投資銀行杰富瑞集團(tuán)(Jefferies)在周三的一份研究報(bào)告中寫(xiě)道,在經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)蕩時(shí)期,硅谷的裁員潮和暫停招聘都表明大型科技公司“都認(rèn)識(shí)到一種新現(xiàn)實(shí)”。
這很可怕,但這種狀況到底意味著什么?
該報(bào)告的首席分析師布倫特·希爾對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“新現(xiàn)實(shí)是需求正在減少??萍脊疽恢痹诜e極招聘,如果我們真地陷入經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退,更多裁員將是不可避免的?!?/p>
分析師引用TrueUp的數(shù)據(jù)稱,今年已經(jīng)有約21萬(wàn)名科技公司員工被裁員,其中高達(dá)40%的裁員發(fā)生在第四季度。杰富瑞集團(tuán)的分析師發(fā)現(xiàn),互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和軟件公司目前的招聘崗位平均數(shù)量較今年年初時(shí)減少了36%。希爾表示,這暴露出科技公司在“低息貸款時(shí)期”的“過(guò)度擴(kuò)張”。
在大型科技公司中,Meta宣布計(jì)劃裁員11,000人,占總員工人數(shù)的13%。據(jù)媒體報(bào)道,亞馬遜(Amazon)已經(jīng)開(kāi)始類似規(guī)模的裁員,但最終會(huì)有多少員工被裁,目前仍不得而知。與此同時(shí),微軟今年宣布兩輪裁員,在10月份最近一次裁員1,000人。
杰富瑞指出,谷歌(Google)是唯一一家尚未宣布裁員的大盤(pán)股科技公司,但谷歌在今年早些時(shí)候已經(jīng)暫停招聘。
希爾表示:“你會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)不斷有證據(jù)證明,無(wú)論大型、中型還是小型公司,都處于將已發(fā)生的情況合理化的時(shí)期?!彼€表示:“需求不復(fù)存在,他們面臨巨大的成本壓力?!苯芨蝗鹬赋觯@三家公司的員工人數(shù)與其持續(xù)下滑的收入形成鮮明對(duì)比,凸顯出兩者的不匹配,以及這種合理化的必要性。
科技公司裁員源自疫情期間的過(guò)度招聘,分析師指出,科技公司需要“結(jié)合當(dāng)前的需求趨勢(shì),重新提高團(tuán)隊(duì)的工作效率”。
希爾表示:“收入減少導(dǎo)致員工創(chuàng)造的單位收入下降,公司必須放慢招聘速度?!?/p>
亞馬遜和Meta在今年第三季度的收入都表現(xiàn)不佳,與它們?cè)谝咔槠陂g的成功截然相反。
希爾引用巴菲特的“裸泳論”表示:“我認(rèn)為這種時(shí)期能夠暴露出哪些公司是‘專業(yè)運(yùn)動(dòng)員’,哪些是‘業(yè)余選手’?!卑头铺卣J(rèn)為當(dāng)市場(chǎng)下行時(shí)會(huì)暴露出各種問(wèn)題。希爾表示,未來(lái)還會(huì)有更多裁員,但他無(wú)法確定裁員規(guī)模,只是將遠(yuǎn)高于目前的水平。
他說(shuō)道:“如果你是科技公司的從業(yè)者,要做好準(zhǔn)備——未來(lái)將異常艱難。你最好讓公司看到你的工作效率,因?yàn)檫@是公司所需要的,而且這不會(huì)是第一波裁員。”
杰富瑞認(rèn)為,美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)將在明年第三季度陷入衰退。因此,希爾表示經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退尚未到來(lái),而“眾所周知,科技公司一直過(guò)于樂(lè)觀”。
他說(shuō)道:“我們不想嘩眾取寵。我們沒(méi)打算引起別人的關(guān)注。我們只是在面對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí),那就是科技公司必須調(diào)整其成本結(jié)構(gòu),因?yàn)樵诮?jīng)濟(jì)下滑時(shí)期,如果他們無(wú)法控制收入,他們只能控制一件事。那就是支出。而在科技行業(yè)最大的支出就是人事。”
希爾表示,科技行業(yè)的這種“新現(xiàn)實(shí)”是經(jīng)濟(jì)下滑過(guò)程自然而然的一部分,科技公司也無(wú)法“幸免”。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
投資銀行杰富瑞集團(tuán)(Jefferies)在周三的一份研究報(bào)告中寫(xiě)道,在經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)蕩時(shí)期,硅谷的裁員潮和暫停招聘都表明大型科技公司“都認(rèn)識(shí)到一種新現(xiàn)實(shí)”。
這很可怕,但這種狀況到底意味著什么?
