精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清,国产精品成人久久久久,国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍

首頁 500強 活動 榜單 商業 科技 領導力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

這個職位眼下在美國供不應求,每周能夠掙5000美元

Kat Eschner
2021-12-26

自新冠疫情爆發以來,旅行護士的市場規模不斷增長。

文本設置
小號
默認
大號
Plus(0條)

當新冠疫情開始時,杰西·莫格勒擔任急診室護士還不到一年。他說,那段時間里他在美國新墨西哥州法明頓市的圣胡安地區醫療中心(San Juan Regional Medical Center)繁忙的急診室工作,當時就有旅行護士,每個班次可能一到兩人。旅行護士的經驗往往不如全職護士,幫助他們適應急診室的做事方式也要資深護士花費不少時間。盡管如此,旅行護士還是很有幫助,尤其是人們不喜歡的晚班。

等到一年后他離開時,新冠病毒的傳播已經呈現出燎原之勢,醫院里也到處是旅行護士,尤其是晚班和夜班。他說,有時甚至是半夜負責統管各項事務的主管護士也是“旅行護士”。

莫格勒2018年畢業于護理學校,他發現自己正在迅速變成業內經驗最豐富的護士之一。當時他需要照顧的病人數量比以往任何時候都多,有時還負責6到10個急診病例。

莫格勒說,在學校里,老師不斷強調,分配給護士的病人如果出現可以預防的事故或死亡,護士就可能面臨質詢甚至撤銷護理執照,更別提知曉自己為不必要的痛苦承擔責任帶來的創傷。“我們越發感覺到,每次上班都在努力避免創傷性事故、創傷或危重病人,阻止不必要的死亡。”他說。“病人很危險,當護士也很危險。”

為了給日漸耗盡精力的工作爭取更高薪水(也是為了盡快擺脫感覺不安全的環境),莫格勒在旅行護士求職公告欄上發布了消息,而且很快就收到了大量招聘短信和語音郵件。今年10月,他開始聯系招聘方,決定前往新墨西哥州的杜蘭戈工作到2021年年底,每小時的收入是全職護士的四倍。

從早期的呼吸機短缺到如今無休止拖延的常規程序,新冠病毒對醫療行業的影響非常廣泛。但最顯著的影響之一是對照顧病人的職業市場的影響。對愿意為出價最高者工作的人們而言,旅行護士需求激增大幅提升了其工資。基于過去90天內59000份活躍招聘職位的信息,醫療保健工作委員會(Healthcare job board)的維維安估計,目前美國旅行注冊護士的平均工資幾乎達到每周3200美元。按照維維安的說法,平均每周工作36小時的旅行護士的時薪近90美元。根據美國勞工統計局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的數據,這一水平是2020年美國護理人員時薪中位數的兩倍多。但一些人表示,人員輪換破壞了醫院穩定,而即將進入新冠疫情第三年的醫護人員已經瀕臨崩潰。隨著冬季疫情病例激增,奧密克戎變異毒株來勢洶洶,再加上流感季的到來,重癥監護室紛紛開始補充人手,協助醫院運行的不穩定系統將面臨挑戰。

成為“旅行護士”

蒙大拿州立大學(Montana State University)的護理政策專家彼得·布爾豪斯稱,早在20世紀70年代,旅行護士就已經存在。“這群人從來都不是護士隊伍的重要組成部分。”他說。該領域一度被用來填補局部護士短缺,在新冠疫情爆發前就開始增長。市場研究機構Grand View Research于2020年年初發布的一份市場報告稱,僅2019年一年,旅行護士市場就增長了7%,部分原因是醫院正在削減全職員工成本。

自新冠疫情爆發以來,旅行護士的市場規模不斷增長。據Staffing Industry Analysts告訴估計,2020年,美國旅行護士人力資源行業增長了35%,從2019年的62億美元增至84億美元。Staffing Industry Analysts預計到2021年年底,這一市場將進一步擴大40%,達到118億美元。

“雖然2020年和2021年的旅行護士人數增長迅速,但市場規模增長在很大程度上是因為需求與供給不平衡導致工資的大幅上升。”Staffing Industry Analysts的北美研究主管蒂莫西·蘭德胡伊斯說。

Facebook(已改名為Meta——編注)的活躍群組“周薪至少5000美元的旅行護士工作”(Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up)的成員超過10萬人,招聘人員發布的信息和帖子非常多。不管是招聘網站還是Facebook小組,都是旅行護士找工作的主要方式。AMN Healthcare是美國最大的醫療人才公司之一,今年5月,公司的首席執行官蘇珊·薩爾卡在美國銀行(Bank of America)的醫療狀況虛擬會議上表示,該公司的業務主要依靠口碑來推動。

