如今,新冠加強針疫苗引發了激烈爭論。爭論的焦點不僅在于是否以及在什么時間有必要接種加強針,人們還在討論加強針背后的基本道德問題。
這是因為富裕國家目前正在考慮采用類似于流感的模式推行施打加強針疫苗,但其他國家的疫苗供應依舊捉襟見肘。
全世界近四分之一的人口已經至少接種了一劑新冠疫苗,但疫苗分配并不平等。高收入和中等以上收入國家共施打了85%的疫苗,這些國家財力雄厚,讓它們可以領先于其他國家。而低收入國家僅施打了0.3%的疫苗。
因此,美國已經有48%的人口完成疫苗接種,歐洲也有足夠的疫苗供應,但貧困國家的疫苗接種工作才剛剛啟動。孟加拉國的外交部部長阿卜杜勒?莫門在幾周前曾經抱怨:“富裕國家正在囤積疫苗。它們獲得的疫苗是實際需求的幾倍。”孟加拉國只有2.6%的人口完成了疫苗接種。
他的說法沒有錯。歐盟到2023年能夠人均施打6.6劑疫苗。鑒于歐盟到7月底將有70%的成年人接種疫苗,因此這些疫苗大部分是加強針疫苗。
“令人羞愧”
世界衛生組織(World Health Organization)直言不諱地批評了疫苗分配不公的后果,并希望富裕國家將額外的疫苗轉讓給其他國家,而不是考慮施打加強針。
世界衛生組織的總干事譚德塞在7月12日稱:“全球疫苗分配不均,供應極不平等,當一些國家還未能為其衛生工作者和最弱勢群體接種疫苗時,另一些國家和地區卻訂購了數百萬劑的疫苗加強針。”
雖然譚德塞表示,即使在接種率較高的國家,德爾塔新冠變種病毒“也再次給衛生體系帶來了壓力”,但他補充說:“在疫苗接種率較低的國家,情況尤其糟糕。德爾塔變種病毒以及其他高傳染性變種病毒,導致新一波嚴重疫情,住院治療和死亡人數激增。”
譚德塞指出:“諸位,你們是否會將沒有穿戴任何防護裝備的消防員派到一線?在新冠疫情中,最脆弱的是誰?是奮戰在一線的醫護人員、老年人和弱勢群體。我們現在卻在有意識地選擇不為最需要幫助的人們提供保護;將‘消防員’的安危置于不顧。”
世界衛生組織的突發衛生事件規劃執行主任邁克?瑞恩更加直白地表示,如果各國開始在短期內施打加強針疫苗,“當我們回首往事的時候將感到憤怒和羞愧。有些人想要占盡好處,卻還不知足。”
將道德問題放在一邊,從現實方面考慮,如果任由病毒在沒有疫苗保護的人群中傳播,它將有更高的概率發生變異,在富裕國家引發混亂,例如最早在印度發現的德爾塔變種病毒導致歐洲經濟重啟的趨勢突然反轉。
關于免疫力減弱的爭論
然而,就像每年接種的流感疫苗一樣,在藥企推出特別針對變異毒株做出調整的新版疫苗之前,最初開發加強針疫苗的初衷,一定程度上就是為了應對這些變種病毒。
由于德爾塔變種病毒的出現,泰國和阿聯酋等國家已經開始向完成接種科興、國藥和阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)疫苗的民眾,提供第三劑疫苗。
盡管輝瑞(Pfizer)/BioNTech以及Moderna的信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗更有效,但藥廠也一直在考慮加強針疫苗的必要性。
在疫苗接種率較高的地區,尤其是以色列,德爾塔變種病毒導致感染人數激增。以色列主要接種輝瑞/BioNTech疫苗。輝瑞解釋稱,這種現象證明抗體效果正在減弱。該公司目前正在向美國的藥品監管機構申請批準加強針疫苗,最快可在首次接種六個月后施打,盡管其依據的數據來自一項僅涉及20多人的研究。
輝瑞的研究負責人米卡埃爾?多爾斯滕在上周說:“我們相信,加強針對德爾塔變種病毒非常有效。”
但即便在以色列,政府在施打加強針疫苗方面也非常謹慎。以色列已經開始為極度脆弱的群體接種第三劑輝瑞/BioNTech疫苗。以色列的衛生部高級顧問蘭?巴利塞在7月12日指出,目前依舊沒有“免疫力減弱的證據”,并且在大范圍施打加強針疫苗之前,必須排除“導致目前確診病例增加的其他潛在原因”。
據《紐約時報》(New York Times)在7月12日的報道,美國政府官員也希望在看到更多證據之后,再授權施打加強針疫苗。
輝瑞和BioNTech在上周發布的一份聲明中稱:“基于到目前為止掌握的全部數據,輝瑞和BioNTech認為,第三劑疫苗將有助于保持最高的防護水平。”
輝瑞的一位發言人在7月13日補充說:“我們正在攜手各國政府以及全球衛生合作伙伴,共同推動新冠疫苗的公平和平等分配,同時利用我們的專業知識和資源開發創新方法,幫助加強需要更多支持的醫療保健體系。”(財富中文網)
翻譯:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
如今,新冠加強針疫苗引發了激烈爭論。爭論的焦點不僅在于是否以及在什么時間有必要接種加強針,人們還在討論加強針背后的基本道德問題。
