美國疫苗接種計劃若想取得成功,則必須保證每個人都能夠在三至四周間隔后順利接種第二劑疫苗。然而近期的一項研究表明,許多人可能無法進行二次注射,因而也無法滿足最大免疫條件。
該項研究發表于12月14日,主要調查了帶狀皰疹病毒疫苗的接種情況。研究發現,四分之一的醫療保險患者在第一次注射后的六個月內沒有得到第二次注射。
當然,受益于日漸增高的健康風險意識,新冠疫苗接種者的完整接種率顯然會高于其他疫苗。但研究人員依舊警告稱,疫苗接種工作可能會遭遇諸多障礙,既可能是接種者自身疏忽,也有可能是客觀的收入、年齡及生活狀況所致。
當前,美國的多個州已經進入完全失控狀態,大量不規范、不完整的疫苗接種可能反而會加劇控制新冠疫情的難度,還可能會導致更高的死亡率及住院率。
更糟糕的是,研究人員還發現帶狀皰疹后續疫苗接種率在特定人群中明顯要低很多,西班牙裔、非洲裔及亞裔接種者的接種率分別僅為58%、61%及69%。與此同時,只有64%的低收入接種者及66%的殘疾接種者會自主安排第二次注射。
“這顯然對疫苗接種工作有不利影響。”研究報告撰寫人之一、凱薩家庭基金會(Kaiser Family Foundation)負責醫療保險政策事宜的副主任朱麗葉·庫班斯基說:“這類群體又恰恰最受疫情影響之苦,無論重癥率還是死亡率都很高。”
相較于癥狀難熬但致死率極低的帶狀皰疹病毒,新冠病毒則要兇險很多。所幸后者每天都在新聞里反復出現,所以接種者不太容易會忘記進行二次接種。
要想保證二次接種率,美國需要做的是“搶時間”。目前美國已經投入使用兩種疫苗分別來自Moderna和輝瑞(Pfizer)及BioNTech公司,這兩種疫苗都要求接種者在接種第一劑后的三到四周內再打第二針。相較而言,帶狀皰疹病毒疫苗所需要的間隔周期有6周,時間更為充裕,而新冠疫苗的時間更為緊張。根據庫班斯基的說法,越是延后注射疫苗,接種者就越容易忽略后續注射。
此外,上文所提及的接種者收入、年齡及生活狀況等因素依然需要被納入考量。
原因之一是,在美國的醫療保健系統中,各類支出相當繁雜,不可預測、難以避免。庫班斯基說,Shingrix每劑疫苗的費用需要部分自擔,一些人因此不愿意再接種第二劑。相比之下,新冠病毒疫苗將無需美國民眾自付費用,即使是2900萬沒有醫療保險的美國民眾,也能夠免費接種。但庫班斯基擔心,一些人可能沒有意識到他們可以免費接種疫苗。
她說:“現在的癥結是,即使無需付出任何實際成本,一些人擔心需要為疫苗自掏腰包。他們可能沒有意識到疫苗其實是免費的。”
交通也可能成為問題。殘障人士、低收入者及農村地區的美國民眾難以抵達接種地點,去一次都很難,更遑論接種兩次了。就全美來說,農村地區的流感疫苗接種率最低,在某些情況下甚至低至25%,距離太遠是其中一大原因。
另外,庫班斯基擔心,一些新冠病毒疫苗接種者在第一次疫苗接種后產生不良反應,也會不愿意繼續接種第二劑。不良反應并不常見,但其實輝瑞和Moderna的疫苗都有可能引起輕微的肌肉酸痛、疲勞或低燒。
庫班斯基說:“這些副作用根本不是‘得病的跡象’,而是疫苗已經開始起作用的跡象。這一點需要明確。”
從醫學上講,輝瑞及Moderna的疫苗根本不可能傳播新冠病毒。雖然一些疫苗使用的是其針對病毒的弱化版本,但新冠疫苗使用了一種新技術,無需使用任何病毒物質就能夠觸發免疫。
除此之外,還有一個原因:美國沒有統一的系統來確保患者可以接種第二劑疫苗。所以如何落實?責任將落在每個個人接種者及提供接種服務的醫療機構身上。
據預計,門診診所將是主要的疫苗接種地點,沃爾格林(Walgreens)和CVS經營的診所就包含其中。沃爾格林表示,它們將用各種辦法,來確保后續接種的落實,例如在接種者第一次注射時就提前預約第二次注射,并通過信件、電子郵件和語音郵件等方式提醒接種者。
與新冠疫情的方方面面一樣,“錯失二次接種”的影響超出了個人層面。試驗數據表明,Moderna或輝瑞疫苗的單劑劑量能夠提供的顯著保護,但若接種第二劑,保護力度會大得多,持續的時間也可能會更長。如果大批民眾未能接種第二劑疫苗,可能需要更長的時間才可以達到阻止傳播和全球疫情所需的全民免疫水平。(財富中文網)
編譯:陳怡軒、楊二一
美國疫苗接種計劃若想取得成功,則必須保證每個人都能夠在三至四周間隔后順利接種第二劑疫苗。然而近期的一項研究表明,許多人可能無法進行二次注射,因而也無法滿足最大免疫條件。
該項研究發表于12月14日,主要調查了帶狀皰疹病毒疫苗的接種情況。研究發現,四分之一的醫療保險患者在第一次注射后的六個月內沒有得到第二次注射。