在新冠疫情期間,醫療人才公司的收入相當可觀。AMN Healthcare的2021年三季報中收入相比2020年增幅達60%。另一家知名公司Cross Country Healthcare的業績增長更加明顯,2021年三季度同比增幅達93%。

通常來說,旅行護士只能夠在護理執照有效的特定州或地區工作。喬治·華盛頓大學(George Washington University)的衛生人力研究中心(Health Workforce Research Center)的主任波利·皮特曼說,第一波疫情期間,州政府放松了限制,旅行護理的案例也為人才跨州流動至最需要的地方工作提供了框架。到第三波疫情時,新冠病毒已經無處不在,護士仍然可以自由選擇工作地點。競價大戰隨后爆發。

“我認為旅行護士具有重要的作用,如果適度的話。”皮特曼說。大量研究表明,如果過多聘用旅行護士,對醫院底線、員工士氣或患者并無益處。

皮特曼說,在新冠疫情期間,財力充足的大型醫院招聘的護士已經足夠。然而為新冠病毒易感人群提供治療的小型醫院,例如圣胡安地區醫院(San Juan Regional),一家只有250張床位的社區醫院,想穩住員工并花錢聘請旅行護士就很困難。

花錢請旅行護士會嚴重影響醫院的底線,也會影響護理質量。2021年,美國醫療保健人才和保留機構NSI護理解決方案公司(NSI Nursing Solutions)對超過3000家醫院進行調查后估計,醫院如果能夠少請20位旅行護士,平均就可以節省300萬美元。

醫院與全職員工的關系也因此遇到了挑戰。皮特曼告訴《財富》雜志,在新冠疫情期間,醫院廣泛聘請旅行護士,全職護士們不禁想問,為什么醫院不愿意花錢為他們提高待遇,多招一些全職護士減輕負擔。“結果陷入了士氣低落的惡性循環。”皮特曼說。

很多護理人員精疲力竭且負擔過重,不斷有人離開行業,或者像莫格勒一樣轉向旅行護士。“如果普通護士每小時掙50美元,而旅行護士每小時掙150美元,差距就實在太大了。”全美黑人護士協會(National Black Nurses Association)的主席瑪莎·道森說。“我不能因此反對旅行護士,只能說現有制度為他們提供了很強的賺錢能力。”

“郁積之火”

匹茲堡大學(University of Pittsburgh)的護理學博士后朱厄爾·斯科特認為,新冠疫情爆發前的護理行業仿佛郁積之火。如果一直觀察該行業,就會發現諸如全職員工比例過低、責任不斷增加和缺乏制度支持等問題熱度不斷上升。然而如果離得遠一些,是無法發現的。“新冠疫情爆發像有人在火上倒了一桶汽油。”斯科特說。

曾經幾乎所有護士都要學習一年獲得資格證書,也就是LPN,執業護士執照,整個職業生涯都在一兩家機構度過。過去40年里,隨著醫療普遍更加高科技和專業化,護理專業化程度顯著提高。如今,大多數美國護士都獲得了三年制學位,然后成為注冊護士,很多人還會繼續深造。很多人成了能夠在無醫生監督時工作的執業護士,獲得例如護士麻醉師等更專業的職位,有些護士甚至攻讀博士學位,然后進入學術界。

各項因素都意味著,作為醫院和療養院主力的急癥護理注冊護士供應比過去少得多。布爾豪斯表示:“總是存在缺護士的情況”,而導致本地短缺的因素可能是,某個科室有幾名護士同時休育兒假,或者被競爭對手醫院挖走。

但過去幾十年的趨勢加劇了結構性短缺,全美護理人員體系更加脆弱。在注冊護士中,有相當一部分是嬰兒潮一代。自2000年達到頂峰以來,很多護士已經退休。在新冠疫情爆發前,每年約有70000名護士退休。

如果從勞動力總數來看,這個比例并不高。“但是如果考慮到很多具有20年、30年工作經驗的老人離開,需要替換人員數字就很大了。”布爾豪斯說。在過去幾年里,他和同事一直聽到醫院抱怨,在復雜且要求高的領域里,例如重癥監護和急診護理科室,想招聘經驗豐富的護士很困難。

根據美國勞工統計局的數據,目前全美正在從業的注冊護士約有308萬人。預計到2030年,需求將增長9%,也就是缺近30萬名護士。但在今年4月,美國護理學院協會(American Association of Colleges of Nursing)的報告稱,盡管勞動力主體逐漸退休,對護士的需求也在增長,但去年全美各地的護理學校拒絕了超過6萬名的合格申請者。

主要原因是護理學校師資力量不足,尤其是有色人種師資。斯科特指出,全職護理教授里有色人種占比不到10%。大約四分之一的護士都是有色人種。研究表明,無論學生的種族如何,如果能夠向多民族文化背景的人學習,成績就會更好。有色人種的學生受益更大,因為有機會獲得分享自己經歷的教師指導,歸屬感也更強。

