精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清,国产精品成人久久久久,国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍

首頁 500強 活動 榜單 商業 科技 領導力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

獲得大學文憑將不再是通往中產階級的最佳途徑,這或許是件好事

LINDSAY DAUGHERTY
2022-04-10

大學學費的激增,加上勞動力市場的旺盛,使得人們對大學文憑的效用產生了懷疑。

文本設置
小號
默認
大號
Plus(0條)

琳賽·多爾蒂寫道:“大學學費的激增,加上勞動力市場的旺盛,使得人們對大學文憑的效用產生了懷疑。”圖片來源:GETTY IMAGES

數十年來,接受高等教育、獲取學士學位始終被視為一塊必要的敲門磚,在此基礎之上,才能拿到足以讓人邁入中產階級或更高階層的工資收益。然而,目前仍有超過一半的美國民眾尚未獲得,且很大幾率不可能獲得四年制學位;2021年間,全美高校招生的人數甚至還有所下降。

究其原因,一定程度上確實是受到了新冠疫情的影響,但更深處的暗流涌動也不容忽視:自1980年代以來,大學學費翻了不止五倍,許多人需要幾十年才能還清當初的學生貸款。而與此同時,各公司都在招人,薪酬水平越來越高,因此,請假攻讀學位的成本也隨之不斷提升。難怪許多美國民眾都對大學文憑的效用產生了懷疑。

實際上,通往中產階級的途徑有很多,并非一定要完成四年制的學位課程。如今,大學、繼續教育培訓機構,甚至公司都能夠開設一系列短期學分課程。這類項目大多只需要不到兩年的時間,完全不會耽誤找份好工作。項目授予的個人證書(如文憑或短期教育證書)通常都與大學學分、行業認證(細分為工程、護理和人力資源等各種行業)以及學徒身份(如醫療保健、信息技術和焊接等領域)掛鉤。

研究表明,獲取此類短期非學位證書后,個人年收入有望增加2000至6500美元。這跟大學學費根本無法相比:兩年制公立大學年均學費約為3800美元,四年制公立大學年均學費則約為9400美元。大概有四分之一的學生需要至少六年才能順利畢業拿到學士學位,也就是說,他們的開支隨隨便便就能超過5萬美元。而許多非學位證書的課程只需花費不到5000美元就能結業。

在高中畢業后選擇短期技術教育的學生還可以憑借此類證書,繼續攻讀學位。越來越多的大學開設了“疊加”項目,即個人可參與證書課程獲得初始大學學分,在以加分的方式計入正式學分,最終可拿到已申請的副學士或學士學位。俄亥俄州的統計數據表明,先獲取非學位證書,再繼續攻讀學位的人,每年可以多掙9000美元。

盡管在大多數情況下,四年制學位仍然能帶來最高的收入,但并非所有專業的學位都具有同等的價值。在科學、技術、工程與數學(STEM)、建筑、商業和醫療保健領域獲得學士學位的人一輩子能掙到的相對較多,獲得文科和人文學科學位的人往往收入較低。至于副學士,專攻技術和特定行業領域(如醫療保健和工程技術)的人往往比專攻普通教育和文科的人薪酬水平更高。當然,非學位證書的效用也存在相當大的差別。因此對個人來說,甄別判斷非常重要。諸如美國教育部大學記分卡之類的工具就能夠通過比較收益和成本信息,幫助美國民眾評估不同大學和機構證書的價值。

不過,學費和收入并不能代表大學文憑的整體價值。考慮到在攻讀學位的過程中可能損失的薪酬和高昂的輟學率,一些短期非學位課程或許更有價值。獲得新證書將伴隨著許多無法用價值衡量的收益,包括更好的工作條件、更健康的身體和更低的監禁率。更好的工作環境、更穩定靈活的生活,或者僅僅是一份更令人滿意的工作,其“價值”都不能簡單地用收入的整體增長來衡量。畢竟,生活中許多最重要的東西有錢也買不到的。

獲得大學文憑還是通往中產階級的最佳途徑嗎?情況有些復雜。大學文憑確實能為很多人帶來更高的收入,但大學學費的激增,加上勞動力市場的旺盛,使得人們對大學文憑的效用產生了懷疑。事實上,通往中產階級的途徑有很多條,可能對一些人(特別是在職成年人、為父母者和那些缺時間、缺錢去上大學的人)來說,短期技術證書和副學士學位是更優解。重要的是,美國民眾理應在決定入學之前仔細考慮所有不同的途徑、不同大學和文憑的成本和收益,做有見地、負責任的消費者。(財富中文網)

