精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清,国产精品成人久久久久,国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍

首頁 500強 活動 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

拜登若免除大部分學(xué)生貸款,對美國經(jīng)濟(jì)是喜是憂?

Aric Jenkins
2020-12-03

專家指出,免除學(xué)生貸款債務(wù)將給數(shù)千萬美國人帶來經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激,并有助于縮小種族貧富差距。

文本設(shè)置
小號
默認(rèn)
大號
Plus(0條)

美國參議院少數(shù)黨領(lǐng)袖查克?舒默在11月早些時候表示,他希望當(dāng)選總統(tǒng)喬?拜登的政府能夠免除大多數(shù)美國人5萬美元的聯(lián)邦學(xué)生貸款,此番言論引起了轟動。放在幾年前,美國人幾乎無法想象這種想法可以得到舒默這樣的溫和派重要人士的支持,但最令人驚訝的是,這位參議員主張拜登在擔(dān)任總統(tǒng)的頭100天內(nèi),通過行政命令來實行這一舉措。

美國目前的聯(lián)邦學(xué)生貸款超過1.7萬億美元,拜登必須能力過硬才能夠?qū)嵤┤绱舜笠?guī)模的刺激計劃,將其一筆勾銷,因為共和黨所控制的參議院幾乎肯定不會在國會通過這項法案。民主黨如果可以在佐治亞州接下來的第二輪選舉中把兩個參議員席位都拿下,就有機(jī)會在參議院中占據(jù)大半江山,但這種情況遠(yuǎn)非十拿九穩(wěn)。如果他們未能成功的話,拜登將不得不依靠行政命令來推行大多數(shù)政策。

今年9月,舒默和另一位參議員伊麗莎白?沃倫提出一項決議,聲稱根據(jù)美國在1965年頒布的《高等教育法》(Higher Education Act),總統(tǒng)擁有免除學(xué)生貸款債務(wù)的行政權(quán)力。該法案其中有一條規(guī)定,總統(tǒng)任命的教育部部長能夠“減少、放棄或免除任何權(quán)利、頭銜、所有權(quán)、留置權(quán)或要求”,兩位參議員認(rèn)為這其中包括了學(xué)生貸款債務(wù)。一些法律學(xué)者認(rèn)為,這一條款可以讓其在法庭上經(jīng)受得住質(zhì)疑,尤其是在不清楚誰會真正提起訴訟的情況下。無論誰想這么做,都必須闡明不收回這筆債務(wù)所帶來的危害,而很少人能夠證明這一點。

沃倫11月在《華盛頓郵報》(Washington Post)發(fā)表了一篇專欄文章,她指出免除學(xué)生貸款債務(wù)將給數(shù)千萬美國人帶來經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激,并有助于縮小種族貧富差距,此舉也將因此成為“唯一最有效的行政措施來提供大規(guī)模消費驅(qū)動刺激”。

在今年早些時候進(jìn)行的競選宣傳中,拜登認(rèn)可減免1萬美元的學(xué)生貸款,但他尚未公開支持舒默和沃倫提議的免除5萬美元計劃。當(dāng)最近被問及此事時,拜登拒絕發(fā)表評論,反而提到了眾議院通過的“衛(wèi)生和經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇綜合緊急解決方案法案”(HEROES Act Bill),這是美國應(yīng)對新冠疫情的第二項刺激計劃,但因為參議院的民主黨和共和黨無法達(dá)成協(xié)議,所以計劃目前被擱置。

不過,像舒默這樣堅定的溫和派如今提出這一計劃,拜登或許也越來越有可能考慮實施行政命令。如果他這么做的話,美國是否真的會像沃倫堅稱的那樣,迎來經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮并減少種族貧富差距?

美國巴德學(xué)院的一批經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)教授曾經(jīng)在2018年發(fā)表一篇名為《免除學(xué)生債務(wù)的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)》(The Macroeconomic Effects of Student Debt Cancellation)的論文,其中便提到了這一主題。研究人員在模擬實驗中實施了一次性全額免除學(xué)生貸款的政策,取消了包括聯(lián)邦和私人貸款在內(nèi)的債務(wù),從而發(fā)現(xiàn)了以下宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng):

國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值平均每年增加860億至1080億美元

在10年預(yù)測期內(nèi),平均失業(yè)率下降0.22至0.36個百分點

免除學(xué)生債務(wù)的頭幾年里,每年大約新增120萬到150萬個工作崗位

美國聯(lián)邦儲備委員會小幅上調(diào)利率

“研究表明,其他許多積極的溢出效應(yīng)在這些模擬中并沒有被考慮在內(nèi)。”作者補充道,“這包括成立小型企業(yè)、獲取學(xué)歷、成立家庭、提高獲得信貸的機(jī)會,以及減少家庭受經(jīng)濟(jì)周期性低迷的影響。”