從斯科特的經歷來看,她說有一位黑人護理教授瑪瓦·普萊斯曾經主動與她討論攻讀研究生的問題,激勵她爭取更高學歷,并最終成為護理教授。“毫無疑問,支持非常重要。”她說。

培訓護士不僅僅在教室里。加州大學舊金山分校衛生政策研究所(UCSF Institute for Health Policy)的所長喬安妮·斯佩茨說,很少有醫院向護士在職培訓投資,現在身兼重負的老護士們紛紛離開,極其重要的實踐教學存在缺失。

當新冠疫情來襲時,種種背后的問題變得非常緊迫。“極其狹窄的專業迅速出現壓倒性需求,醫院均受到沖擊。”布爾豪斯說。實習護士、新手護士被迫跟隨留下的經驗豐富護士一起提供重癥護理。這是惡性循環。“人員編制不足導致護士流失,而護士流失導致編制減少。”美國重癥護理護士協會(American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)最近發表的一篇評論稱。這一循環在新冠疫情期間愈加棘手。麥肯錫公司(McKinsey & Company)最近一項調查表明,美國22%的護士計劃未來兩年內可能不再從事直接護理病人的工作。參與調查的300多名受訪者面臨的首要問題是:人員不足。“在新冠疫情期間,以往相對安全的照顧病人數量被拉到極限。”密歇根大學(University of Michigan)的護理教授蘇·安妮·貝爾說,她專門研究防災領域,新冠疫情期間,曾經在社區工作了四個月。

除了降低護士的工作滿意度,人員流動也明顯增加了勞動力成本。NSI的報告發現,2021年,每失去一位注冊護士的平均成本為40038美元,而且單個損失會迅速累積。一家醫院人員輪換率每降低一個百分點,每年平均能夠節省270800美元。最近一組研究人員在一項定量研究中寫道,護士輪換也會降低護理質量。“用藥錯誤、跌倒或其他與護士相關的情況出現幾率可能增加,其中也包括醫療相關感染。”

“全美危機”

從這個意義上說,旅行護士造成了棘手的問題。雖然旅行護士提升了小部分極度疲累護士的地位,也能夠提供一定安慰,然而導致的問題也更加嚴重,讓護理工作從一開始就變困難。美國公共衛生協會(Public Health Association)的主席喬治·本杰明表示,導致當前危機的長期問題并不會迅速消失。他說,各項問題可以隨著時間推移逐步解決,不過需要持續努力。

但解決問題的第一步是承認問題存在。9月1日,美國護士協會(American Nurses Association)向美國衛生與公共服務部(Department of Health and Human Service)的部長澤維爾·貝塞拉提交了一封信。協會請貝塞拉宣布“全國護士出現人員危機,并立即采取措施制定并實施短期和長期解決方案。”

“我們非常盼望很快收到貝塞拉部長的回復。”信件提交一周后,美國護士協會的主席歐內斯特·格蘭特對《財富》雜志表示。截至12月本文發布時,該協會仍未收到回應。

至于離開全職崗位成為旅行護士的莫格勒,對自己的選擇也很糾結。他說:“離開病情嚴重急需護理的病人,人手嚴重不足的醫院,還有無法像我一樣轉型的同事們,我感覺并不好。”

但是,工作量太大存在風險,他和同事也感覺不到醫院的支持,這些都是他選擇離開的重要原因。他說:“我會一份合同一份合同地工作,直到沒有什么錢可賺,或者情況開始改善,全職護士工作的吸引力提高了再說。”(財富中文網)

譯者:梁宇

審校:夏林

當新冠疫情開始時,杰西·莫格勒擔任急診室護士還不到一年。他說,那段時間里他在美國新墨西哥州法明頓市的圣胡安地區醫療中心(San Juan Regional Medical Center)繁忙的急診室工作,當時就有旅行護士,每個班次可能一到兩人。旅行護士的經驗往往不如全職護士,幫助他們適應急診室的做事方式也要資深護士花費不少時間。盡管如此,旅行護士還是很有幫助,尤其是人們不喜歡的晚班。

等到一年后他離開時,新冠病毒的傳播已經呈現出燎原之勢,醫院里也到處是旅行護士,尤其是晚班和夜班。他說,有時甚至是半夜負責統管各項事務的主管護士也是“旅行護士”。

莫格勒2018年畢業于護理學校,他發現自己正在迅速變成業內經驗最豐富的護士之一。當時他需要照顧的病人數量比以往任何時候都多,有時還負責6到10個急診病例。

莫格勒說,在學校里,老師不斷強調,分配給護士的病人如果出現可以預防的事故或死亡,護士就可能面臨質詢甚至撤銷護理執照,更別提知曉自己為不必要的痛苦承擔責任帶來的創傷。“我們越發感覺到,每次上班都在努力避免創傷性事故、創傷或危重病人,阻止不必要的死亡。”他說。“病人很危險,當護士也很危險。”

