.
To modernize their approach and continue tearing the paper ceiling, educators and employers must:
·Empower student choice—early. Through paths like dual enrollment programs, career and technical high schools, youth apprenticeships, and more, educators can remove degree stigmas earlier and normalize various learning paths after high school.
·Leverage the ties between educational institutions, like community colleges, and regional employers so institutions understand the specific skills gaps and workforce needs in the real economy.
·Explore unique talent pipelines through partnerships with workforce development programs, externship opportunities, and apprenticeships.
·Establish clear criteria for evaluating non-traditional candidates during the recruitment process. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) reports that only a third of applicant tracking systems (ATS) recognize non-degree credentials and that recruitment technologies are already filtering out almost half (45%) of candidates holding these unrecognized credentials.
·Embrace a culture of continuous learning to maintain lifelong employability and enhance career adaptability. The rising generation of workers will have multiple jobs in their lifetime and education can empower and sustain individuals for the evolving job market.
·Practice cross-generational mentorship, which can help experienced workers learn new skills and understand new ways to solve problems.
The progress made so far in tearing the paper ceiling is promising. Our report uncovered that 67% of employers are expanding their hiring search to include candidates with industry certifications and credentials. But the work is far from over. The final hurdle lies in the most obvious places—the education system and employers’ hiring practices. The path forward requires a concerted effort across the labor ecosystem to evolve the outdated mindsets that have perpetuated this oversight for far too long.
Only then will we unlock the true potential of an underutilized workforce whose skills are vital to filling jobs and fulfilling America’s economic potential.
Michael Hansen is the CEO of Cengage Group, an edtech company.