然而,這些發(fā)現(xiàn)中有幾點需要留意。這項特別的模擬免除了全部的債務(wù),而不是每個借款人只減免5萬美元(不過需要指出,大約四分之三美國人的學(xué)生債務(wù)少于5萬美元),而且它假定聯(lián)邦政府接管私人貸款的融資,而舒默和沃倫的計劃僅限于聯(lián)邦債務(wù)。不過研究人員也表示:“我們的結(jié)果保守估計了免除學(xué)生債務(wù)所帶來的宏觀影響”,因此可能已經(jīng)有一些平衡因素在內(nèi)。

當(dāng)涉及到種族貧富差距時,研究表明即使沒有巴德學(xué)院模擬的那種一次性全免政策,免除學(xué)生債務(wù)也是可以帶來好處的。2015年,一家名為Demos的左傾智庫曾經(jīng)做過一項研究并發(fā)現(xiàn),免除所有家庭的學(xué)生債務(wù)實際上會讓種族貧富差距的中值增加9%,因為白人家庭完成大學(xué)和研究生學(xué)位的可能性更高。

相反,Demos建議只在年收入低于5萬美元的低收入家庭中免除學(xué)生貸款。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)這一政策能夠讓低收入家庭中黑人和白人的貧富差距縮減37%。如果進(jìn)一步消除年收入在2.5萬美元或以下的家庭的債務(wù),黑人和白人的貧富差距將會縮小50%。

對于全面免除債務(wù)的政策來說,學(xué)生貸款人之間的收入差距一向是主要批評點。從本質(zhì)上來說,擁有最多債務(wù)的人最后往往會完成大學(xué)或研究生課程,進(jìn)而獲得更高的收入。批評者認(rèn)為,這些借款人不太需要債務(wù)減免,這可能會加劇上述貧富差距。如果拜登試圖推行免除學(xué)生債務(wù),他將面臨很多選擇。在限定收入的基礎(chǔ)上減免債務(wù),這一中立的折衷做法或許可以確保讓那些最需要債務(wù)減免的人受益。(財富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:秦維奇

美國參議院少數(shù)黨領(lǐng)袖查克?舒默在11月早些時候表示,他希望當(dāng)選總統(tǒng)喬?拜登的政府能夠免除大多數(shù)美國人5萬美元的聯(lián)邦學(xué)生貸款,此番言論引起了轟動。放在幾年前,美國人幾乎無法想象這種想法可以得到舒默這樣的溫和派重要人士的支持,但最令人驚訝的是,這位參議員主張拜登在擔(dān)任總統(tǒng)的頭100天內(nèi),通過行政命令來實行這一舉措。

美國目前的聯(lián)邦學(xué)生貸款超過1.7萬億美元,拜登必須能力過硬才能夠?qū)嵤┤绱舜笠?guī)模的刺激計劃,將其一筆勾銷,因為共和黨所控制的參議院幾乎肯定不會在國會通過這項法案。民主黨如果可以在佐治亞州接下來的第二輪選舉中把兩個參議員席位都拿下,就有機(jī)會在參議院中占據(jù)大半江山,但這種情況遠(yuǎn)非十拿九穩(wěn)。如果他們未能成功的話,拜登將不得不依靠行政命令來推行大多數(shù)政策。

今年9月,舒默和另一位參議員伊麗莎白?沃倫提出一項決議,聲稱根據(jù)美國在1965年頒布的《高等教育法》(Higher Education Act),總統(tǒng)擁有免除學(xué)生貸款債務(wù)的行政權(quán)力。該法案其中有一條規(guī)定,總統(tǒng)任命的教育部部長能夠“減少、放棄或免除任何權(quán)利、頭銜、所有權(quán)、留置權(quán)或要求”,兩位參議員認(rèn)為這其中包括了學(xué)生貸款債務(wù)。一些法律學(xué)者認(rèn)為,這一條款可以讓其在法庭上經(jīng)受得住質(zhì)疑,尤其是在不清楚誰會真正提起訴訟的情況下。無論誰想這么做,都必須闡明不收回這筆債務(wù)所帶來的危害,而很少人能夠證明這一點。

沃倫11月在《華盛頓郵報》(Washington Post)發(fā)表了一篇專欄文章,她指出免除學(xué)生貸款債務(wù)將給數(shù)千萬美國人帶來經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激,并有助于縮小種族貧富差距,此舉也將因此成為“唯一最有效的行政措施來提供大規(guī)模消費驅(qū)動刺激”。