為了給日漸耗盡精力的工作爭取更高薪水(也是為了盡快擺脫感覺不安全的環境),莫格勒在旅行護士求職公告欄上發布了消息,而且很快就收到了大量招聘短信和語音郵件。今年10月,他開始聯系招聘方,決定前往新墨西哥州的杜蘭戈工作到2021年年底,每小時的收入是全職護士的四倍。

從早期的呼吸機短缺到如今無休止拖延的常規程序,新冠病毒對醫療行業的影響非常廣泛。但最顯著的影響之一是對照顧病人的職業市場的影響。對愿意為出價最高者工作的人們而言,旅行護士需求激增大幅提升了其工資。基于過去90天內59000份活躍招聘職位的信息,醫療保健工作委員會(Healthcare job board)的維維安估計,目前美國旅行注冊護士的平均工資幾乎達到每周3200美元。按照維維安的說法,平均每周工作36小時的旅行護士的時薪近90美元。根據美國勞工統計局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的數據,這一水平是2020年美國護理人員時薪中位數的兩倍多。但一些人表示,人員輪換破壞了醫院穩定,而即將進入新冠疫情第三年的醫護人員已經瀕臨崩潰。隨著冬季疫情病例激增,奧密克戎變異毒株來勢洶洶,再加上流感季的到來,重癥監護室紛紛開始補充人手,協助醫院運行的不穩定系統將面臨挑戰。

成為“旅行護士”

蒙大拿州立大學(Montana State University)的護理政策專家彼得·布爾豪斯稱,早在20世紀70年代,旅行護士就已經存在。“這群人從來都不是護士隊伍的重要組成部分。”他說。該領域一度被用來填補局部護士短缺,在新冠疫情爆發前就開始增長。市場研究機構Grand View Research于2020年年初發布的一份市場報告稱,僅2019年一年,旅行護士市場就增長了7%,部分原因是醫院正在削減全職員工成本。

自新冠疫情爆發以來,旅行護士的市場規模不斷增長。據Staffing Industry Analysts告訴估計,2020年,美國旅行護士人力資源行業增長了35%,從2019年的62億美元增至84億美元。Staffing Industry Analysts預計到2021年年底,這一市場將進一步擴大40%,達到118億美元。

“雖然2020年和2021年的旅行護士人數增長迅速,但市場規模增長在很大程度上是因為需求與供給不平衡導致工資的大幅上升。”Staffing Industry Analysts的北美研究主管蒂莫西·蘭德胡伊斯說。

Facebook(已改名為Meta——編注)的活躍群組“周薪至少5000美元的旅行護士工作”(Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up)的成員超過10萬人,招聘人員發布的信息和帖子非常多。不管是招聘網站還是Facebook小組,都是旅行護士找工作的主要方式。AMN Healthcare是美國最大的醫療人才公司之一,今年5月,公司的首席執行官蘇珊·薩爾卡在美國銀行(Bank of America)的醫療狀況虛擬會議上表示,該公司的業務主要依靠口碑來推動。

在新冠疫情期間,醫療人才公司的收入相當可觀。AMN Healthcare的2021年三季報中收入相比2020年增幅達60%。另一家知名公司Cross Country Healthcare的業績增長更加明顯,2021年三季度同比增幅達93%。

通常來說,旅行護士只能夠在護理執照有效的特定州或地區工作。喬治·華盛頓大學(George Washington University)的衛生人力研究中心(Health Workforce Research Center)的主任波利·皮特曼說,第一波疫情期間,州政府放松了限制,旅行護理的案例也為人才跨州流動至最需要的地方工作提供了框架。到第三波疫情時,新冠病毒已經無處不在,護士仍然可以自由選擇工作地點。競價大戰隨后爆發。

“我認為旅行護士具有重要的作用,如果適度的話。”皮特曼說。大量研究表明,如果過多聘用旅行護士,對醫院底線、員工士氣或患者并無益處。

皮特曼說,在新冠疫情期間,財力充足的大型醫院招聘的護士已經足夠。然而為新冠病毒易感人群提供治療的小型醫院,例如圣胡安地區醫院(San Juan Regional),一家只有250張床位的社區醫院,想穩住員工并花錢聘請旅行護士就很困難。

花錢請旅行護士會嚴重影響醫院的底線,也會影響護理質量。2021年,美國醫療保健人才和保留機構NSI護理解決方案公司(NSI Nursing Solutions)對超過3000家醫院進行調查后估計,醫院如果能夠少請20位旅行護士,平均就可以節省300萬美元。

