精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清,国产精品成人久久久久,国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍

首頁 500強(qiáng) 活動 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

史上最大爆倉:忘卻了前車之鑒的高盛

在2018年年底,高盛曾經(jīng)拒絕與比爾·黃開展業(yè)務(wù)。

文本設(shè)置
小號
默認(rèn)
大號
Plus(0條)

在高盛集團(tuán)(Goldman Sachs Group Inc.)看來,曾經(jīng)因?yàn)閮?nèi)部交易而認(rèn)罪的前對沖基金經(jīng)理比爾·黃(Bill Hwang)存在巨大的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。2018年年底,高盛曾經(jīng)拒絕與其開展業(yè)務(wù)。

然而,這些疑慮很快被拋之腦后。

像比爾這樣的大拿每年會向高盛的競爭對手交易商支付數(shù)千萬美元的傭金,受此誘惑,高盛這家華爾街知名投行將其移出了銀行的黑名單,并將其列為重要客戶。就像摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)、瑞士信貸集團(tuán)(Credit Suisse Group AG)和其他公司所做的那樣,高盛陸續(xù)提供了數(shù)十億美元的貸款,供比爾利用高杠桿來押注中國科技巨頭百度和媒體巨人維亞康姆哥倫比亞廣播公司(ViacomCBS Inc.)。

如今,比爾成為了歷史上最高額度保證金追繳事件的焦點(diǎn)人物,其巨大的資產(chǎn)組合陷入了混亂、痛苦的清算當(dāng)中,而且高盛態(tài)度的逆轉(zhuǎn)直接將其打入了地獄。

據(jù)兩位直接知情人士透露,比爾的Archegos資本管理公司(Archegos Capital Management)因?yàn)槭艿狡鋫鶛?quán)人的逼迫,在3月26日(周五)一系列引發(fā)市場震蕩的交易中拋售了200多億美元的股票。這在投資者看來,此次拋售的規(guī)模和速度可謂是前無來者。

高盛甚至在當(dāng)天晚間向客戶發(fā)送了電子郵件,告知他們高盛實(shí)際上也加入了拋售行列。這封郵件詳細(xì)列出了共計(jì)105億美元的交易,但并未透露比爾或Archegos的名字。彭博社(Bloomberg)看到了該郵件的一份副本。

高盛、摩根士丹利、瑞士信貸的代表拒絕置評。我們也無法聯(lián)系上比爾及其在Archegos的同事。

超高杠桿

作為一名在老虎基金(Tiger Mamagement)為朱利安·羅伯森效力的“虎仔”,比爾在關(guān)閉了自己的對沖基金后創(chuàng)建了Archegos家族理財(cái)室。熟悉其訂單的交易員稱,比爾采用超高的杠桿來運(yùn)營長、短線策略,這意味著他自己每拿出一美元,就會用高達(dá)數(shù)倍的借貸資金與之搭配。

多年來,隨著高盛親眼目睹Archegos將業(yè)務(wù)交給了其他投行,高盛股票部門的資深員工曾經(jīng)嘗試將比爾發(fā)展為自身客戶。然而,每當(dāng)股票部門嘗試為其開設(shè)賬戶時(shí),高盛合規(guī)部門就會叫停,參與上述討論的知情人士說到原因:比爾是個(gè)有前科的人。

2012年,比爾代表其公司老虎亞洲基金(Tiger Asia Management),向美國承認(rèn)了自己的電匯詐騙罪行。美國司法部(Justice Department)稱,老虎亞洲基金使用了重要非公開信息來開展交易,在2008和2009年謀取了1600萬美元的非法利潤。

2018年,高盛當(dāng)時(shí)在全力應(yīng)對馬來西亞1MDB投資基金貪瀆丑聞,并依然在嘗試于金融危機(jī)后重塑其品牌信譽(yù)。

東山再起

在過去兩年半中,高盛在某種程度上改變了對比爾的看法。我們?nèi)匀徊磺宄@一轉(zhuǎn)變背后的原因到底是什么。這里有一種可能性:高盛認(rèn)為,自比爾東窗事發(fā)后,已經(jīng)過去了十年,他已經(jīng)得到了足夠的懲罰。作為家族理財(cái)室,Archegos自身也發(fā)展成了一股不小的勢力,其規(guī)模超過了很多對沖基金。

而直接了解這一關(guān)系的人士稱,最終,高盛加入了比爾的頂級融資機(jī)構(gòu)陣容,讓他能夠押注眾多在上周以驚人速度爆倉的高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)賭注。