在今年早些時候進(jìn)行的競選宣傳中,拜登認(rèn)可減免1萬美元的學(xué)生貸款,但他尚未公開支持舒默和沃倫提議的免除5萬美元計劃。當(dāng)最近被問及此事時,拜登拒絕發(fā)表評論,反而提到了眾議院通過的“衛(wèi)生和經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇綜合緊急解決方案法案”(HEROES Act Bill),這是美國應(yīng)對新冠疫情的第二項刺激計劃,但因為參議院的民主黨和共和黨無法達(dá)成協(xié)議,所以計劃目前被擱置。

不過,像舒默這樣堅定的溫和派如今提出這一計劃,拜登或許也越來越有可能考慮實施行政命令。如果他這么做的話,美國是否真的會像沃倫堅稱的那樣,迎來經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮并減少種族貧富差距?

美國巴德學(xué)院的一批經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)教授曾經(jīng)在2018年發(fā)表一篇名為《免除學(xué)生債務(wù)的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)》(The Macroeconomic Effects of Student Debt Cancellation)的論文,其中便提到了這一主題。研究人員在模擬實驗中實施了一次性全額免除學(xué)生貸款的政策,取消了包括聯(lián)邦和私人貸款在內(nèi)的債務(wù),從而發(fā)現(xiàn)了以下宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng):

國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值平均每年增加860億至1080億美元

在10年預(yù)測期內(nèi),平均失業(yè)率下降0.22至0.36個百分點

免除學(xué)生債務(wù)的頭幾年里,每年大約新增120萬到150萬個工作崗位

美國聯(lián)邦儲備委員會小幅上調(diào)利率

“研究表明,其他許多積極的溢出效應(yīng)在這些模擬中并沒有被考慮在內(nèi)。”作者補充道,“這包括成立小型企業(yè)、獲取學(xué)歷、成立家庭、提高獲得信貸的機(jī)會,以及減少家庭受經(jīng)濟(jì)周期性低迷的影響。”

然而,這些發(fā)現(xiàn)中有幾點需要留意。這項特別的模擬免除了全部的債務(wù),而不是每個借款人只減免5萬美元(不過需要指出,大約四分之三美國人的學(xué)生債務(wù)少于5萬美元),而且它假定聯(lián)邦政府接管私人貸款的融資,而舒默和沃倫的計劃僅限于聯(lián)邦債務(wù)。不過研究人員也表示:“我們的結(jié)果保守估計了免除學(xué)生債務(wù)所帶來的宏觀影響”,因此可能已經(jīng)有一些平衡因素在內(nèi)。

當(dāng)涉及到種族貧富差距時,研究表明即使沒有巴德學(xué)院模擬的那種一次性全免政策,免除學(xué)生債務(wù)也是可以帶來好處的。2015年,一家名為Demos的左傾智庫曾經(jīng)做過一項研究并發(fā)現(xiàn),免除所有家庭的學(xué)生債務(wù)實際上會讓種族貧富差距的中值增加9%,因為白人家庭完成大學(xué)和研究生學(xué)位的可能性更高。

相反,Demos建議只在年收入低于5萬美元的低收入家庭中免除學(xué)生貸款。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)這一政策能夠讓低收入家庭中黑人和白人的貧富差距縮減37%。如果進(jìn)一步消除年收入在2.5萬美元或以下的家庭的債務(wù),黑人和白人的貧富差距將會縮小50%。

對于全面免除債務(wù)的政策來說,學(xué)生貸款人之間的收入差距一向是主要批評點。從本質(zhì)上來說,擁有最多債務(wù)的人最后往往會完成大學(xué)或研究生課程,進(jìn)而獲得更高的收入。批評者認(rèn)為,這些借款人不太需要債務(wù)減免,這可能會加劇上述貧富差距。如果拜登試圖推行免除學(xué)生債務(wù),他將面臨很多選擇。在限定收入的基礎(chǔ)上減免債務(wù),這一中立的折衷做法或許可以確保讓那些最需要債務(wù)減免的人受益。(財富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:秦維奇

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer caused a stir earlier November when he stated his hope for President-elect Joe Biden's administration to forgive $50,000 of federal student loan debt for the majority of Americans. Such an idea endorsed by a major moderate party member like Schumer was practically unthinkable just a few years ago, but the most surprising element was the senator's assertion that it could be done by executive order within the first 100 days of Biden's presidency.