當然,受益于日漸增高的健康風險意識,新冠疫苗接種者的完整接種率顯然會高于其他疫苗。但研究人員依舊警告稱,疫苗接種工作可能會遭遇諸多障礙,既可能是接種者自身疏忽,也有可能是客觀的收入、年齡及生活狀況所致。
當前,美國的多個州已經進入完全失控狀態,大量不規范、不完整的疫苗接種可能反而會加劇控制新冠疫情的難度,還可能會導致更高的死亡率及住院率。
更糟糕的是,研究人員還發現帶狀皰疹后續疫苗接種率在特定人群中明顯要低很多,西班牙裔、非洲裔及亞裔接種者的接種率分別僅為58%、61%及69%。與此同時,只有64%的低收入接種者及66%的殘疾接種者會自主安排第二次注射。
“這顯然對疫苗接種工作有不利影響。”研究報告撰寫人之一、凱薩家庭基金會(Kaiser Family Foundation)負責醫療保險政策事宜的副主任朱麗葉·庫班斯基說:“這類群體又恰恰最受疫情影響之苦,無論重癥率還是死亡率都很高。”
相較于癥狀難熬但致死率極低的帶狀皰疹病毒,新冠病毒則要兇險很多。所幸后者每天都在新聞里反復出現,所以接種者不太容易會忘記進行二次接種。
要想保證二次接種率,美國需要做的是“搶時間”。目前美國已經投入使用兩種疫苗分別來自Moderna和輝瑞(Pfizer)及BioNTech公司,這兩種疫苗都要求接種者在接種第一劑后的三到四周內再打第二針。相較而言,帶狀皰疹病毒疫苗所需要的間隔周期有6周,時間更為充裕,而新冠疫苗的時間更為緊張。根據庫班斯基的說法,越是延后注射疫苗,接種者就越容易忽略后續注射。
此外,上文所提及的接種者收入、年齡及生活狀況等因素依然需要被納入考量。
原因之一是,在美國的醫療保健系統中,各類支出相當繁雜,不可預測、難以避免。庫班斯基說,Shingrix每劑疫苗的費用需要部分自擔,一些人因此不愿意再接種第二劑。相比之下,新冠病毒疫苗將無需美國民眾自付費用,即使是2900萬沒有醫療保險的美國民眾,也能夠免費接種。但庫班斯基擔心,一些人可能沒有意識到他們可以免費接種疫苗。
她說:“現在的癥結是,即使無需付出任何實際成本,一些人擔心需要為疫苗自掏腰包。他們可能沒有意識到疫苗其實是免費的。”
交通也可能成為問題。殘障人士、低收入者及農村地區的美國民眾難以抵達接種地點,去一次都很難,更遑論接種兩次了。就全美來說,農村地區的流感疫苗接種率最低,在某些情況下甚至低至25%,距離太遠是其中一大原因。
另外,庫班斯基擔心,一些新冠病毒疫苗接種者在第一次疫苗接種后產生不良反應,也會不愿意繼續接種第二劑。不良反應并不常見,但其實輝瑞和Moderna的疫苗都有可能引起輕微的肌肉酸痛、疲勞或低燒。
庫班斯基說:“這些副作用根本不是‘得病的跡象’,而是疫苗已經開始起作用的跡象。這一點需要明確。”
從醫學上講,輝瑞及Moderna的疫苗根本不可能傳播新冠病毒。雖然一些疫苗使用的是其針對病毒的弱化版本,但新冠疫苗使用了一種新技術,無需使用任何病毒物質就能夠觸發免疫。
除此之外,還有一個原因:美國沒有統一的系統來確保患者可以接種第二劑疫苗。所以如何落實?責任將落在每個個人接種者及提供接種服務的醫療機構身上。
據預計,門診診所將是主要的疫苗接種地點,沃爾格林(Walgreens)和CVS經營的診所就包含其中。沃爾格林表示,它們將用各種辦法,來確保后續接種的落實,例如在接種者第一次注射時就提前預約第二次注射,并通過信件、電子郵件和語音郵件等方式提醒接種者。
與新冠疫情的方方面面一樣,“錯失二次接種”的影響超出了個人層面。試驗數據表明,Moderna或輝瑞疫苗的單劑劑量能夠提供的顯著保護,但若接種第二劑,保護力度會大得多,持續的時間也可能會更長。如果大批民眾未能接種第二劑疫苗,可能需要更長的時間才可以達到阻止傳播和全球疫情所需的全民免疫水平。(財富中文網)
編譯:陳怡軒、楊二一
Success for the huge COVID-19 U.S. vaccination program now underway hinges on people getting two doses, separated by three to four weeks. But a recent study suggests that many people may fail to get their second injection, which is necessary to build maximum immunity.
