自從新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來(lái),美國(guó)制藥商Moderna公司就因?yàn)橐呙绶峙洳还膯?wèn)題而遭到了不少批評(píng)。為此,Moderna公司在本周宣布,將對(duì)92個(gè)中低收入國(guó)家的仿制疫苗廠商免收專利費(fèi)用。
Moderna還表示將在肯尼亞建立一座mRNA疫苗工廠。目前,Moderna只針對(duì)新冠肺炎這一種疾病開(kāi)發(fā)了疫苗。下一步,它還將推動(dòng)開(kāi)發(fā)十幾種其他疾病的疫苗。
很多倡導(dǎo)“疫苗公平”的人對(duì)當(dāng)下的國(guó)際疫苗分配機(jī)制很不滿意。特別是在非洲,哪怕只接種了一針新冠疫苗的人口,也還不到非洲總?cè)丝诘?8%。
人民疫苗聯(lián)盟(People’s Vaccine Alliance)的政策顧問(wèn)朱莉亞·科斯蓋指責(zé)道:“Moderna靠著對(duì)新冠疫苗的壟斷賺得盆滿缽滿,現(xiàn)在它顯然感到了千百萬(wàn)人的不滿和壓力。至于在這種疫情之中誰(shuí)能死、誰(shuí)能活,這個(gè)問(wèn)題顯然不應(yīng)該由Moderna的富豪首席執(zhí)行官(斯特凡內(nèi)·班塞爾)決定。”
非政府組織Global Justice Now的負(fù)責(zé)人尼克·迪爾登也表示:“這絕對(duì)是我們期望的底線。”
在這些社會(huì)活動(dòng)人士看來(lái),Moderna的承諾為何仍然讓他們感到不滿?其他研發(fā)mRNA疫苗的企業(yè)又將怎樣繞過(guò)Moderna的專利壁壘?
專利承諾
首先必須承認(rèn),Moderna承諾不向中低收入國(guó)家收取新冠疫苗專利費(fèi),這的確是非常重要的一步。到目前為止,Moderna最多也只是表示在新冠疫情期間不會(huì)向其他企業(yè)收取專利費(fèi)。
但是現(xiàn)在,全球大流行結(jié)束的曙光或許已經(jīng)不遠(yuǎn),Moderna必須就專利的問(wèn)題做出最終決定。而它的決定就是將富國(guó)和中低收入國(guó)家區(qū)別對(duì)待。
這92個(gè)國(guó)家都是通過(guò)新冠肺炎疫苗實(shí)施計(jì)劃(COVAX)機(jī)制獲取疫苗的發(fā)展中國(guó)家,但也有少數(shù)中低收入國(guó)家沒(méi)有在Moderna的名單上,比如南非和巴西,因?yàn)檫@兩個(gè)國(guó)家也有實(shí)力自行生產(chǎn)大量疫苗。
這其中,南非的作用是特別重要的,因?yàn)槭澜缧l(wèi)生組織于2021年在南非建立了一個(gè)mRNA疫苗技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心,它的工作已經(jīng)初見(jiàn)成效了,就在一個(gè)月前,開(kāi)普敦的生物技術(shù)公司Afrigen剛剛發(fā)布了一款基于Moderna公司的基因序列的mRNA新冠疫苗原型。
后來(lái)的幾周,世界衛(wèi)生組織又宣布計(jì)劃向巴基斯坦、越南、塞爾維亞和塞內(nèi)加爾等國(guó)的疫苗廠商分享新冠疫苗生產(chǎn)技術(shù)。但由于Moderna拒絕提供有關(guān)專業(yè)技術(shù),這些國(guó)家的疫苗研發(fā)進(jìn)程必將減緩。世界衛(wèi)生組織認(rèn)為,這樣一來(lái),這些國(guó)家至少需要三年時(shí)間才能夠完成疫苗研發(fā)和審批,而不是一開(kāi)始預(yù)計(jì)的12到18個(gè)月。
