8月7日發(fā)布的7月最新就業(yè)報(bào)告數(shù)字顯示,受新冠疫情影響,餐飲業(yè)依然是就業(yè)受影響最嚴(yán)重的領(lǐng)域。
在疫情期間消失的崗位中,有四分之一來自于餐館和酒吧,全美總失業(yè)率達(dá)到了10.2%,而國(guó)會(huì)則依然在為第二個(gè)刺激方案以及已過期的600美元失業(yè)補(bǔ)助金的替代辦法而爭(zhēng)論不休。美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局的就業(yè)報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),7月美國(guó)失業(yè)總?cè)藬?shù)達(dá)到了1630萬,較4月的2310萬有所改善,原因在于一些州至少已經(jīng)部分重啟其經(jīng)濟(jì)。
然而,獨(dú)立餐館聯(lián)盟(Independent Restaurant Coalition)稱,盡管獨(dú)立餐館的工作崗位流失量在各大首要行業(yè)中居于首位,但它僅收到了約8.1%的“薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃”資金。這家由全美多位大廚和餐館老板領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的民間組織警告稱,如果政府不采取直接行動(dòng),1100萬獨(dú)立餐館的雇員將永遠(yuǎn)失去工作。
獨(dú)立餐館聯(lián)盟在7日發(fā)布的一則聲明中說:“7月的就業(yè)報(bào)告顯示,薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃對(duì)餐館來說是無效的,另一個(gè)貸款計(jì)劃也不會(huì)有什么效果。薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃試圖用一個(gè)為期八周的解決方案來解決長(zhǎng)達(dá)18個(gè)月的問題,而且我們需要國(guó)會(huì)立即提供額外的援助,以確保該行業(yè)在明年還能保留人們可以回歸的工作崗位。餐館的負(fù)債水平已然超過了以往任何時(shí)期,它們得償還薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃貸款,支付供應(yīng)商或雇員費(fèi)用。有三分之一預(yù)計(jì)將在今年年底徹底關(guān)門大吉。在可以安全重新營(yíng)業(yè)之后,我們需要政府撥款來幫助抵消相關(guān)成本。”
大多數(shù)州提供持續(xù)長(zhǎng)達(dá)26周的失業(yè)福利,而且事實(shí)證明,自3月以來,聯(lián)邦政府下發(fā)的每周額外600美元的資金對(duì)于數(shù)千萬失業(yè)美國(guó)民眾繼續(xù)支付其賬單至關(guān)重要。然而,聯(lián)邦失業(yè)救助金在7月底已經(jīng)到期,但說到在短時(shí)間內(nèi)拿出新的失業(yè)福利方案,國(guó)會(huì)在這一方面沒有任何進(jìn)展。盡管一些州已經(jīng)開始另行提供長(zhǎng)達(dá)20周的額外失業(yè)救助金,但隨著疫情的持續(xù)以及眾多企業(yè)依然處于關(guān)停狀態(tài),如果沒有額外的失業(yè)救助金,數(shù)千萬美國(guó)民眾將存在租金、按揭貸款和其他賬單的違約風(fēng)險(xiǎn),甚至連維持家人的日常餐飲都會(huì)出現(xiàn)困難。
餐館和酒吧,尤其是與其他零售企業(yè)相比,在重新開業(yè)方面遇到了不少困難,其中包括努力遵守不斷變化的室外座椅擺放法規(guī),以及讓老顧客遵守社交隔離、盡可能地戴口罩等等。這一舉措對(duì)于眾多企業(yè)來說非常難以接受,以至于它們寧愿再次關(guān)閉,而不是甘冒讓其雇員身心進(jìn)一步受到傷害的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