不過,被殃及的并非只有高盛一家。隨著這些賭注陷入混亂,比爾的首要經(jīng)紀(jì)商要求其為保證金貸款支付更多的擔(dān)保金。知情人士稱,在3月26日早上,一些投行開始行權(quán),稱其出現(xiàn)違約,并變現(xiàn)了他的頭寸以回籠自身資本。其他機(jī)構(gòu)迅速效仿。

此舉引發(fā)了股票的大規(guī)模瘋狂拋售,與此同時(shí),各大投行為了避損,爭先恐后地拋售價(jià)值即將暴跌的股票,留給華爾街的則是努力思考如何為這場交易之殤自圓其說。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:馮豐

審校:夏林

在高盛集團(tuán)(Goldman Sachs Group Inc.)看來,曾經(jīng)因?yàn)閮?nèi)部交易而認(rèn)罪的前對沖基金經(jīng)理比爾·黃(Bill Hwang)存在巨大的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。2018年年底,高盛曾經(jīng)拒絕與其開展業(yè)務(wù)。

然而,這些疑慮很快被拋之腦后。

像比爾這樣的大拿每年會向高盛的競爭對手交易商支付數(shù)千萬美元的傭金,受此誘惑,高盛這家華爾街知名投行將其移出了銀行的黑名單,并將其列為重要客戶。就像摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)、瑞士信貸集團(tuán)(Credit Suisse Group AG)和其他公司所做的那樣,高盛陸續(xù)提供了數(shù)十億美元的貸款,供比爾利用高杠桿來押注中國科技巨頭百度和媒體巨人維亞康姆哥倫比亞廣播公司(ViacomCBS Inc.)。

如今,比爾成為了歷史上最高額度保證金追繳事件的焦點(diǎn)人物,其巨大的資產(chǎn)組合陷入了混亂、痛苦的清算當(dāng)中,而且高盛態(tài)度的逆轉(zhuǎn)直接將其打入了地獄。

據(jù)兩位直接知情人士透露,比爾的Archegos資本管理公司(Archegos Capital Management)因?yàn)槭艿狡鋫鶛?quán)人的逼迫,在3月26日(周五)一系列引發(fā)市場震蕩的交易中拋售了200多億美元的股票。這在投資者看來,此次拋售的規(guī)模和速度可謂是前無來者。

高盛甚至在當(dāng)天晚間向客戶發(fā)送了電子郵件,告知他們高盛實(shí)際上也加入了拋售行列。這封郵件詳細(xì)列出了共計(jì)105億美元的交易,但并未透露比爾或Archegos的名字。彭博社(Bloomberg)看到了該郵件的一份副本。

高盛、摩根士丹利、瑞士信貸的代表拒絕置評。我們也無法聯(lián)系上比爾及其在Archegos的同事。

超高杠桿

作為一名在老虎基金(Tiger Mamagement)為朱利安·羅伯森效力的“虎仔”,比爾在關(guān)閉了自己的對沖基金后創(chuàng)建了Archegos家族理財(cái)室。熟悉其訂單的交易員稱,比爾采用超高的杠桿來運(yùn)營長、短線策略,這意味著他自己每拿出一美元,就會用高達(dá)數(shù)倍的借貸資金與之搭配。

多年來,隨著高盛親眼目睹Archegos將業(yè)務(wù)交給了其他投行,高盛股票部門的資深員工曾經(jīng)嘗試將比爾發(fā)展為自身客戶。然而,每當(dāng)股票部門嘗試為其開設(shè)賬戶時(shí),高盛合規(guī)部門就會叫停,參與上述討論的知情人士說到原因:比爾是個(gè)有前科的人。

2012年,比爾代表其公司老虎亞洲基金(Tiger Asia Management),向美國承認(rèn)了自己的電匯詐騙罪行。美國司法部(Justice Department)稱,老虎亞洲基金使用了重要非公開信息來開展交易,在2008和2009年謀取了1600萬美元的非法利潤。

2018年,高盛當(dāng)時(shí)在全力應(yīng)對馬來西亞1MDB投資基金貪瀆丑聞,并依然在嘗試于金融危機(jī)后重塑其品牌信譽(yù)。

東山再起

在過去兩年半中,高盛在某種程度上改變了對比爾的看法。我們?nèi)匀徊磺宄@一轉(zhuǎn)變背后的原因到底是什么。這里有一種可能性:高盛認(rèn)為,自比爾東窗事發(fā)后,已經(jīng)過去了十年,他已經(jīng)得到了足夠的懲罰。作為家族理財(cái)室,Archegos自身也發(fā)展成了一股不小的勢力,其規(guī)模超過了很多對沖基金。

而直接了解這一關(guān)系的人士稱,最終,高盛加入了比爾的頂級融資機(jī)構(gòu)陣容,讓他能夠押注眾多在上周以驚人速度爆倉的高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)賭注。