這是因為富裕國家目前正在考慮采用類似于流感的模式推行施打加強針疫苗,但其他國家的疫苗供應依舊捉襟見肘。
全世界近四分之一的人口已經至少接種了一劑新冠疫苗,但疫苗分配并不平等。高收入和中等以上收入國家共施打了85%的疫苗,這些國家財力雄厚,讓它們可以領先于其他國家。而低收入國家僅施打了0.3%的疫苗。
因此,美國已經有48%的人口完成疫苗接種,歐洲也有足夠的疫苗供應,但貧困國家的疫苗接種工作才剛剛啟動。孟加拉國的外交部部長阿卜杜勒?莫門在幾周前曾經抱怨:“富裕國家正在囤積疫苗。它們獲得的疫苗是實際需求的幾倍。”孟加拉國只有2.6%的人口完成了疫苗接種。
他的說法沒有錯。歐盟到2023年能夠人均施打6.6劑疫苗。鑒于歐盟到7月底將有70%的成年人接種疫苗,因此這些疫苗大部分是加強針疫苗。
“令人羞愧”
世界衛生組織(World Health Organization)直言不諱地批評了疫苗分配不公的后果,并希望富裕國家將額外的疫苗轉讓給其他國家,而不是考慮施打加強針。
世界衛生組織的總干事譚德塞在7月12日稱:“全球疫苗分配不均,供應極不平等,當一些國家還未能為其衛生工作者和最弱勢群體接種疫苗時,另一些國家和地區卻訂購了數百萬劑的疫苗加強針。”
雖然譚德塞表示,即使在接種率較高的國家,德爾塔新冠變種病毒“也再次給衛生體系帶來了壓力”,但他補充說:“在疫苗接種率較低的國家,情況尤其糟糕。德爾塔變種病毒以及其他高傳染性變種病毒,導致新一波嚴重疫情,住院治療和死亡人數激增。”
譚德塞指出:“諸位,你們是否會將沒有穿戴任何防護裝備的消防員派到一線?在新冠疫情中,最脆弱的是誰?是奮戰在一線的醫護人員、老年人和弱勢群體。我們現在卻在有意識地選擇不為最需要幫助的人們提供保護;將‘消防員’的安危置于不顧。”
世界衛生組織的突發衛生事件規劃執行主任邁克?瑞恩更加直白地表示,如果各國開始在短期內施打加強針疫苗,“當我們回首往事的時候將感到憤怒和羞愧。有些人想要占盡好處,卻還不知足。”
將道德問題放在一邊,從現實方面考慮,如果任由病毒在沒有疫苗保護的人群中傳播,它將有更高的概率發生變異,在富裕國家引發混亂,例如最早在印度發現的德爾塔變種病毒導致歐洲經濟重啟的趨勢突然反轉。
關于免疫力減弱的爭論
然而,就像每年接種的流感疫苗一樣,在藥企推出特別針對變異毒株做出調整的新版疫苗之前,最初開發加強針疫苗的初衷,一定程度上就是為了應對這些變種病毒。
由于德爾塔變種病毒的出現,泰國和阿聯酋等國家已經開始向完成接種科興、國藥和阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)疫苗的民眾,提供第三劑疫苗。
盡管輝瑞(Pfizer)/BioNTech以及Moderna的信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗更有效,但藥廠也一直在考慮加強針疫苗的必要性。
在疫苗接種率較高的地區,尤其是以色列,德爾塔變種病毒導致感染人數激增。以色列主要接種輝瑞/BioNTech疫苗。輝瑞解釋稱,這種現象證明抗體效果正在減弱。該公司目前正在向美國的藥品監管機構申請批準加強針疫苗,最快可在首次接種六個月后施打,盡管其依據的數據來自一項僅涉及20多人的研究。
輝瑞的研究負責人米卡埃爾?多爾斯滕在上周說:“我們相信,加強針對德爾塔變種病毒非常有效。”
但即便在以色列,政府在施打加強針疫苗方面也非常謹慎。以色列已經開始為極度脆弱的群體接種第三劑輝瑞/BioNTech疫苗。以色列的衛生部高級顧問蘭?巴利塞在7月12日指出,目前依舊沒有“免疫力減弱的證據”,并且在大范圍施打加強針疫苗之前,必須排除“導致目前確診病例增加的其他潛在原因”。
據《紐約時報》(New York Times)在7月12日的報道,美國政府官員也希望在看到更多證據之后,再授權施打加強針疫苗。
輝瑞和BioNTech在上周發布的一份聲明中稱:“基于到目前為止掌握的全部數據,輝瑞和BioNTech認為,第三劑疫苗將有助于保持最高的防護水平。”
輝瑞的一位發言人在7月13日補充說:“我們正在攜手各國政府以及全球衛生合作伙伴,共同推動新冠疫苗的公平和平等分配,同時利用我們的專業知識和資源開發創新方法,幫助加強需要更多支持的醫療保健體系。”(財富中文網)
翻譯:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
There is an emerging debate over COVID-19 booster shots. It’s not just about whether and when these extra vaccine doses will become necessary, but also about basic ethics.
