花旗投資研究(Citi Research)的分析師表示,美聯(lián)儲將在未來幾個月內(nèi)大舉降息,并一直持續(xù)到明年夏天。
在上周五的一份報告中,該銀行援引經(jīng)濟放緩的新跡象,認為美聯(lián)儲將從9月開始至2025年7月連續(xù)八次降息,每次降息25個基點。
該報告稱,這將使基準利率降低200個基點,即從目前的5.25%-5.5%降至3.25%-3.5%,并將在2025年的剩余時間內(nèi)保持這一水平。
首席美國經(jīng)濟學家安德魯·霍倫霍斯特(Andrew Hollenhorst)領導的花旗分析師表示,美國經(jīng)濟已經(jīng)從2023年的“高歌猛進”中降溫,通脹在經(jīng)歷了一些意想不到的粘性之后重新放緩。
但他們補充說,美國供應管理協(xié)會(Institute for Supply Management)的服務業(yè)指數(shù)突然轉為負值,月度就業(yè)報告顯示失業(yè)率升至4.1%,這些數(shù)據(jù)都增加了經(jīng)濟活動急劇走弱和降息步伐加快的風險。
這些數(shù)據(jù)以及美聯(lián)儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾上周二發(fā)表的鴿派言論表明,首次降息極有可能在9月份到來。
花旗預測:“在我們的基本假設中,經(jīng)濟活動的持續(xù)疲軟將促使美聯(lián)儲在隨后的七次會議中連續(xù)降息。”
該報告還指出了就業(yè)報告中的其他疲軟跡象。盡管總體就業(yè)人數(shù)增長20.6萬人似乎很穩(wěn)健,但前幾個月的數(shù)據(jù)被下調。6月份的臨時服務崗位減少了4.9萬個,花旗稱這是“經(jīng)濟衰退時通常會出現(xiàn)裁員類型,原因是雇主開始減少最不穩(wěn)定的勞動力”。
花旗稱,就業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)也可能偏向上行,因此,通過單獨調查得出的失業(yè)率才是更重要的指標。在這方面,花旗指出,如果失業(yè)率繼續(xù)以目前的速度上升,可能在8月觸發(fā)衰退指標“薩姆規(guī)則”。
相對而言,今年以來,霍倫霍斯特一直持相反觀點,即使華爾街的共識已轉向軟著陸,但他對經(jīng)濟的看法仍較為悲觀。
今年5月,他進一步警告稱,美國經(jīng)濟正走向硬著陸,美聯(lián)儲降息不足以阻止經(jīng)濟硬著陸。在此之前的2月份,即使在就業(yè)報告顯示就業(yè)大幅增長的情況下,他也做出了類似的預測。
霍倫霍斯特上周三在接受彭博電視臺采訪時指出,急劇的經(jīng)濟衰退可能會導致足夠的政治共識,讓政府增加支出以刺激經(jīng)濟,從而克服對巨額赤字的擔憂。但他補充說,更溫和的衰退可能不會達成這樣的共識。
他還指出,正如美聯(lián)儲加息對經(jīng)濟放緩的影響小于預期,降息對經(jīng)濟的刺激作用也沒有預期的那么大。此外,作為各種借貸成本基準的10年期國債收益率已經(jīng)低于2年期國債收益率,進一步下行空間較小,尤其是在赤字和通脹上升增加上行壓力的情況下。
霍倫霍斯特解釋道:“大多數(shù)經(jīng)濟活動將更容易受到5年期和10年期國債收益率的影響。這實際上與隔夜政策利率無關。因此,確實存在這樣的問題,降低政策利率能在多大程度上傳導這種刺激效應。”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
花旗投資研究(Citi Research)的分析師表示,美聯(lián)儲將在未來幾個月內(nèi)大舉降息,并一直持續(xù)到明年夏天。
在上周五的一份報告中,該銀行援引經(jīng)濟放緩的新跡象,認為美聯(lián)儲將從9月開始至2025年7月連續(xù)八次降息,每次降息25個基點。
該報告稱,這將使基準利率降低200個基點,即從目前的5.25%-5.5%降至3.25%-3.5%,并將在2025年的剩余時間內(nèi)保持這一水平。
首席美國經(jīng)濟學家安德魯·霍倫霍斯特(Andrew Hollenhorst)領導的花旗分析師表示,美國經(jīng)濟已經(jīng)從2023年的“高歌猛進”中降溫,通脹在經(jīng)歷了一些意想不到的粘性之后重新放緩。
但他們補充說,美國供應管理協(xié)會(Institute for Supply Management)的服務業(yè)指數(shù)突然轉為負值,月度就業(yè)報告顯示失業(yè)率升至4.1%,這些數(shù)據(jù)都增加了經(jīng)濟活動急劇走弱和降息步伐加快的風險。
這些數(shù)據(jù)以及美聯(lián)儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾上周二發(fā)表的鴿派言論表明,首次降息極有可能在9月份到來。
花旗預測:“在我們的基本假設中,經(jīng)濟活動的持續(xù)疲軟將促使美聯(lián)儲在隨后的七次會議中連續(xù)降息。”
該報告還指出了就業(yè)報告中的其他疲軟跡象。盡管總體就業(yè)人數(shù)增長20.6萬人似乎很穩(wěn)健,但前幾個月的數(shù)據(jù)被下調。6月份的臨時服務崗位減少了4.9萬個,花旗稱這是“經(jīng)濟衰退時通常會出現(xiàn)裁員類型,原因是雇主開始減少最不穩(wěn)定的勞動力”。
花旗稱,就業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)也可能偏向上行,因此,通過單獨調查得出的失業(yè)率才是更重要的指標。在這方面,花旗指出,如果失業(yè)率繼續(xù)以目前的速度上升,可能在8月觸發(fā)衰退指標“薩姆規(guī)則”。
相對而言,今年以來,霍倫霍斯特一直持相反觀點,即使華爾街的共識已轉向軟著陸,但他對經(jīng)濟的看法仍較為悲觀。
今年5月,他進一步警告稱,美國經(jīng)濟正走向硬著陸,美聯(lián)儲降息不足以阻止經(jīng)濟硬著陸。在此之前的2月份,即使在就業(yè)報告顯示就業(yè)大幅增長的情況下,他也做出了類似的預測。
霍倫霍斯特上周三在接受彭博電視臺采訪時指出,急劇的經(jīng)濟衰退可能會導致足夠的政治共識,讓政府增加支出以刺激經(jīng)濟,從而克服對巨額赤字的擔憂。但他補充說,更溫和的衰退可能不會達成這樣的共識。
他還指出,正如美聯(lián)儲加息對經(jīng)濟放緩的影響小于預期,降息對經(jīng)濟的刺激作用也沒有預期的那么大。此外,作為各種借貸成本基準的10年期國債收益率已經(jīng)低于2年期國債收益率,進一步下行空間較小,尤其是在赤字和通脹上升增加上行壓力的情況下。
霍倫霍斯特解釋道:“大多數(shù)經(jīng)濟活動將更容易受到5年期和10年期國債收益率的影響。這實際上與隔夜政策利率無關。因此,確實存在這樣的問題,降低政策利率能在多大程度上傳導這種刺激效應。”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
Get ready for a bonanza of rate cuts from the Federal Reserve that starts in a few months and extends all the way into next summer, according to analysts at Citi Research.