不過,被殃及的并非只有高盛一家。隨著這些賭注陷入混亂,比爾的首要經(jīng)紀(jì)商要求其為保證金貸款支付更多的擔(dān)保金。知情人士稱,在3月26日早上,一些投行開始行權(quán),稱其出現(xiàn)違約,并變現(xiàn)了他的頭寸以回籠自身資本。其他機(jī)構(gòu)迅速效仿。

此舉引發(fā)了股票的大規(guī)模瘋狂拋售,與此同時(shí),各大投行為了避損,爭先恐后地拋售價(jià)值即將暴跌的股票,留給華爾街的則是努力思考如何為這場交易之殤自圓其說。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:馮豐

審校:夏林

Bill Hwang, a former hedge fund manager who’d pleaded guilty to insider trading, was deemed such a risk by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. that as recently as late 2018 the firm refused to do business with him.

Those misgivings didn’t last.

Wall Street’s premier investment bank, lured by the tens of millions of dollars a year in commissions that a whale like Hwang paid to rival dealers, removed his name from its blacklist and allowed him to become a major client. Just as Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse Group AG and others did, Goldman fueled a pipeline of billions of dollars in credit for Hwang to make highly leveraged bets on stocks such as Chinese tech giant Baidu Inc. and media conglomerate ViacomCBS Inc.

Now Hwang is at the center of one of the greatest margin calls of all time, his giant portfolio in a messy and painful liquidation, and Goldman’s reversal has thrust it right into the mayhem.

According to two people with direct knowledge of the matter, Hwang’s Archegos Capital Management was forced by its lenders to dump more than $20 billion of stocks on March 26Friday in a series of market-roiling trades so large and hurried that investors described them as unprecedented.

Goldman even emailed clients late Friday to inform them that it had in fact been one of the banks selling. The email, a copy of which was seen by Bloomberg, detailed a total of $10.5 billion in trades. The message didn’t name Hwang or Archegos.

Representatives for Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse declined to comment. Efforts to reach Hwang and his associates at Archegos were unsuccessful.

Large Leverage

A so-called Tiger Cub who worked for Julian Robertson at Tiger Management, Hwang set up Archegos as a family office after shutting down his own hedge fund. Traders familiar with his orders describe Hwang running a long-short strategy with exceptionally large leverage, meaning that for every dollar of his own, he’d pile on several times as much in borrowed money.

For years, as they watched Archegos send business elsewhere, senior staff in Goldman’s equities division tried to cultivate Hwang as a client. Yet every attempt to open an account for him was blocked by Goldman’s compliance department, according to people familiar involved in those discussions. The reason: Hwang’s checkered past.

In 2012, he pleaded guilty on behalf of his firm, Tiger Asia Management, to U.S. charges of wire fraud. According to the Justice Department, Tiger Asia traded on material non-public information, reaping $16 million of illicit profits in 2008 and 2009.

Back in 2018, Goldman was wrestling with the reputation damage from the 1MDB scandal in Malaysia as well as still trying to restore its name after the financial crisis.

Force of its Own

At some point in the past two-and-a-half years, the firm changed its mind about Hwang. What exactly prompted the shift still isn’t clear. One possibility: The firm decided that, after a decade since his illegal trades, Hwang had spent enough time in the penalty box. Archegos had also become a force of its own, a family office that was bigger than many hedge funds.

Eventually, Goldman joined the ranks of Hwang’s top financiers, according to the people with direct knowledge of that relationship, enabling him to place many of the risky wagers that unraveled at breathtaking speed last week.

Goldman wasn’t alone. As those bets went haywire, Hwang’s prime brokers demanded more collateral to back his margin loans. By March 26 morning, some banks had started exercising the right to declare him in default and liquidate his positions to recover their capital, according to people familiar with that situation. Others swiftly followed.

That triggered a mad dash to sell shares in huge blocks as one bank after another scrambled to avoid losses on stocks that soon would be plummeting in value. As Monday’s open approaches, Wall Street is still trying to piece together a full accounting of the trades.

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開

            主站蜘蛛池模板: 合肥市| 唐河县| 阿克陶县| 星子县| 广饶县| 永吉县| 曲松县| 桦南县| 马山县| 仁怀市| 那坡县| 泗水县| 吴桥县| 莆田市| 巴林左旗| 长兴县| 钟山县| 应用必备| 乐陵市| 万荣县| 屏山县| 哈密市| 阳信县| 瑞丽市| 福清市| 清丰县| 浙江省| 宝清县| 祁东县| 石城县| 西充县| 清徐县| 宁武县| 南充市| 额济纳旗| 青河县| 孟村| 绥阳县| 淅川县| 洞头县| 西充县|