醫院與全職員工的關系也因此遇到了挑戰。皮特曼告訴《財富》雜志,在新冠疫情期間,醫院廣泛聘請旅行護士,全職護士們不禁想問,為什么醫院不愿意花錢為他們提高待遇,多招一些全職護士減輕負擔。“結果陷入了士氣低落的惡性循環。”皮特曼說。

很多護理人員精疲力竭且負擔過重,不斷有人離開行業,或者像莫格勒一樣轉向旅行護士。“如果普通護士每小時掙50美元,而旅行護士每小時掙150美元,差距就實在太大了。”全美黑人護士協會(National Black Nurses Association)的主席瑪莎·道森說。“我不能因此反對旅行護士,只能說現有制度為他們提供了很強的賺錢能力。”

“郁積之火”

匹茲堡大學(University of Pittsburgh)的護理學博士后朱厄爾·斯科特認為,新冠疫情爆發前的護理行業仿佛郁積之火。如果一直觀察該行業,就會發現諸如全職員工比例過低、責任不斷增加和缺乏制度支持等問題熱度不斷上升。然而如果離得遠一些,是無法發現的。“新冠疫情爆發像有人在火上倒了一桶汽油。”斯科特說。

曾經幾乎所有護士都要學習一年獲得資格證書,也就是LPN,執業護士執照,整個職業生涯都在一兩家機構度過。過去40年里,隨著醫療普遍更加高科技和專業化,護理專業化程度顯著提高。如今,大多數美國護士都獲得了三年制學位,然后成為注冊護士,很多人還會繼續深造。很多人成了能夠在無醫生監督時工作的執業護士,獲得例如護士麻醉師等更專業的職位,有些護士甚至攻讀博士學位,然后進入學術界。

各項因素都意味著,作為醫院和療養院主力的急癥護理注冊護士供應比過去少得多。布爾豪斯表示:“總是存在缺護士的情況”,而導致本地短缺的因素可能是,某個科室有幾名護士同時休育兒假,或者被競爭對手醫院挖走。

但過去幾十年的趨勢加劇了結構性短缺,全美護理人員體系更加脆弱。在注冊護士中,有相當一部分是嬰兒潮一代。自2000年達到頂峰以來,很多護士已經退休。在新冠疫情爆發前,每年約有70000名護士退休。

如果從勞動力總數來看,這個比例并不高。“但是如果考慮到很多具有20年、30年工作經驗的老人離開,需要替換人員數字就很大了。”布爾豪斯說。在過去幾年里,他和同事一直聽到醫院抱怨,在復雜且要求高的領域里,例如重癥監護和急診護理科室,想招聘經驗豐富的護士很困難。

根據美國勞工統計局的數據,目前全美正在從業的注冊護士約有308萬人。預計到2030年,需求將增長9%,也就是缺近30萬名護士。但在今年4月,美國護理學院協會(American Association of Colleges of Nursing)的報告稱,盡管勞動力主體逐漸退休,對護士的需求也在增長,但去年全美各地的護理學校拒絕了超過6萬名的合格申請者。

主要原因是護理學校師資力量不足,尤其是有色人種師資。斯科特指出,全職護理教授里有色人種占比不到10%。大約四分之一的護士都是有色人種。研究表明,無論學生的種族如何,如果能夠向多民族文化背景的人學習,成績就會更好。有色人種的學生受益更大,因為有機會獲得分享自己經歷的教師指導,歸屬感也更強。

從斯科特的經歷來看,她說有一位黑人護理教授瑪瓦·普萊斯曾經主動與她討論攻讀研究生的問題,激勵她爭取更高學歷,并最終成為護理教授。“毫無疑問,支持非常重要。”她說。

培訓護士不僅僅在教室里。加州大學舊金山分校衛生政策研究所(UCSF Institute for Health Policy)的所長喬安妮·斯佩茨說,很少有醫院向護士在職培訓投資,現在身兼重負的老護士們紛紛離開,極其重要的實踐教學存在缺失。

當新冠疫情來襲時,種種背后的問題變得非常緊迫。“極其狹窄的專業迅速出現壓倒性需求,醫院均受到沖擊。”布爾豪斯說。實習護士、新手護士被迫跟隨留下的經驗豐富護士一起提供重癥護理。這是惡性循環。“人員編制不足導致護士流失,而護士流失導致編制減少。”美國重癥護理護士協會(American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)最近發表的一篇評論稱。這一循環在新冠疫情期間愈加棘手。麥肯錫公司(McKinsey & Company)最近一項調查表明,美國22%的護士計劃未來兩年內可能不再從事直接護理病人的工作。參與調查的300多名受訪者面臨的首要問題是:人員不足。“在新冠疫情期間,以往相對安全的照顧病人數量被拉到極限。”密歇根大學(University of Michigan)的護理教授蘇·安妮·貝爾說,她專門研究防災領域,新冠疫情期間,曾經在社區工作了四個月。