In a note on Friday, the bank cited fresh signs of a slowing economy for its view that the Fed will trim rates by 25 basis points eight times, starting in September and extending to July 2025.
That will lower the benchmark rate by a whopping 200 basis points, or from 5.25%-5.5% now to 3.25%-3.5%, where they will remain for the rest of 2025, the note said.
The economy has cooled off from its “heady” pace in 2023 with inflation resuming its slowdown after some unexpected stickiness, said Citi analysts led by chief U.S. economist Andrew Hollenhorst.
But the Institute for Supply Management’s service-sector gauge, which abruptly reversed into negative territory, and the monthly jobs report, which showed unemployment rising to 4.1%, have raised the risk of a sharper weakening of economic activity and a faster pace of rate cuts, they added.
The data along with dovish comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Tuesday suggest the first rate cut will very likely come in September.
“A continued softening of activity will provoke cuts at each of the subsequent seven Fed meetings, in our base case,” Citi predicted.
The note also pointed to other signs of weakness in the jobs report. While the headline payroll gain of 206,000 appears solid, prior months were revised down. And June saw a decline of 49,000 temporary services jobs, with Citi calling it “the type of decline that is typically seen around recessions as employers begin reducing labor with the least strongly attached workers.”
Payroll data are also likely skewed to the upside, leaving the unemployment rate, which is derived from a separate survey, as the more important metric, it said. And on that front, Citi pointed to the “Sahm Rule” recession indicator and said it could be triggered in August if unemployment continues to rise at its current pace.
Hollenhorst has been a relative contrarian this year by maintaining a dimmer view on the economy, even as the Wall Street consensus shifted to a soft landing.
In May, he doubled down on his warning that the U.S. is headed for a hard landing and that Fed rate cuts wouldn’t be enough to prevent it. That followed a similar forecast in February, even amid blowout jobs reports.
In an interview with Bloomberg TV on Wednesday, Hollenhorst noted that a sharp recession would likely produce enough political consensus for more government spending to stimulate the economy, overcoming concerns about the massive deficit. But a more mild recession may not result in such a consensus, he added.
He also pointed out that just as Fed rate hikes slowed the economy less than anticipated, rate cuts have not stimulate as much. In addition, 10-year bond yields, which serve as benchmarks for a wide range of borrowing costs, are already below 2-year yields, leaving less room for further downside, especially as rising deficits and inflation add upward pressure.
“Most economic activity is going to be more responsive to a 5-year yield, the 10-year yield. It’s not really about the overnight policy rate,” Hollenhorst explained. “So there really are questions about how much can you transmit that stimulative effect of lower policy rates.”