Moderna對(duì)政治新聞網(wǎng)站Politico表示,該公司的專利承諾同樣適用于世界衛(wèi)生組織的南非技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心,盡管南非并不在該公司的名單上。這樣一來(lái),世界衛(wèi)生組織及其合作伙伴未來(lái)在開(kāi)展相關(guān)合作時(shí)多少會(huì)有一些法律基礎(chǔ)——不過(guò)Moderna的承諾僅限于新冠病毒疫苗,而不包括結(jié)核、艾滋病等世界衛(wèi)生組織下步希望研發(fā)的其他mRNA疫苗。
另外,班塞爾還對(duì)媒體表示,Moderna不會(huì)與Afrigen或世界衛(wèi)生組織技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心的其他參與廠商合作,因?yàn)椤澳遣凰闶呛侠砝梦覀兊臅r(shí)間”。他還認(rèn)為這個(gè)技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心“有也挺好,但并不是非有不可?!?/p>
毫無(wú)幫助
迪爾登認(rèn)為,Moderna方面之所以對(duì)這項(xiàng)合作不熱心,是因?yàn)閷?duì)它“毫無(wú)幫助”。3月9日他在接受《財(cái)富》采訪時(shí)稱:“這個(gè)體系就是為了讓Moderna向mRNA中心轉(zhuǎn)讓技術(shù)而設(shè)立的。世界衛(wèi)生組織想向全世界分享這項(xiàng)技術(shù),而Moderna卻希望盡可能把它控制在自己手里?!?/p>
科斯蓋在一份聲明中指出:“如果Moderna真的關(guān)心中低收入國(guó)家獲得疫苗的問(wèn)題,他們就應(yīng)該將這項(xiàng)技術(shù)與世界衛(wèi)生組織的新冠疫苗技術(shù)庫(kù)分享,并且與南非的世界衛(wèi)生組織mRNA技術(shù)中心合作,并且撤銷他們?cè)谀戏巧暾?qǐng)的專利?!?/p>
不過(guò),Afrigen公司的常務(wù)董事彼得羅·特布蘭奇教授告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,Moderna雖然沒(méi)有向世界衛(wèi)生組織的技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心轉(zhuǎn)讓技術(shù),但這對(duì)Afrigen公司卻是因禍得福,否則的話該公司就只能完全照搬Moderna的技術(shù)來(lái)生產(chǎn)新冠疫苗了。
“事后看來(lái),我們很慶幸這種情況沒(méi)有發(fā)生。這樣一來(lái),南非的科學(xué)家和合作伙伴才可以真正地進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新,打破技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的條條框框,建立一個(gè)新的平臺(tái)?!?/p>
特布蘭奇還指出,從長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,一家公司僅靠新冠疫苗這一款產(chǎn)品是難以為繼的?!拔覀円呀?jīng)開(kāi)始立項(xiàng)研究艾滋病、埃博拉和登革熱疫苗了。這是一個(gè)多產(chǎn)品的平臺(tái),這也是我們想轉(zhuǎn)讓給中低收入國(guó)家的東西?!?/p>
特布蘭奇對(duì)Moderna不再向92個(gè)國(guó)家征收專利費(fèi)的做法表示了歡迎?!半m然這些國(guó)家不太可能成為mRNA疫苗領(lǐng)域的領(lǐng)跑者,但這至少做出了一種姿態(tài),表明我們?cè)敢馓峁┻@種‘疫苗自由’。在這里,我們要感謝Moderna,這比一年前我們所擁有的要多得多了?!?/p>
合作