除了降低護士的工作滿意度,人員流動也明顯增加了勞動力成本。NSI的報告發現,2021年,每失去一位注冊護士的平均成本為40038美元,而且單個損失會迅速累積。一家醫院人員輪換率每降低一個百分點,每年平均能夠節省270800美元。最近一組研究人員在一項定量研究中寫道,護士輪換也會降低護理質量。“用藥錯誤、跌倒或其他與護士相關的情況出現幾率可能增加,其中也包括醫療相關感染。”

“全美危機”

從這個意義上說,旅行護士造成了棘手的問題。雖然旅行護士提升了小部分極度疲累護士的地位,也能夠提供一定安慰,然而導致的問題也更加嚴重,讓護理工作從一開始就變困難。美國公共衛生協會(Public Health Association)的主席喬治·本杰明表示,導致當前危機的長期問題并不會迅速消失。他說,各項問題可以隨著時間推移逐步解決,不過需要持續努力。

但解決問題的第一步是承認問題存在。9月1日,美國護士協會(American Nurses Association)向美國衛生與公共服務部(Department of Health and Human Service)的部長澤維爾·貝塞拉提交了一封信。協會請貝塞拉宣布“全國護士出現人員危機,并立即采取措施制定并實施短期和長期解決方案。”

“我們非常盼望很快收到貝塞拉部長的回復。”信件提交一周后,美國護士協會的主席歐內斯特·格蘭特對《財富》雜志表示。截至12月本文發布時,該協會仍未收到回應。

至于離開全職崗位成為旅行護士的莫格勒,對自己的選擇也很糾結。他說:“離開病情嚴重急需護理的病人,人手嚴重不足的醫院,還有無法像我一樣轉型的同事們,我感覺并不好。”

但是,工作量太大存在風險,他和同事也感覺不到醫院的支持,這些都是他選擇離開的重要原因。他說:“我會一份合同一份合同地工作,直到沒有什么錢可賺,或者情況開始改善,全職護士工作的吸引力提高了再說。”(財富中文網)

譯者:梁宇

審校:夏林

Jesse Mogler had been working as an emergency room nurse for less than a year when the pandemic started. During that time, he says, he worked with travel nurses—maybe one or two per shift—in the busy ER of San Juan Regional Medical Center in Farmington, N.M. They were often less experienced than staff nurses, he says, and helping to orient them to the practices of the specific ER took time from more senior nurses on the floor. Still, the travel nurses were helpful, especially on the unpopular late shifts.

By the time he left, over a year later, the COVID-19 pandemic was in full swing, and the floor was primarily staffed by travel nurses—especially during the evening and overnight shifts. By midnight, he says, sometimes even the nurse in charge of running everything—known, appropriately, as the charge nurse—was a “traveler.”

Mogler, who finished nursing school in 2018, found that he was rapidly becoming one of the most experienced nurses on the floor. He was charged with looking after a higher number of patients than ever before, sometimes overseeing six to 10 emergency cases, he says.

In school, he says, teachers constantly reinforce that preventable accidents or deaths among the patients a nurse is assigned to can result in an inquest and the loss of your nursing license—to say nothing of the trauma of knowing you had a role in unnecessary suffering. “It increasingly felt like every shift, we [were] about one traumatic accident, one trauma or critical patient away from unnecessary deaths,” he says. “It was risky to be a patient. It was risky to be a nurse.”

Looking for higher compensation for an increasingly draining job (as well as the ability to move on quickly from an environment that felt unsafe), he posted on a travel nurse job board and got a rush of text messages and voicemails from recruiters. He started his first contact in October and will be working in Durango, N.M., until the end of 2021—making four times the hourly rate he made as a staff nurse.

COVID has transformed many aspects of health care—from early ventilator shortages to endlessly delayed routine procedures. But one of the most striking effects the virus has had is on the career market for the people that care for you. The explosion of travel nurses has massively increased pay for those willing to work for the highest bidder. Healthcare job board Vivian estimates that the average travel RN salary in the U.S. is presently almost $3,200 per week, based on 59,000 active job listings in the past 90 days. That works out to almost $90 per hour for the average 36-hour travel nursing week, according to Vivian. It's also more than twice the median hourly pay of a staff nurse in the United States in 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But a rotating cast of for-hire staffers has also, some say, destabilized hospitals where employees soon entering year three of the pandemic were already at a breaking point. As ICUs begin to fill up again with a winter COVID-19 surge and the Omicron variant, as well as flu season, this shaky system keeping hospitals afloat will be put to the test.