That’s because, while rich countries are now talking about moving to a flu-style system of regular boosters, most of the world is still experiencing a huge shortage of vaccines.
Nearly a quarter of the world’s people have received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine, but distribution has been anything but equal. A whopping 85% of vaccine doses have been administered in high- and upper-middle-income countries, whose financial resources allowed them to muscle their way to the front of the queue. But low-income countries have been left with 0.3% of total doses.
So, while the U.S. has fully vaccinated 48% of its population, and Europe is now swimming in vaccines, poorer countries are still barely off the starting blocks. “Rich countries are hoarding vaccines,” complained Bangladeshi Foreign Minister A.K. Abdul Momen, whose country has fully vaccinated 2.6% of its population, a few weeks ago. “They have several times more vaccines than they need.”
He’s not wrong. The EU has secured 6.6 doses for each person through 2023. With the union being on track to vaccinate 70% of its adults by the end of July, most of that is boosters.
“Look back in shame”
The World Health Organization is blunt about the implications, and wants rich countries to send their extra doses to the rest of the world rather than talking about boosters.
“The global gap in COVID-19 vaccine supply is hugely uneven and inequitable. Some countries and regions are actually ordering millions of booster doses, before other countries have had supplies to vaccinate their health workers and most vulnerable,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on July 12.
While Tedros noted how the Delta variant of the coronavirus is “steadily putting pressure back on health systems,” even in countries with high vaccination coverage, he added that “in countries with low vaccine coverage, the situation is particularly bad. Delta and other highly transmissible variants are driving catastrophic waves of COVID-19 cases, which are translating into high numbers of hospitalizations and death.”
“I ask you, who would put firefighters on the front line without protection?” Tedros continued. “Who are the most vulnerable to the flames of the COVID-19 pandemic? The health workers on the front lines, older persons, and the vulnerable. We are making conscious choices right now not to protect those most in need; our own firefighters.”
Mike Ryan, the WHO’s emergencies program chief, put it even more starkly, saying the world will “look back in anger, and we will look back in shame” if countries start rolling out boosters in the near-term. “These are people who want to have their cake and eat it, and then they want to make some more cake and eat it too.”
Morality aside, the practical aspect of this is that, while the virus is allowed to circulate through unprotected people, there is a greater likelihood of it mutating and causing chaos even in richer countries—an effect we’re already seeing with the Delta variant, first identified in India, leading to the sudden rollback of reopenings in Europe.
Waning immunity debate
Yet it is these variants that boosters are in part designed to address—even before the drugmakers release newly tweaked versions of their vaccines that specifically target the new strains, as happens with the annual flu jab.
Thanks to Delta, countries such as Thailand and the UAE are already offering third doses to some people who have received full regimens of Sinovac, [hotlink]Sinopharm,[/hotlink] and AstraZeneca vaccines.
Even with Pfizer/BioNTech’s and Moderna’s more effective messenger-RNA (mRNA) vaccines, the manufacturers have been talking up the need for a booster.
The Delta variant has caused infection surges even in places that have high vaccination rates, notably Israel, whose vaccination campaign has leaned heavily on Pfizer/BioNTech. Pfizer interprets this as evidence of waning antibodies, and is now asking U.S. drug regulators to approve a booster that would be given as soon as six months after the initial vaccination—even though the data supporting its push comes from a study involving fewer than two dozen people.
“We are confident that such a boost will be highly effective against the Delta variant,” Pfizer research head Mikael Dolsten said last week.
But even in Israel, which has started giving third shots of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine to severely vulnerable people, officials are playing it cautiously. Ran Balicer, a top adviser to the health ministry, pointed out on July 12 that there is still no “clear evidence on waning immunity” and said “other potential explanations to some of the rising current cases” would need to be ruled out before deploying boosters more widely.
U.S. officials also want to see more evidence of the need for boosters before authorizing them, the New York Times reported on July 12.
“Based on the totality of the data they have to date, Pfizer and BioNTech believe that a third dose may be beneficial to maintain the highest levels of protection,” the companies said in a statement last week.
A Pfizer spokesperson added on July 13: “We are actively working with governments all around the world as well as global health partners to work towards fair and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines while also providing our expertise and resources for novel approaches that can help to strengthen health care systems where greater support may be needed.”