在聲明中,Moderna還邀請(qǐng)全球各地的研究人員加入其最新的mNRA Access平臺(tái)。研究人員可以在該平臺(tái)上針對(duì)“被忽視的疾病”參與研發(fā)mRNA藥物,也能夠“針對(duì)各類病毒家族,探索全新的疫苗設(shè)計(jì),以應(yīng)對(duì)未來(lái)的‘X疾病’”。(“X疾病”是世界衛(wèi)生組織的一種叫法,代指目前未知但將來(lái)有可能造成大流行的一種疾病。)
迪爾登表示,Moderna的如意算盤是對(duì)mNRA Access平臺(tái)上的任何成果都可以申請(qǐng)共同專利。另外,Moderna還打算繼續(xù)對(duì)mRNA技術(shù)保持“壟斷控制”。(截至發(fā)稿時(shí),Moderna尚未回應(yīng)我們的置評(píng)請(qǐng)求。)
不過(guò),迪爾登也坦承,mNRA Access計(jì)劃也并不會(huì)產(chǎn)生什么反效果,只要它不至于“讓廣大發(fā)展中國(guó)家的科學(xué)家和政府都覺(jué)得:‘算了,我們還是不要自己努力了,干脆就用他們的這個(gè)方案好了。’”
“我也不認(rèn)為它能夠說(shuō)服任何人,尤其是從它對(duì)Afrigen公司的科學(xué)家的敵意來(lái)看?!彼a(bǔ)充道:“Moderna顯然擔(dān)心人們覺(jué)得它站在了歷史錯(cuò)誤的一邊,我覺(jué)得他們的擔(dān)心是有理由的?!?/p>
特布蘭奇說(shuō):“世界衛(wèi)生組織的mRNA技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心向Moderna傳遞的信息是,我們非常歡迎你們的這些聲明,我們也對(duì)它給非洲和相關(guān)合作伙伴帶來(lái)的機(jī)遇感到高興,但我們會(huì)繼續(xù)沿著當(dāng)前的路走下去。我們將把我們的新冠疫苗推向市場(chǎng),同時(shí)我們也會(huì)利用我們的mRNA平臺(tái)研發(fā)其他疫苗,因?yàn)檫@個(gè)平臺(tái)為中低收入國(guó)家提供了一個(gè)加速研發(fā)的工具。”
“我們將與很多合作伙伴全力合作。我們也愿意對(duì)Moderna發(fā)出邀請(qǐng):與我們合作吧!”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:樸成奎
自從新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來(lái),美國(guó)制藥商Moderna公司就因?yàn)橐呙绶峙洳还膯?wèn)題而遭到了不少批評(píng)。為此,Moderna公司在本周宣布,將對(duì)92個(gè)中低收入國(guó)家的仿制疫苗廠商免收專利費(fèi)用。
Moderna還表示將在肯尼亞建立一座mRNA疫苗工廠。目前,Moderna只針對(duì)新冠肺炎這一種疾病開(kāi)發(fā)了疫苗。下一步,它還將推動(dòng)開(kāi)發(fā)十幾種其他疾病的疫苗。
很多倡導(dǎo)“疫苗公平”的人對(duì)當(dāng)下的國(guó)際疫苗分配機(jī)制很不滿意。特別是在非洲,哪怕只接種了一針新冠疫苗的人口,也還不到非洲總?cè)丝诘?8%。
人民疫苗聯(lián)盟(People’s Vaccine Alliance)的政策顧問(wèn)朱莉亞·科斯蓋指責(zé)道:“Moderna靠著對(duì)新冠疫苗的壟斷賺得盆滿缽滿,現(xiàn)在它顯然感到了千百萬(wàn)人的不滿和壓力。至于在這種疫情之中誰(shuí)能死、誰(shuí)能活,這個(gè)問(wèn)題顯然不應(yīng)該由Moderna的富豪首席執(zhí)行官(斯特凡內(nèi)·班塞爾)決定?!?/p>
非政府組織Global Justice Now的負(fù)責(zé)人尼克·迪爾登也表示:“這絕對(duì)是我們期望的底線?!?/p>
在這些社會(huì)活動(dòng)人士看來(lái),Moderna的承諾為何仍然讓他們感到不滿?其他研發(fā)mRNA疫苗的企業(yè)又將怎樣繞過(guò)Moderna的專利壁壘?
