俄烏沖突引發的全球動蕩、新冠疫情導致的新一輪封城和持續的供應鏈混亂似乎還不夠嚴重,現在市場需要應對另一個危險信號。3月31日晚些時候,債券市場的收益率曲線在連續多日反復逼近里程碑點位之后,突然出現倒掛。2年期美國國債的收益率為2.337%,10年期國債的收益率下降至2.331%,變成了負利差。
收益率倒掛是一個危險信號,這意味著市場預期經濟狀況惡化,并且結束了標準普爾500指數(S&P 500)兩年來最糟糕的一個季度。道瓊斯指數(Dow Jones)當日收盤下跌1.56%,跌至34678點,標準普爾500指數收盤下跌1.57%,跌至4530點,納斯達克綜合指數(Nasdaq Composite)下跌1.54%,收于14220.52點。下文介紹了投資者需要知道的與收益率曲線倒掛有關的知識,包括它曾經多少次準確預測經濟衰退,以及這對于股市的未來行情而言意味著什么。
什么是收益率曲線倒掛?
在“正常”市場環境下,短期債券的收益率低于長期債券。這很有道理吧?2019年,《財富》雜志曾經在我們上一次見證收益率曲線倒掛時解釋過:“收益率曲線是比較不同期限國債利率的方法,比如說美國國債。在正常市場中,長期債券的利率(也就是收益率)應該高于短期債券的利率,因為投資者買長期債券要鎖定更長時間,期望獲得更高回報。”
陡峭的收益率曲線表明投資者預期未來經濟活躍。當天平突然反轉時,就會出現收益率曲線倒掛。2年期國債的利率突然高于10年期國債。這表明投資者預期經濟增速放緩,認為短期經濟狀況好于長期狀況。
為什么現在會發生收益率曲線倒掛?
這是受到了多個因素的影響。債券價格波動與收益率呈相反方向,當債券需求下降時,收益率上漲(反之,當價格上漲時,收益率下降)。Commonwealth Financial Network的全球投資策略師阿努·賈格加爾在最近的一份報告中寫道,今年美聯儲(Federal Reserve)為抑制通脹連續加息,導致債券的短期收益率和市場價格上漲,雖然長期利率也有所上浮,但幅度相對較小。他提出了出現這種狀況的四個原因:
1. 退休基金需要利用長期債券,將其負債期限與資產相匹配。退休基金多年來從股票投資中獲得了豐厚回報,他們也希望去風險化。
2. 各國央行普遍持有美國國債,這一方面是因為美元的儲備貨幣地位,另一方面美國國債的交易利率高于大多數發達國家發行的國債。
3. 美聯儲在今年3月召開最新會議之前一直在購買國債,旨在為新冠疫情之后的經濟復蘇注入流動性。
4. 隨著地緣政治風險增加,美國國債變成了投資者的避風港。
收益率曲線倒掛是否總是意味著即將出現經濟衰退?
并非如此。
賈格加爾寫道:“收益率曲線趨于平坦和最終倒掛,是經濟從中周期向后周期轉變的象征。”隨著在中周期中經濟復蘇有所起色,市場開始考慮美聯儲加息的影響。在后周期,市場開始擔心更緊縮的貨幣政策可能抑制經濟增長,導致經濟陷入低迷。收益率曲線倒掛被普遍認為是經濟衰退的預兆。
賈格加爾在報告中指出:“自1900年以來共出現過28次收益率曲線倒掛;其中22次隨后發生了經濟衰退。”
美聯儲最近的動作對收益率曲線有哪些影響?
有一種有趣的理論認為,美聯儲的大規模購債計劃對收益率產生了極大影響。據美國消費者新聞與商業頻道(CNBC)報道,投資管理公司Richard Bernstein Associates曾經進行過計算,“如果美聯儲沒有執行量化寬松,10年期國債收益率就可能接近3.7%。如果沒有央行的購債計劃,2年期和10年期國債的收益率曲線就極有可能相差100個基點,而不是倒掛。(1個基點相當于0.01%。)”
收益率曲線倒掛是否意味著股市即將崩盤?