The research, published Dec. 14, focused on a vaccine to prevent the viral skin condition known as shingles. It found that one in four Medicare patients missed getting their second dose within six months of their initial one.
Recipients of the two COVID-19 vaccines currently approved for use may be more likely to complete their immunizations than those in the study, for reasons including greater perceived health risk if they don't. But the authors of the new study caution that many of the same barriers will be at work: not just patient negligence, but also poverty, age, and isolation.
A high number of incomplete vaccinations could make it harder to stem the coronavirus and end the pandemic, which is spreading out of control in most states. It could also lead to more deaths and hospitalizations than there otherwise would be.
To make matters worse, the study found that follow-up vaccination rates for the shingles were much lower for certain groups. Only 58% of Hispanic patients, 61% of Black patients, and 69% of Asian patients received a second dose. Meanwhile, only 64% of low-income patients and 66% of disabled patients returned for their second doses.
“This obviously has some troubling implications for the COVID vaccine,” says Juliette Cubanski, one of the study’s authors and deputy director for Medicare policy at KFF, formerly the Kaiser Family Foundation. “These groups are among the hardest hit in terms of getting seriously ill and dying from COVID.”
There are important differences between Shingrix, the shingles vaccine, and the coronavirus vaccines. Most obviously, while shingles can be extremely painful and even debilitating, it is rarely life-threatening. And with the coronavirus in the news every single day, there will be fewer chances for patients to simply forget their second dose.
Another factor that points to higher second-dose rates for the COVID vaccines is timing. Patients could wait up to six months for their second dose of Shingrix, but both COVID vaccines currently being administered—one from Moderna and another from Pfizer-BioNTech—require a second shot within three to four weeks. According to Cubanski, the longer Shingrix delay may have made it easier for patients to overlook their follow-up shot.
But other factors that prevented patients from getting their full course of Shingrix will still be in effect when it comes to the COVID vaccines.
One is the complex and often unpredictable payments that are inextricable from American health care. The Shingrix vaccine required an out-of-pocket copayment for each dose, which Cubanski says may have discouraged some people from getting a second one. By contrast, the coronavirus vaccine is expected to require no payment from U.S. recipients, even for the 29 million Americans without health insurance. But Cubanski worries that people may not realize that they can get immunized at no cost.
“People’s concern about having to pay something out of pocket might be an issue, even if there is no actual cost," she says. "They might not be aware that the vaccine is actually free.”
Transportation will also likely be an issue. Disabled, low-income, or rural Americans in particular may have difficulty reaching a vaccination site not just once, but twice. Rural areas have some of America’s lowest influenza vaccination rates—as low as 25% in some cases—partly because of distance.
Finally, Cubanski is concerned that some coronavirus vaccine recipients will be discouraged from following through on their second dose after an adverse reaction to the first one. Though the reactions don’t appear to be common, both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can cause mild muscle soreness, fatigue, or low fever.
“These side effects are a sign that the vaccine is working, and not a sign that you have been infected with the virus and now have the disease,” says Cubanski. “That’s an important message to get across.”
In fact, it is medically impossible for the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines to transmit the virus behind COVID-19. While some vaccines use weakened versions of the virus they protect against, the new COVID vaccines use a new technique to trigger immunity without using any viral material.
Meanwhile, there is no single system in the U.S. to ensure that patients get their second dose. That responsibility will fall on individual recipients and the various health providers administering the vaccine.
One major vaccination site is expected to be outpatient clinics, including those run by Walgreens and CVS. Walgreens says it will use a variety of techniques to ensure follow-up doses, including scheduling an appointment for a second dose when the first one is administered, and sending patients reminders via mail, email, and voicemail.
As with most aspects of the coronavirus pandemic, these challenges have implications beyond the individual who misses his or her second dose. Trial data indicates that a single dose of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines provide significant protection from the coronavirus, but a second dose makes that protection much higher and likely longer-lasting. If enough people miss their second vaccine doses, it could take significantly longer to reach the population-wide immunity level needed to stop the virus from circulating and end the pandemic.