專利承諾
首先必須承認(rèn),Moderna承諾不向中低收入國(guó)家收取新冠疫苗專利費(fèi),這的確是非常重要的一步。到目前為止,Moderna最多也只是表示在新冠疫情期間不會(huì)向其他企業(yè)收取專利費(fèi)。
但是現(xiàn)在,全球大流行結(jié)束的曙光或許已經(jīng)不遠(yuǎn),Moderna必須就專利的問(wèn)題做出最終決定。而它的決定就是將富國(guó)和中低收入國(guó)家區(qū)別對(duì)待。
這92個(gè)國(guó)家都是通過(guò)新冠肺炎疫苗實(shí)施計(jì)劃(COVAX)機(jī)制獲取疫苗的發(fā)展中國(guó)家,但也有少數(shù)中低收入國(guó)家沒(méi)有在Moderna的名單上,比如南非和巴西,因?yàn)檫@兩個(gè)國(guó)家也有實(shí)力自行生產(chǎn)大量疫苗。
這其中,南非的作用是特別重要的,因?yàn)槭澜缧l(wèi)生組織于2021年在南非建立了一個(gè)mRNA疫苗技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心,它的工作已經(jīng)初見(jiàn)成效了,就在一個(gè)月前,開(kāi)普敦的生物技術(shù)公司Afrigen剛剛發(fā)布了一款基于Moderna公司的基因序列的mRNA新冠疫苗原型。
后來(lái)的幾周,世界衛(wèi)生組織又宣布計(jì)劃向巴基斯坦、越南、塞爾維亞和塞內(nèi)加爾等國(guó)的疫苗廠商分享新冠疫苗生產(chǎn)技術(shù)。但由于Moderna拒絕提供有關(guān)專業(yè)技術(shù),這些國(guó)家的疫苗研發(fā)進(jìn)程必將減緩。世界衛(wèi)生組織認(rèn)為,這樣一來(lái),這些國(guó)家至少需要三年時(shí)間才能夠完成疫苗研發(fā)和審批,而不是一開(kāi)始預(yù)計(jì)的12到18個(gè)月。
Moderna對(duì)政治新聞網(wǎng)站Politico表示,該公司的專利承諾同樣適用于世界衛(wèi)生組織的南非技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心,盡管南非并不在該公司的名單上。這樣一來(lái),世界衛(wèi)生組織及其合作伙伴未來(lái)在開(kāi)展相關(guān)合作時(shí)多少會(huì)有一些法律基礎(chǔ)——不過(guò)Moderna的承諾僅限于新冠病毒疫苗,而不包括結(jié)核、艾滋病等世界衛(wèi)生組織下步希望研發(fā)的其他mRNA疫苗。
另外,班塞爾還對(duì)媒體表示,Moderna不會(huì)與Afrigen或世界衛(wèi)生組織技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心的其他參與廠商合作,因?yàn)椤澳遣凰闶呛侠砝梦覀兊臅r(shí)間”。他還認(rèn)為這個(gè)技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心“有也挺好,但并不是非有不可?!?/p>
毫無(wú)幫助
迪爾登認(rèn)為,Moderna方面之所以對(duì)這項(xiàng)合作不熱心,是因?yàn)閷?duì)它“毫無(wú)幫助”。3月9日他在接受《財(cái)富》采訪時(shí)稱:“這個(gè)體系就是為了讓Moderna向mRNA中心轉(zhuǎn)讓技術(shù)而設(shè)立的。世界衛(wèi)生組織想向全世界分享這項(xiàng)技術(shù),而Moderna卻希望盡可能把它控制在自己手里?!?/p>
科斯蓋在一份聲明中指出:“如果Moderna真的關(guān)心中低收入國(guó)家獲得疫苗的問(wèn)題,他們就應(yīng)該將這項(xiàng)技術(shù)與世界衛(wèi)生組織的新冠疫苗技術(shù)庫(kù)分享,并且與南非的世界衛(wèi)生組織mRNA技術(shù)中心合作,并且撤銷他們?cè)谀戏巧暾?qǐng)的專利?!?/p>
不過(guò),Afrigen公司的常務(wù)董事彼得羅·特布蘭奇教授告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,Moderna雖然沒(méi)有向世界衛(wèi)生組織的技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心轉(zhuǎn)讓技術(shù),但這對(duì)Afrigen公司卻是因禍得福,否則的話該公司就只能完全照搬Moderna的技術(shù)來(lái)生產(chǎn)新冠疫苗了。
“事后看來(lái),我們很慶幸這種情況沒(méi)有發(fā)生。這樣一來(lái),南非的科學(xué)家和合作伙伴才可以真正地進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新,打破技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的條條框框,建立一個(gè)新的平臺(tái)?!?/p>
特布蘭奇還指出,從長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,一家公司僅靠新冠疫苗這一款產(chǎn)品是難以為繼的?!拔覀円呀?jīng)開(kāi)始立項(xiàng)研究艾滋病、埃博拉和登革熱疫苗了。這是一個(gè)多產(chǎn)品的平臺(tái),這也是我們想轉(zhuǎn)讓給中低收入國(guó)家的東西?!?/p>
特布蘭奇對(duì)Moderna不再向92個(gè)國(guó)家征收專利費(fèi)的做法表示了歡迎。“雖然這些國(guó)家不太可能成為mRNA疫苗領(lǐng)域的領(lǐng)跑者,但這至少做出了一種姿態(tài),表明我們?cè)敢馓峁┻@種‘疫苗自由’。在這里,我們要感謝Moderna,這比一年前我們所擁有的要多得多了?!?/p>
合作