即便對(duì)于那些可以重新開業(yè)的餐館,美國(guó)很多州依然禁止在室內(nèi)提供服務(wù),以抑制新冠病毒的傳播,而那些可以在室外營(yíng)業(yè)的餐館通常不得不應(yīng)對(duì)多變的夏日天氣,例如熱浪、突如其來的陣雨。室外餐飲亦遇到了時(shí)限的問題,因?yàn)槁愤吅屯\噲?chǎng)額外的座位擺放區(qū)域?qū)⒂?月和10月到期,眾多城市預(yù)計(jì)車流量會(huì)在夏季結(jié)束后再次增加。即便對(duì)于那些已經(jīng)支撐如此長(zhǎng)時(shí)間、且有財(cái)力安裝室外加熱燈(先不說耗能的事)的餐館來說,冬天依然會(huì)來臨,而且室外就餐在很多地區(qū)是完全行不通的,因此也就只能提供外賣或者送餐服務(wù)。
盡管過去幾年人們對(duì)餐飲行業(yè)的關(guān)注度有所增加,尤其是在#MeToo運(yùn)動(dòng)之后對(duì)待女性雇員的態(tài)度方面更是如此,但疫情已經(jīng)進(jìn)一步暴露了根深蒂固的女性和種族歧視問題,也促使該行業(yè)的一些領(lǐng)袖疾呼,餐飲業(yè)應(yīng)該在可以完全重啟之后對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的業(yè)務(wù)實(shí)踐進(jìn)行大刀闊斧的調(diào)整。
8月6日,包括湯姆·克里奇歐、大衛(wèi)·張和丹尼·梅耶在內(nèi)的50名餐館所有者,公開發(fā)布了“兼顧安全與公正的重新開業(yè)計(jì)劃”。該計(jì)劃的聯(lián)合制定方還包括由餐館員工支持者領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的非營(yíng)利性組織 One Fair Wage,該計(jì)劃的宗旨在于消除餐館按低于最低薪資標(biāo)準(zhǔn)支付收小費(fèi)員工工資的現(xiàn)象。
這個(gè)涵蓋四點(diǎn)的計(jì)劃呼吁消除按低于最低薪資標(biāo)準(zhǔn)支付收小費(fèi)員工工資的現(xiàn)象,允許與后勤與廚房員工共享小費(fèi)(在很多地區(qū)是合法的,紐約除外,不過紐約在1月允許其他行業(yè)采取這種做法),薪資稅收減免,以及允許餐館征收5%的重新開業(yè)安全附加費(fèi)。
附加費(fèi)以及小費(fèi)共享對(duì)于舉步維艱的餐館來說至關(guān)重要,因?yàn)榇伺e可以幫助它們重回正軌,并支付全額的最低薪資,而不是通過小費(fèi)來湊數(shù)。很多批評(píng)人士將小費(fèi)作為薪資的做法稱為可能會(huì)助長(zhǎng)性騷擾的內(nèi)部種族歧視。One Fair Wage總裁薩魯·加雅拉曼對(duì)《食客》(Eater)雜志說,那些正逐步取消以小費(fèi)充當(dāng)最低薪資(不會(huì)立刻消失,而是在未來五年之內(nèi))的餐館將需要更多的立法支持,這也是為什么該計(jì)劃同時(shí)還提出了小費(fèi)共享以及征收附加費(fèi)的原因。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
8月7日發(fā)布的7月最新就業(yè)報(bào)告數(shù)字顯示,受新冠疫情影響,餐飲業(yè)依然是就業(yè)受影響最嚴(yán)重的領(lǐng)域。
在疫情期間消失的崗位中,有四分之一來自于餐館和酒吧,全美總失業(yè)率達(dá)到了10.2%,而國(guó)會(huì)則依然在為第二個(gè)刺激方案以及已過期的600美元失業(yè)補(bǔ)助金的替代辦法而爭(zhēng)論不休。美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局的就業(yè)報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),7月美國(guó)失業(yè)總?cè)藬?shù)達(dá)到了1630萬,較4月的2310萬有所改善,原因在于一些州至少已經(jīng)部分重啟其經(jīng)濟(jì)。