如果你聽說過這樣一句話:“不要預測市場時機。”那么從收益率曲線倒掛與隨后的股市拋售之間的時間差中就能夠看出,判斷股市崩盤何時會發生是多么困難的一件事情。賈格加爾的研究認為,“即使發生收益率曲線倒掛,這并不意味著一定要處置股票等高風險資產。后周期與周期末不同,而且股票可以繼續提供正向收益。在1975年發生的6次收益率曲線倒掛中,全球股市在發生倒掛之后的12個月總體呈上漲趨勢。”
然而,賈格加爾寫道:“雖然發生收益率曲線倒掛之后股市上漲,但回報率普遍低于發生倒掛之前的水平。在收益率曲線倒掛發生后的12個月,防御性板塊的表現通常優于周期性板塊。”
所以收益率曲線倒掛確實是危險信號。這或許意味著投資者能夠利用這個機會買入價值股,或者構建防御性倉位。但這并不是開始恐慌的信號。(財富中文網)
譯者:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
俄烏沖突引發的全球動蕩、新冠疫情導致的新一輪封城和持續的供應鏈混亂似乎還不夠嚴重,現在市場需要應對另一個危險信號。3月31日晚些時候,債券市場的收益率曲線在連續多日反復逼近里程碑點位之后,突然出現倒掛。2年期美國國債的收益率為2.337%,10年期國債的收益率下降至2.331%,變成了負利差。
收益率倒掛是一個危險信號,這意味著市場預期經濟狀況惡化,并且結束了標準普爾500指數(S&P 500)兩年來最糟糕的一個季度。道瓊斯指數(Dow Jones)當日收盤下跌1.56%,跌至34678點,標準普爾500指數收盤下跌1.57%,跌至4530點,納斯達克綜合指數(Nasdaq Composite)下跌1.54%,收于14220.52點。下文介紹了投資者需要知道的與收益率曲線倒掛有關的知識,包括它曾經多少次準確預測經濟衰退,以及這對于股市的未來行情而言意味著什么。
什么是收益率曲線倒掛?
在“正常”市場環境下,短期債券的收益率低于長期債券。這很有道理吧?2019年,《財富》雜志曾經在我們上一次見證收益率曲線倒掛時解釋過:“收益率曲線是比較不同期限國債利率的方法,比如說美國國債。在正常市場中,長期債券的利率(也就是收益率)應該高于短期債券的利率,因為投資者買長期債券要鎖定更長時間,期望獲得更高回報。”
陡峭的收益率曲線表明投資者預期未來經濟活躍。當天平突然反轉時,就會出現收益率曲線倒掛。2年期國債的利率突然高于10年期國債。這表明投資者預期經濟增速放緩,認為短期經濟狀況好于長期狀況。
為什么現在會發生收益率曲線倒掛?
這是受到了多個因素的影響。債券價格波動與收益率呈相反方向,當債券需求下降時,收益率上漲(反之,當價格上漲時,收益率下降)。Commonwealth Financial Network的全球投資策略師阿努·賈格加爾在最近的一份報告中寫道,今年美聯儲(Federal Reserve)為抑制通脹連續加息,導致債券的短期收益率和市場價格上漲,雖然長期利率也有所上浮,但幅度相對較小。他提出了出現這種狀況的四個原因:
1. 退休基金需要利用長期債券,將其負債期限與資產相匹配。退休基金多年來從股票投資中獲得了豐厚回報,他們也希望去風險化。
2. 各國央行普遍持有美國國債,這一方面是因為美元的儲備貨幣地位,另一方面美國國債的交易利率高于大多數發達國家發行的國債。
3. 美聯儲在今年3月召開最新會議之前一直在購買國債,旨在為新冠疫情之后的經濟復蘇注入流動性。
4. 隨著地緣政治風險增加,美國國債變成了投資者的避風港。
收益率曲線倒掛是否總是意味著即將出現經濟衰退?
并非如此。
賈格加爾寫道:“收益率曲線趨于平坦和最終倒掛,是經濟從中周期向后周期轉變的象征。”隨著在中周期中經濟復蘇有所起色,市場開始考慮美聯儲加息的影響。在后周期,市場開始擔心更緊縮的貨幣政策可能抑制經濟增長,導致經濟陷入低迷。收益率曲線倒掛被普遍認為是經濟衰退的預兆。
賈格加爾在報告中指出:“自1900年以來共出現過28次收益率曲線倒掛;其中22次隨后發生了經濟衰退。”
美聯儲最近的動作對收益率曲線有哪些影響?
有一種有趣的理論認為,美聯儲的大規模購債計劃對收益率產生了極大影響。據美國消費者新聞與商業頻道(CNBC)報道,投資管理公司Richard Bernstein Associates曾經進行過計算,“如果美聯儲沒有執行量化寬松,10年期國債收益率就可能接近3.7%。如果沒有央行的購債計劃,2年期和10年期國債的收益率曲線就極有可能相差100個基點,而不是倒掛。(1個基點相當于0.01%。)”
收益率曲線倒掛是否意味著股市即將崩盤?