在聲明中,Moderna還邀請(qǐng)全球各地的研究人員加入其最新的mNRA Access平臺(tái)。研究人員可以在該平臺(tái)上針對(duì)“被忽視的疾病”參與研發(fā)mRNA藥物,也能夠“針對(duì)各類病毒家族,探索全新的疫苗設(shè)計(jì),以應(yīng)對(duì)未來(lái)的‘X疾病’”。(“X疾病”是世界衛(wèi)生組織的一種叫法,代指目前未知但將來(lái)有可能造成大流行的一種疾病。)
迪爾登表示,Moderna的如意算盤是對(duì)mNRA Access平臺(tái)上的任何成果都可以申請(qǐng)共同專利。另外,Moderna還打算繼續(xù)對(duì)mRNA技術(shù)保持“壟斷控制”。(截至發(fā)稿時(shí),Moderna尚未回應(yīng)我們的置評(píng)請(qǐng)求。)
不過(guò),迪爾登也坦承,mNRA Access計(jì)劃也并不會(huì)產(chǎn)生什么反效果,只要它不至于“讓廣大發(fā)展中國(guó)家的科學(xué)家和政府都覺(jué)得:‘算了,我們還是不要自己努力了,干脆就用他們的這個(gè)方案好了?!?/p>
“我也不認(rèn)為它能夠說(shuō)服任何人,尤其是從它對(duì)Afrigen公司的科學(xué)家的敵意來(lái)看?!彼a(bǔ)充道:“Moderna顯然擔(dān)心人們覺(jué)得它站在了歷史錯(cuò)誤的一邊,我覺(jué)得他們的擔(dān)心是有理由的。”
特布蘭奇說(shuō):“世界衛(wèi)生組織的mRNA技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓中心向Moderna傳遞的信息是,我們非常歡迎你們的這些聲明,我們也對(duì)它給非洲和相關(guān)合作伙伴帶來(lái)的機(jī)遇感到高興,但我們會(huì)繼續(xù)沿著當(dāng)前的路走下去。我們將把我們的新冠疫苗推向市場(chǎng),同時(shí)我們也會(huì)利用我們的mRNA平臺(tái)研發(fā)其他疫苗,因?yàn)檫@個(gè)平臺(tái)為中低收入國(guó)家提供了一個(gè)加速研發(fā)的工具?!?/p>
“我們將與很多合作伙伴全力合作。我們也愿意對(duì)Moderna發(fā)出邀請(qǐng):與我們合作吧!”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:樸成奎
Moderna this week moved to address vaccine-inequality criticisms by promising to never enforce its patents against potential COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers in 92 low- and middle-income countries.
The U.S. firm also said it would establish an mRNA vaccine plant in Kenya and push to develop vaccines for more than a dozen diseases that aren’t COVID-19—currently the only ailment for which Moderna has a product.
Vaccine equity advocates, who are trying to turn around a situation where less than 18% of Africans have received even one COVID jab, are not impressed.
“Moderna is clearly feeling the pressure from the millions of people challenging their lucrative monopoly, but their billionaire CEO [Stéphane Bancel] shouldn’t get to choose who lives and who dies in this pandemic,” thundered People’s Vaccine Alliance policy adviser Julia Kosgei.
“This is the absolute minimum we should expect,” complained Nick Dearden, director of the NGO Global Justice Now.
Here’s how Moderna’s promises fall short in the eyes of these campaigners—and how those developing new mRNA vaccines plan to push past the pledge’s limitations.
Patent pledge
Moderna’s pledge to never enforce its COVID-vaccine patents in non-rich countries really is a significant step. Until now, the drugmaker has only said it wouldn’t enforce its patents against other companies during the pandemic.
With the end of the pandemic perhaps being in sight, Moderna had to make a decision one way or the other, and now it’s done just that, splitting the ways it will respond to patent issues in rich countries and the rest of the world.