Becoming a “traveler”

Travel nurses were around as far back as the 1970s, says Peter Buerhaus, a nursing policy expert from Montana State University. “They have never been a large component of the nursing workforce,” he says. The field, once used to bridge brief localized nursing shortages, started growing pre-pandemic: A market report from Grand View Research published in early 2020 found that in 2019 alone the market for travel nurses grew by 7%, driven in part by hospitals’ ongoing attempts to cut permanent-staffing costs.

The market has ballooned in size since the pandemic began. Staffing Industry Analysts (SIA) estimates that the U.S. travel nurse staffing industry grew 35% in 2020, from $6.2 billion in 2019 to $8.4 billion. By the end of 2021, SIA predicts a further 40% expansion, to $11.8 billion.

“While the volume of travel nurses on assignment grew in 2020 and 2021, much of the market size growth has been due to large increases in pay rates due to the imbalance of demand with supply,” notes Timothy Landhuis, North America director of research at SIA.

The active Facebook group “Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up” has more than 100,000 members and is peppered with listings and posts from recruiters. Job boards and groups like the Facebook group are the main ways that travel nurses find work. The business of AMN Healthcare, one of the largest health care staffing firms, is driven predominantly by word of mouth, CEO Susan Salka told a Bank of America virtual conference on the state of health care in May.

Health care staffing firms have posted impressive returns during the pandemic. AMN reported a whopping 60% bump in revenue over 2020 in its third quarter 2021. Cross Country Healthcare, another prominent firm, was even higher, with a 93% year-over-year increase in Q3 2021.

Usually, travel nurses are restricted to the specific states or regions where their nursing licenses are valid. During the first wave of the pandemic, those restrictions were waived by state governments, and travel nursing provided a framework to move people across state lines to where they were needed most, says Polly Pittman, director of the Health Workforce Research Center at George Washington University. By the time of the third wave, when COVID-19 was ubiquitous, nurses could still work almost anywhere. A bidding war ensued.

“I think travel nurses have an important function, in moderation,” says Pittman. But a large body of research shows that overuse of travel nurses isn’t good—for hospital bottom lines, for staff morale, or for patients.

During the pandemic, big hospital systems that can afford to pay have been able to hire the nurses they needed, says Pittman. Smaller health care facilities that provide care to some of those most vulnerable to COVID-19—like San Juan Regional, a community hospital with about 250 beds—have struggled to maintain staff and find the funds to pay for travelers.

Paying travel nurses has a serious effect on hospital bottom lines, which also impacts quality of care. NSI Nursing Solutions, a national health care staffing and retention agency, conducted a survey of over 3,000 hospitals in 2021 and estimated that hospitals could save an average of $3 million for every 20 travel nurse positions eliminated.

And it hurts relationships with the regular workforce. The widespread use of travel nurses during this pandemic has left staff nurses asking why hospitals can’t find the money to pay them better and hire more staff nurses to reduce their load, multiple sources including Pittman told Fortune. “It creates this downward spiral of low morale,” Pittman says.

Exhausted and overburdened, many staff nurses are leaving the profession altogether or, like Mogler, turning to travel nursing. “If you have a regular nurse making $50 an hour and a travel nurse making $150 an hour, that’s a big gap,” says Martha Dawson, president of the National Black Nurses Association. “I can’t hold that against the nurse, because for them that’s the current system that provides them with earning power.”

“A smoldering fire”

Jewel Scott, a postdoctoral nursing scholar at the University of Pittsburgh, compares nursing before the pandemic to a smoldering fire. If you were right beside the profession, you could see the heat of issues like low staffing ratios, ever-increasing responsibilities, and lack of institutional support flickering. Farther away, though, they were invisible. “Then COVID-19 hit, and [it was like] somebody poured a gallon of gasoline on the fire,” Scott says.

Once upon a time, nearly all nurses got a single one-year qualification—known as the LPN, or licensed practical nurse—and spent their entire career at one or two facilities. Nursing has professionalized significantly in the past 40 years, as health care generally has become more high-tech and specialized. Today, most American nurses get a three-year degree, which makes them RNs, or registered nurses, and many go on to further qualifications. They can become nurse practitioners, who work without the supervision of a doctor, go into more specialized positions like nurse anesthetist, and some even get Ph.D.s and go into academia.

All of those factors mean that acute care RNs, the mainstay of hospital and nursing home staffing, are in much shorter supply than they used to be. “There are always background shortages of nurses,” says Buerhaus. Local shortages can result from factors like several nurses on a ward all going on parental leave at the same time, or poaching by a competitor hospital, he says.

But trends in the past few decades have exacerbated structural shortages—and made the national workforce more vulnerable. The baby boomers who make up the bulk of the RN workforce have been retiring in large numbers since their generational workforce peaked in 2000. Pre-pandemic, about 70,000 of these nurses retired per year.