如果你聽說過這樣一句話:“不要預測市場時機。”那么從收益率曲線倒掛與隨后的股市拋售之間的時間差中就能夠看出,判斷股市崩盤何時會發生是多么困難的一件事情。賈格加爾的研究認為,“即使發生收益率曲線倒掛,這并不意味著一定要處置股票等高風險資產。后周期與周期末不同,而且股票可以繼續提供正向收益。在1975年發生的6次收益率曲線倒掛中,全球股市在發生倒掛之后的12個月總體呈上漲趨勢。”
然而,賈格加爾寫道:“雖然發生收益率曲線倒掛之后股市上漲,但回報率普遍低于發生倒掛之前的水平。在收益率曲線倒掛發生后的12個月,防御性板塊的表現通常優于周期性板塊。”
所以收益率曲線倒掛確實是危險信號。這或許意味著投資者能夠利用這個機會買入價值股,或者構建防御性倉位。但這并不是開始恐慌的信號。(財富中文網)
譯者:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
As if global unrest over the invasion of the Ukraine, new COVID lockdowns around the world, and continued supply chain tangles weren't enough, now the markets have another red flag to contend with. Late March 31 after flirting with the milestone for days, the bond market's yield curve inverted. The yield on the two-year Treasury was at 2.337% while the yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 2.331%, turning the spread negative.
The inversion is warning signal that the markets are expecting the economy to worsen, and served as a fitting end to the worst quarter for the S&P 500 in two years. The Dow Jones ended the day down 1.56% at 34,678, the S&P 500 lost 1.57% to close at 4,530 and the Nasdaq Composite fell 1.54% to end the day at 14,220.52. Here's what investors need to know about the yield curve inversion, how often it has accurately predicted a recession, and what it means for stocks going forward.
What is a yield curve inversion?
In a "normal" market environment, yields for shorter term bonds are lower than those with longer maturities. Makes sense, right? As Fortune explained in 2019 the last time we saw the yield curve invert: "Yield curves are a way of comparing the interest rates of the different maturity-date bonds a country issues—like U.S. Treasurys. In a normal market, interest rates (called yields) for longer-term bonds should be higher than those for shorter-term ones, because investors tie their money up for a longer time and want a greater reward for doing so."
A steep yield curve is a sign that investors are expecting brisk economic activity going forward. But a yield curve inversion is when that equation flips. Suddenly two-year are higher than 10-year rates. That's a sign that investors are expecting a slowing economy—they think short term conditions are better than those further out.
Why is the yield curve inverting now?
There's a combination of factors at work here. Bond prices move in the opposite direction of yields—so when demand for bonds fall, their yields rise (and vice versa, when prices rise, yields fall). Anu Gaggar, Global Investment Strategist for Commonwealth Financial Network wrote in a recent note that shorter term yields have risen as the market prices in a string of rates hikes this year as part of the Fed's campaign to stem inflation, and that longer-term rates have risen as well, but not by as much. He pinpoints four reasons why:
1. There is demand for long-term Treasury paper from pension funds that need to match the duration of their liabilities with their assets. They are also looking to de-risk after a few strong years of returns from their equity holdings.
2. U.S. Treasuries are a popular holding for global central banks, both because of the reserve status of the U.S. dollar and because U.S. Treasuries are trading at higher interest rates than government paper in most developed countries.
3. The Fed was purchasing Treasuries up until the last Fed meeting in March, in order to pump liquidity into an economy recovering from the pandemic.
4. With heightened geopolitical risks, U.S. Treasuries act as a safe haven for investors.
Does a yield curve inversion always mean a recession is coming?
Not always.
"Yield curve flattening and, ultimately, inversion are features of an economy that is shifting gears from midcycle to late cycle," writes Gaggar. The market starts to price in rate hikes by the Fed as the recovery gathers steam during midcycle. In the late cycle, markets begin to fret that tighter monetary policy could take the wind out of the economy and a downturn might be approaching. It is widely believed that an inverted yield curve is a harbinger of recession.
Gaggar reports that there have been "28 instances since 1900 where the yield curve has inverted; in 22 of these episodes, a recession has followed."
How have the Fed's recent actions impacted the yield curve?
One interesting theory is that the Fed's massive bond-buying program has had an outsized effect on yields. Richard Bernstein Associates, an investment manager, calculated that "if the Fed had never engaged in quantitative easing, the 10-year yield could be closer to 3.7%. Were it not for the central bank’s bond-buying program, the yield curve for the 2-year and the 10-year would then be more like 100 basis points apart, instead of inverted. (1 basis point equals 0.01%.)," according to CNBC.
Does a yield curve inversion mean the stock market is going to crash?
If you've ever heard the saying "don't try to time the markets," the lag between an inversion and any resulting selloff is certainly proof of how hard it is to judge when a stock market crash may come. According to Gaggar's research, "even when the yield curve inverts, it’s a poor signal for getting out of risk assets such as equities. Late cycle is not the same as end of cycle, and equities may continue to offer positive returns. In the six episodes of yield curve inversion since 1975, global equities have, in aggregate, risen in the 12-month period after the inversion."
However, "While equities have risen after the yield curve inversion, returns have generally been weaker than the pre-inversion period. Defensive sectors have typically outperformed cyclical sectors in the 12-month succeeding the 2s10s inversion," writes Gaggar.
So yes, an inversion is a red flag. And possibly a signal that it's a good time to rotate into value stocks or position your portfolio defensively. But not a sign to panic.