琳賽·多爾蒂是無黨派非營利機構蘭德公司的高級策略研究員,專注于研究與勞動力發展、大學入學和成功相關的問題。

譯者:殷圓圓

數十年來,接受高等教育、獲取學士學位始終被視為一塊必要的敲門磚,在此基礎之上,才能拿到足以讓人邁入中產階級或更高階層的工資收益。然而,目前仍有超過一半的美國民眾尚未獲得,且很大幾率不可能獲得四年制學位;2021年間,全美高校招生的人數甚至還有所下降。

究其原因,一定程度上確實是受到了新冠疫情的影響,但更深處的暗流涌動也不容忽視:自1980年代以來,大學學費翻了不止五倍,許多人需要幾十年才能還清當初的學生貸款。而與此同時,各公司都在招人,薪酬水平越來越高,因此,請假攻讀學位的成本也隨之不斷提升。難怪許多美國民眾都對大學文憑的效用產生了懷疑。

實際上,通往中產階級的途徑有很多,并非一定要完成四年制的學位課程。如今,大學、繼續教育培訓機構,甚至公司都能夠開設一系列短期學分課程。這類項目大多只需要不到兩年的時間,完全不會耽誤找份好工作。項目授予的個人證書(如文憑或短期教育證書)通常都與大學學分、行業認證(細分為工程、護理和人力資源等各種行業)以及學徒身份(如醫療保健、信息技術和焊接等領域)掛鉤。

研究表明,獲取此類短期非學位證書后,個人年收入有望增加2000至6500美元。這跟大學學費根本無法相比:兩年制公立大學年均學費約為3800美元,四年制公立大學年均學費則約為9400美元。大概有四分之一的學生需要至少六年才能順利畢業拿到學士學位,也就是說,他們的開支隨隨便便就能超過5萬美元。而許多非學位證書的課程只需花費不到5000美元就能結業。

在高中畢業后選擇短期技術教育的學生還可以憑借此類證書,繼續攻讀學位。越來越多的大學開設了“疊加”項目,即個人可參與證書課程獲得初始大學學分,在以加分的方式計入正式學分,最終可拿到已申請的副學士或學士學位。俄亥俄州的統計數據表明,先獲取非學位證書,再繼續攻讀學位的人,每年可以多掙9000美元。

盡管在大多數情況下,四年制學位仍然能帶來最高的收入,但并非所有專業的學位都具有同等的價值。在科學、技術、工程與數學(STEM)、建筑、商業和醫療保健領域獲得學士學位的人一輩子能掙到的相對較多,獲得文科和人文學科學位的人往往收入較低。至于副學士,專攻技術和特定行業領域(如醫療保健和工程技術)的人往往比專攻普通教育和文科的人薪酬水平更高。當然,非學位證書的效用也存在相當大的差別。因此對個人來說,甄別判斷非常重要。諸如美國教育部大學記分卡之類的工具就能夠通過比較收益和成本信息,幫助美國民眾評估不同大學和機構證書的價值。

不過,學費和收入并不能代表大學文憑的整體價值。考慮到在攻讀學位的過程中可能損失的薪酬和高昂的輟學率,一些短期非學位課程或許更有價值。獲得新證書將伴隨著許多無法用價值衡量的收益,包括更好的工作條件、更健康的身體和更低的監禁率。更好的工作環境、更穩定靈活的生活,或者僅僅是一份更令人滿意的工作,其“價值”都不能簡單地用收入的整體增長來衡量。畢竟,生活中許多最重要的東西有錢也買不到的。

獲得大學文憑還是通往中產階級的最佳途徑嗎?情況有些復雜。大學文憑確實能為很多人帶來更高的收入,但大學學費的激增,加上勞動力市場的旺盛,使得人們對大學文憑的效用產生了懷疑。事實上,通往中產階級的途徑有很多條,可能對一些人(特別是在職成年人、為父母者和那些缺時間、缺錢去上大學的人)來說,短期技術證書和副學士學位是更優解。重要的是,美國民眾理應在決定入學之前仔細考慮所有不同的途徑、不同大學和文憑的成本和收益,做有見地、負責任的消費者。(財富中文網)

琳賽·多爾蒂是無黨派非營利機構蘭德公司的高級策略研究員,專注于研究與勞動力發展、大學入學和成功相關的問題。

譯者:殷圓圓

For decades, higher education and a bachelor’s degree have been viewed as crucial, near essential stepping stones to the sorts of earnings that would grant someone access to the middle class and beyond. But more than half of Americans still have not, and likely will not, receive four-year degrees; in 2021, college enrollment actually declined.