As a fraction of the total workforce, that’s not a huge percentage. “But when you think about the 20 and 30 years of experience that are leaving the workforce, that’s a big number to replace,” Buerhaus says. For the past few years, he and his colleagues have been hearing from hospitals that experienced nurses in complicated, demanding areas like intensive care and emergency care have been difficult to hire.

At present, about 3.08 million registered nurses are employed around the country, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Demand is predicted to grow by 9% by 2030—that means almost 300,000 nurses. But even though the mainstay of the labor force is retiring and demand for nurses is growing, nursing schools around the country are turning away qualified applicants—over 60,000 last year, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing reported in April.

There just aren’t enough faculty available to staff nursing schools—especially faculty who are people of color. They make up less than 10% of full nursing professors, Scott notes. About one-quarter of nurses identify as people of color. Studies show that outcomes are better for students who learn from people with a mix of ethnocultural backgrounds, regardless of the student's race. Students who are people of color especially benefit because they have the opportunity to be mentored by people who share their lived experiences and feel more like they belong.

In her case, Scott says having a Black nursing professor, Marva Price, reach out to talk to her about pursuing graduate studies led her to seek out further qualifications and eventually become a nursing professor herself. "Without a doubt, representation matters," she says.

And training nurses isn’t just about what happens in the classroom. Few hospitals have invested in nurse training on the job, says Joanne Spetz, director of the UCSF Institute for Health Policy studies. Now that the older nurses who were carrying so much weight are leaving, she says, there’s nobody who can do that vital teaching.

When the pandemic hit, these background issues became an urgent problem. “Hospitals were hit by this very fast, overwhelming demand for this very narrow specialty,” Buerhaus says. Trainee nurses and novice nurses were pressed into service in critical care, alongside the experienced nurses who remained. It’s a vicious cycle. “Poor staffing causes nurse attrition, and nurse attrition sustains poor staffing,” reads a recent commentary from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. This cycle has become more intractable during COVID-19. A recent McKinsey & Company survey suggests that as many as 22% of the country’s nurses may plan to leave direct patient care in the next two years. The top issue for the survey’s more than 300 respondents: insufficient staffing. “During the pandemic, what is considered to be a safe number of patients to care for has been stretched to the absolute limit,” says Sue Anne Bell, a University of Michigan nursing professor who specializes in disaster preparedness and has been deployed to communities for four months during the pandemic.

In addition to lowering nurse job satisfaction, turnover dramatically increases labor force costs. Each RN lost to a hospital costs on average $40,038 in 2021, the NSI report finds. Those individual losses add up quickly: With each percentage point a hospital improves its turnover rate, it saves an average of $270,800 annually. Nurse turnover also detracts from quality of care, a team of researchers wrote in a recent quantitative study, “with potentially increased rates of medication errors, falls, or other nurse-sensitive outcomes including health care–associated infections.”

A “national crisis”

In that sense, travel nursing has created a tricky problem: While it elevates and provides relief for a small subset of burned-out nurses, it magnifies the issues making the job so hard in the first place. The long-standing issues that paved the way for the current crisis also aren't going away anytime soon, says Georges Benjamin, president of the American Public Health Association. They could be solved over time, he says, although it would take sustained effort.

But the first step in solving a problem is acknowledging that it exists. On Sept.1, the American Nurses Association submitted a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra. The association asked him to declare “a national nurse staffing crisis and take immediate steps to develop and implement both short- and long-term solutions.”

“We do hope to hear from Secretary Becerra soon,” ANA president Ernest Grant told Fortune a week after the letter was submitted As of this article's publication in December, the ANA had received no response.

As for Mogler, the nurse that left his staff job for a travel position, he struggles with his choice. “I don’t feel great having left a very sick and needy population in a very understaffed hospital and coworkers who…were not able to take the same transition I did,” he says.

But the risk of handling a too-big workload and the feeling that his hospital wasn’t supporting him or his colleagues were too big an incentive to leave. As it is, he says, “I’m going to transition from one contract to the next until either the money is no longer worthwhile or situations start to improve and staff nursing becomes more appealing.”

財富中文網所刊載內容之知識產權為財富媒體知識產權有限公司及/或相關權利人專屬所有或持有。未經許可,禁止進行轉載、摘編、復制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財富Plus APP

前往打開

            主站蜘蛛池模板: 滦南县| 开原市| 松滋市| 年辖:市辖区| 绥化市| 全椒县| 保康县| 临沂市| 深水埗区| 彭山县| 奉节县| 汕头市| 崇义县| 桂平市| 启东市| 萍乡市| 宜章县| 汉阴县| 云南省| 曲靖市| 永仁县| 福建省| 贵州省| 新邵县| 四川省| 鄢陵县| 玉环县| 望都县| 诸城市| 大田县| 葵青区| 友谊县| 贡嘎县| 横山县| 阳谷县| 晋宁县| 社旗县| 杭锦后旗| 克山县| 枣强县| 清远市|