該報(bào)告的首席分析師布倫特·希爾對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“新現(xiàn)實(shí)是需求正在減少??萍脊疽恢痹诜e極招聘,如果我們真地陷入經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退,更多裁員將是不可避免的?!?/p>
分析師引用TrueUp的數(shù)據(jù)稱,今年已經(jīng)有約21萬(wàn)名科技公司員工被裁員,其中高達(dá)40%的裁員發(fā)生在第四季度。杰富瑞集團(tuán)的分析師發(fā)現(xiàn),互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和軟件公司目前的招聘崗位平均數(shù)量較今年年初時(shí)減少了36%。希爾表示,這暴露出科技公司在“低息貸款時(shí)期”的“過(guò)度擴(kuò)張”。
在大型科技公司中,Meta宣布計(jì)劃裁員11,000人,占總員工人數(shù)的13%。據(jù)媒體報(bào)道,亞馬遜(Amazon)已經(jīng)開(kāi)始類似規(guī)模的裁員,但最終會(huì)有多少員工被裁,目前仍不得而知。與此同時(shí),微軟今年宣布兩輪裁員,在10月份最近一次裁員1,000人。
杰富瑞指出,谷歌(Google)是唯一一家尚未宣布裁員的大盤(pán)股科技公司,但谷歌在今年早些時(shí)候已經(jīng)暫停招聘。
希爾表示:“你會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)不斷有證據(jù)證明,無(wú)論大型、中型還是小型公司,都處于將已發(fā)生的情況合理化的時(shí)期?!彼€表示:“需求不復(fù)存在,他們面臨巨大的成本壓力?!苯芨蝗鹬赋?,這三家公司的員工人數(shù)與其持續(xù)下滑的收入形成鮮明對(duì)比,凸顯出兩者的不匹配,以及這種合理化的必要性。
科技公司裁員源自疫情期間的過(guò)度招聘,分析師指出,科技公司需要“結(jié)合當(dāng)前的需求趨勢(shì),重新提高團(tuán)隊(duì)的工作效率”。
希爾表示:“收入減少導(dǎo)致員工創(chuàng)造的單位收入下降,公司必須放慢招聘速度?!?/p>
亞馬遜和Meta在今年第三季度的收入都表現(xiàn)不佳,與它們?cè)谝咔槠陂g的成功截然相反。
希爾引用巴菲特的“裸泳論”表示:“我認(rèn)為這種時(shí)期能夠暴露出哪些公司是‘專業(yè)運(yùn)動(dòng)員’,哪些是‘業(yè)余選手’?!卑头铺卣J(rèn)為當(dāng)市場(chǎng)下行時(shí)會(huì)暴露出各種問(wèn)題。希爾表示,未來(lái)還會(huì)有更多裁員,但他無(wú)法確定裁員規(guī)模,只是將遠(yuǎn)高于目前的水平。
他說(shuō)道:“如果你是科技公司的從業(yè)者,要做好準(zhǔn)備——未來(lái)將異常艱難。你最好讓公司看到你的工作效率,因?yàn)檫@是公司所需要的,而且這不會(huì)是第一波裁員?!?/p>
杰富瑞認(rèn)為,美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)將在明年第三季度陷入衰退。因此,希爾表示經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退尚未到來(lái),而“眾所周知,科技公司一直過(guò)于樂(lè)觀”。
他說(shuō)道:“我們不想嘩眾取寵。我們沒(méi)打算引起別人的關(guān)注。我們只是在面對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí),那就是科技公司必須調(diào)整其成本結(jié)構(gòu),因?yàn)樵诮?jīng)濟(jì)下滑時(shí)期,如果他們無(wú)法控制收入,他們只能控制一件事。那就是支出。而在科技行業(yè)最大的支出就是人事。”
希爾表示,科技行業(yè)的這種“新現(xiàn)實(shí)”是經(jīng)濟(jì)下滑過(guò)程自然而然的一部分,科技公司也無(wú)法“幸免”。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
Silicon Valley’s wave of layoffs and hiring freezes amid a faltering economy reflect Big Tech “acknowledging a new reality,” investment bank Jefferies said in a Wednesday research note.
That’s frightening, but what does that mean?
“The new reality is that demand is fading,” Brent Thill, the lead analyst on the note, told Fortune. “And employee hirings have been so brisk that if we’re effectively headed into a recession, it’s only inevitable that we’re going to have more cuts.”
Around 210,000 tech employees have been laid off this year, with a whopping 40% of them coming in the fourth quarter, analysts wrote, citing data from TrueUp. Jefferies’s analysis found the average company in its internet and software coverage universe has 36% fewer job listings now than at the start of this year. Thill said it’s a signal of the “excess” that tech brought on during a “period of easy money.”
Among the tech megacaps, Meta announced its plan to lay off 11,000 employees—a 13% headcount reduction. Amazon has started layoffs of a reportedly similar size, although it’s still unclear how big the company will ultimately go. Meanwhile, Microsoft has announced two rounds of layoffs this year, with the latest in October cutting 1,000 jobs.
Google is the only mega-cap tech company that has not announced layoffs, Jefferies pointed out, although it noted that it implemented a hiring freeze earlier this year.
“You’re seeing continued evidence that large, medium, and small companies are all in a rationalization period of what’s happening,” Thill said, adding that “the demand is not there and their cost pressures are out of line.” The Jefferies note contrasted these big three firms’ headcount in contrast with their falling revenues, illustrating the mismatch—and the rationalization that needs to happen.
And the reductions in headcount stem from overhiring during the pandemic, which the analysts note are needed to “regain operating efficiency with a headcount that matches current demand trends.”
“If your revenue per employee is failing because revenue is not there, then you slow headcount,” Thill said.
And both Amazon and Meta underperformed in their third quarter earnings of this year—quite a shift from their pandemic-era success.
“I think this is kind of what really separates the true athletes from the amateurs,” he said, reminiscent of Warren Buffett’s famous “swimming naked” aphorism about how a down market exposes a lot of things. Still, Thill said there will be more layoffs to come, and he doesn’t know how big that number will get—but it’s going to be a lot higher.
“If you’re in tech, buckle up—it’s gonna be a tough ride,” he said. “And you better make sure you show up on the top of the efficiency page because they’re looking and this isn’t the first wave of cuts.”
Jefferies’ house view is that the economy will head into a recession in the third quarter of next year. So the recession hasn’t even hit, Thill said, and “technology companies have been notoriously too bullish.”
“We’re not trying to be dramatic,” he said. “We’re not trying to draw attention. We’re just trying to be realistic, which is [that] these companies have to get the cost structure in line because in the economic downturn, if they can’t control the revenue, there’s only one thing that they can control. And that’s expense. And the number one expense in tech are the people.”
Still this “new reality” for the tech industry is a natural part of an economic downturn—and tech is not “immune,” Thill said.