The ability to institute such a sweeping stimulus—there is currently more than $1.7 trillion in federal student debt—with the flick of Biden's pen is huge, because a Republican-controlled Senate would almost certainly not pass it as legislation through Congress. Democrats have a chance to win the majority if they capture both seats in Georgia's upcoming runoff elections, but that's far from guaranteed. If they don't succeed, Biden will have to rely on executive action to carry out most of his governance.

In September, Schumer and Sen. Elizabeth Warren unveiled a resolution arguing that the president has existing executive authority to cancel student loan debt thanks to the Higher Education Act of 1965. A passage in the legislation states that the president-appointed Secretary of Education can "compromise, waive, or release any right, title, claim, lien, or demand," which, the senators say, includes student loan debt. Some legal scholars say utilizing this provision could survive a challenge in the courts, especially because it's unclear who would actually bring a case to sue. Whoever did would have to demonstrate harm from not collecting this debt, and few could make that argument.

In an op-ed published in the Washington Post at November, Warren wrote that canceling student loan debt would give tens of millions of Americans an economic boost and help narrow the racial wealth gap, making it "the single most effective executive action available to provide massive consumer-driver stimulus."

Biden endorsed $10,000 in student loan forgiveness while on the campaign trail earlier this year, but has not offered any public support of Schumer and Warren's $50,000 plan. When asked about it recently, he declined to comment and instead pointed to the House-passed HEROES Act Bill, the second coronavirus stimulus package that currently lies dead in the water due to Republicans and Democrats in the Senate unable to compromise on a deal.

But the fact that a staunch moderate like Schumer is now in support of such a plan suggests a growing possibility that Biden would consider the executive order. If he did, would the economy really flourish, reducing the racial wealth gap, as Warren insists?

That was the subject of a 2018 paper "The Macroeconomic Effects of Student Debt Cancellation," authored by a group of economics professors working with Bard College. In a simulation using a one-time total student loan cancellation policy including federal and private loans, the researchers found the macroeconomic effects included:

an average GDP boost of $86 billion to $108 billion per year

a reduction of the average unemployment rate by 0.22 to 0.36 percentage points over a 10-year forecast

roughly 1.2 million to 1.5 million newly-created jobs per year in the first few years following student debt elimination

modest rises in the Federal Reserve's interest rates

"Research suggests many other positive spillover effects that are not accounted for in these simulations," the authors added, "including increases in small business formation, degree attainment, and household formation, as well as improved access to credit and reduced household vulnerability to business cycle downturns."

There are a couple of caveats to these findings, though. This particular simulation forgave all total debt rather than just $50,000 per borrower (though it's worth noting around three in four Americans have less than $50,000 in student debt), and it assumed that the federal government took over the financing of privately-owned loans on the behalf of borrowers, while Schumer and Warren's plan is just limited to federal debt. But the researchers noted that "our results provide a conservative estimate of the macro effects of student debt liberation," so there may be some semblance of balance there.

When it comes to the racial wealth gap, research suggests that eliminating student debt can be beneficial even if not done with a full-scale one-time policy like the Bard simulation. A 2015 study conducted by the left-leaning Demos think tank found that eliminating student debt for all households would actually increase the median racial wealth gap by 9% because white families have a higher likelihood of completing college and graduate degree programs at a higher percent.

Instead, Demos proposed eliminating student debt only among low-wealth households making less than $50,000 a year. Demos found that such a policy would reduce Black-white wealth disparity by nearly 37% among low-wealth households. And taking it a step further by eliminating debt for households making $25,000 or less would reduce the Black-white wealth gap by a staggering 50%.

This income disparity among student-loan borrowers has been one of the main criticisms of a sweeping debt cancellation policy. Essentially, people who have the most debt tend to complete college or graduate programs and go on to earn higher income as a result. Critics argue that those borrowers are in lesser need of debt forgiveness, which could add to the wealth gaps outlined above. Should Biden attempt to push forward with student debt cancellation, he will have a number of choices available to him. Limited forgiveness with a cap on income could present a middle-ground compromise that ensures those who need debt cancellation the most will benefit.

財富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為財富媒體知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財富Plus APP

前往打開

            主站蜘蛛池模板: 富顺县| 招远市| 唐山市| 海南省| 新化县| 西贡区| 桂东县| 芦山县| 宽城| 龙岩市| 奎屯市| 陆河县| 明星| 嘉义县| 九江市| 奈曼旗| 星子县| 仪征市| 合肥市| 长沙市| 龙海市| 银川市| 盐源县| 措勤县| 阿克陶县| 白河县| 怀柔区| 出国| 安塞县| 潞城市| 五河县| 宜都市| 大竹县| 西平县| 安陆市| 漳平市| 洛南县| 万年县| 津南区| 富锦市| 高雄市|