But the list of the 92 countries—all of which are getting vaccines through the COVAX financing mechanism for developing nations—has some notable exceptions such as South Africa and Brazil, which are countries that have the capacity to produce serious quantities of vaccines.
South Africa is particularly important because it’s where the World Health Organization last year set up an mRNA vaccine technology-transfer hub, which bore fruit a month ago when the Cape Town–based biotech Afrigen revealed a prototype mRNA vaccine for COVID-19 that is based on Moderna’s sequence.
In the ensuing weeks, the WHO announced plans to share the technology with potential manufacturers everywhere from Pakistan and Vietnam to Serbia and Senegal. However, the vaccine’s development will be slowed by the fact that Moderna has refused to cooperate with the WHO hub in providing technical expertise; the WHO has estimated this means it will take at least three years to get the vaccine finished and approved, rather than 12 to 18 months.
Moderna told Politico that the WHO’s South African hub would be party to the pledge, even though South Africa isn’t on its list. That would certainly go some way to giving the WHO and its partners some legal certainty about the future—albeit only relating to COVID vaccines and not to other potential mRNA vaccines for things like tuberculosis and HIV, which the WHO hopes to develop.
However, Bancel told the publication that Moderna wouldn’t work with Afrigen and other hub participants, because that wouldn’t be “a good use of our time.” He also described the hub as a “nice to have, not a must have.”
“Incredibly unhelpful”
Dearden described this as “incredibly unhelpful” on Moderna’s part. “The systems are all set up for Moderna to share their technology with the mRNA hub,” he told Fortune on March 9. “They have the systems in place with the WHO to share this technology around the world, [but] Moderna wants to do everything possible to control this technology.”
“If Moderna really cared about vaccine access for low- and middle-income countries, they would share their vaccine blueprints with the WHO’s COVID-19 technology access pool, cooperate with the WHO mRNA hub in South Africa, and revoke the patents they have filed in that country,” Kosgei said in a statement.
However, professor Petro Terblanche, Afrigen’s managing director, told Fortune that Moderna’s failure to transfer technology to the WHO hub had turned out to be a blessing in disguise, because such a deal may have restricted the team to only making COVID vaccines using Moderna’s blueprints.
“In hindsight we are quite grateful that never happened,” she said. “It allowed the group of South African scientists and partners to really innovate and to break out of the box of the technology transfer and build a platform.
“We already are putting programs together to look at HIV, Ebola, and dengue fever,” Terblanche said, adding that it would be unsustainable to develop the mRNA technology for COVID alone. “This is designed to be a multiproduct platform, and this is what we want to transfer to these low- and middle-income countries,” she said.
Terblanche welcomed Moderna’s decision not to enforce its patents in the 92 countries. “That those countries are unlikely to be the front-runners in adopting this technology doesn’t matter,” she said. “It just says, ‘We are prepared to provide that freedom.’ Moderna, thank you, this is much more than we had a year ago.”
Partnerships
Also included in Moderna’s announcement was an invitation to researchers around the world to join Moderna’s new “mRNA Access” program. There, they could codevelop mRNA drugs for existing “neglected diseases” and “explore novel vaccine designs against prototype viral families in preparation for Disease X”—a term the WHO uses to refer to a future pandemic we currently can’t anticipate.
Dearden said Moderna will benefit by co-patenting the resulting inventions and intends to maintain “monopoly control” over the technology. (Moderna had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publication.)
However, the NGO chief conceded that the program wouldn’t be counterproductive, as long as it isn’t “enough to convince those scientists and governments and manufacturers in the Global South to go, ‘Well, we can give up on our independent efforts now and just go with this solution.’
“I don’t think it’s going to convince anybody, particularly given their hostility to the scientists at Afrigen,” he added. “Moderna are clearly worried about being perceived to be on the wrong side of history here, I think with good reason.”
“The message from the mRNA hub to Moderna is we really welcome these announcements, and we’re really excited about the opportunities it brings to Africa and to our partners, and we will walk the road,” said Terblanche. “But I tell you this, we’re going to keep going. We’re going to take a vaccine to market for COVID-19, but we’re also going to do other vaccines using our mRNA platform because this platform provides a tool to low- and middle-income countries to expedite.
“We’re going to go full blast, with many partners. Our invitation to Moderna is: Work with us.”