Part of this drop is surely due to the pandemic, but deeper trends persist: Tuition costs have increased by more than 500% since the 1980s, and many students end up with student loan debt that takes decades to pay off. At the same time, businesses are hiring and wages are rising, so the cost of taking time off work to earn a degree is higher, too. It’s no wonder that many Americans seem to be questioning the value of a college degree.

There are, in fact, many pathways to the middle class, and not all of them run through four-year degree programs. Colleges, continuing education training providers, and even employers now offer an array of short-term credential programs. Most of these require fewer than two years of coursework, and offer opportunities to more or less immediately move into good jobs. Such programs grant individuals credentials like certificates, or short-term educational credentials that often come with college credit; industry certifications, in careers as varied as engineering, nursing, and human resources; and apprenticeships in fields like health care, IT, and welding.

Research indicates that these shorter-term, nondegree credentials often lead to increases in earnings of $2,000 to $6,500 per year, while costing a fraction of what college tuition does, on average—two-year public colleges charge on average about$3,800 a year, versus $9,400 for four-year public college. About a quarter of students enrolled in bachelor’s degree programs will take at least six years to graduate, which means they could easily spend more than $50,000, compared to less than $5,000 for many nondegree credentials.

Students who start their post-high school education with these short-term technical credentials can also use them to work towards degrees. Colleges are increasingly embracing “stackable” programs that allow individuals to take the initial college credit from their certificate program and add to it (or “stack” on top of it) to eventually earn an applied associates or bachelor’s degree. Evidence from Ohio shows that those who started with a nondegree credential and went on to earn another credential saw more than $9,000 in additional earnings each year.

While four-year degrees still most often result in careers with the highest earnings, not all degrees have the same value. Those who earn a bachelor’s degree in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), architecture, business, and health care fields tend to earn more over their lifetimes, while those with liberal arts and humanities degrees tend to have lower earnings. And for associates degrees, credentials in technical, occupation-specific fields like health care and engineering technology tend to pay better than degrees in general education and liberal arts. Of course, there is also wide variation in the payoff to nondegree credentials, so it’s important for individuals to be discerning. Tools like the U.S. Department of Education’s College Scorecard can help Americans to assess the value of different college credentials and institutions by comparing information on earnings and costs.

But looking only at tuition and earnings doesn’t tell the whole story about the value of college credentials. When you factor in lost wages and the high dropout rates in many degree programs, some shorter-term nondegree programs can begin to look a lot more valuable. And there are many benefits to gaining new credentials that are impossible to capture in measures of value, including better working conditions, improved health, and lower incarceration rates. The “value” of a better work environment, a more stable and flexible life, or simply a more fulfilling job cannot simply be measured by an overall increase in earnings. After all, much of what’s most important in life money can’t buy.

Is college still the best path to the middle class? It’s complicated. College credentials still do lead many to increased earnings, but the rapid increases in college costs, coupled with such a strong labor market, have made the payoff for a college degree no longer a sure thing. The fact is there are multiple paths to the middle class, and shorter-term technical certificates and applied associates degrees may be better options for some—particularly working adults, parents, and those with limited time and money to devote to college. It’s important that Americans act as informed, responsible consumers, and think carefully about all the different pathways, the costs and benefits of different colleges and credentials, before deciding to enroll.

Lindsay Daugherty is a senior policy researcher at the nonprofit, nonpartisan RAND Corporation. Her research focuses on issues related to workforce development and college access and success.

財富中文網所刊載內容之知識產權為財富媒體知識產權有限公司及/或相關權利人專屬所有或持有。未經許可,禁止進行轉載、摘編、復制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財富Plus APP

前往打開

            主站蜘蛛池模板: 刚察县| 台江县| 巴东县| 姜堰市| 海门市| 汝阳县| 甘肃省| 大同县| 台南县| 桐柏县| 合作市| 施甸县| 尚义县| 芦溪县| 宝兴县| 霍城县| 瑞安市| 商河县| 陆丰市| 唐河县| 特克斯县| 杂多县| 西林县| 济宁市| 河池市| 比如县| 桃江县| 莱芜市| 中超| 马关县| 江山市| 兴仁县| 微博| 安远县| 清涧县| 襄汾县| 平阳县| 许昌市| 平湖市| 巫山县| 射阳县|