然而,獨(dú)立餐館聯(lián)盟(Independent Restaurant Coalition)稱,盡管獨(dú)立餐館的工作崗位流失量在各大首要行業(yè)中居于首位,但它僅收到了約8.1%的“薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃”資金。這家由全美多位大廚和餐館老板領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的民間組織警告稱,如果政府不采取直接行動(dòng),1100萬獨(dú)立餐館的雇員將永遠(yuǎn)失去工作。
獨(dú)立餐館聯(lián)盟在7日發(fā)布的一則聲明中說:“7月的就業(yè)報(bào)告顯示,薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃對(duì)餐館來說是無效的,另一個(gè)貸款計(jì)劃也不會(huì)有什么效果。薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃試圖用一個(gè)為期八周的解決方案來解決長(zhǎng)達(dá)18個(gè)月的問題,而且我們需要國(guó)會(huì)立即提供額外的援助,以確保該行業(yè)在明年還能保留人們可以回歸的工作崗位。餐館的負(fù)債水平已然超過了以往任何時(shí)期,它們得償還薪酬保護(hù)計(jì)劃貸款,支付供應(yīng)商或雇員費(fèi)用。有三分之一預(yù)計(jì)將在今年年底徹底關(guān)門大吉。在可以安全重新營(yíng)業(yè)之后,我們需要政府撥款來幫助抵消相關(guān)成本。”
大多數(shù)州提供持續(xù)長(zhǎng)達(dá)26周的失業(yè)福利,而且事實(shí)證明,自3月以來,聯(lián)邦政府下發(fā)的每周額外600美元的資金對(duì)于數(shù)千萬失業(yè)美國(guó)民眾繼續(xù)支付其賬單至關(guān)重要。然而,聯(lián)邦失業(yè)救助金在7月底已經(jīng)到期,但說到在短時(shí)間內(nèi)拿出新的失業(yè)福利方案,國(guó)會(huì)在這一方面沒有任何進(jìn)展。盡管一些州已經(jīng)開始另行提供長(zhǎng)達(dá)20周的額外失業(yè)救助金,但隨著疫情的持續(xù)以及眾多企業(yè)依然處于關(guān)停狀態(tài),如果沒有額外的失業(yè)救助金,數(shù)千萬美國(guó)民眾將存在租金、按揭貸款和其他賬單的違約風(fēng)險(xiǎn),甚至連維持家人的日常餐飲都會(huì)出現(xiàn)困難。
餐館和酒吧,尤其是與其他零售企業(yè)相比,在重新開業(yè)方面遇到了不少困難,其中包括努力遵守不斷變化的室外座椅擺放法規(guī),以及讓老顧客遵守社交隔離、盡可能地戴口罩等等。這一舉措對(duì)于眾多企業(yè)來說非常難以接受,以至于它們寧愿再次關(guān)閉,而不是甘冒讓其雇員身心進(jìn)一步受到傷害的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
即便對(duì)于那些可以重新開業(yè)的餐館,美國(guó)很多州依然禁止在室內(nèi)提供服務(wù),以抑制新冠病毒的傳播,而那些可以在室外營(yíng)業(yè)的餐館通常不得不應(yīng)對(duì)多變的夏日天氣,例如熱浪、突如其來的陣雨。室外餐飲亦遇到了時(shí)限的問題,因?yàn)槁愤吅屯\噲?chǎng)額外的座位擺放區(qū)域?qū)⒂?月和10月到期,眾多城市預(yù)計(jì)車流量會(huì)在夏季結(jié)束后再次增加。即便對(duì)于那些已經(jīng)支撐如此長(zhǎng)時(shí)間、且有財(cái)力安裝室外加熱燈(先不說耗能的事)的餐館來說,冬天依然會(huì)來臨,而且室外就餐在很多地區(qū)是完全行不通的,因此也就只能提供外賣或者送餐服務(wù)。
盡管過去幾年人們對(duì)餐飲行業(yè)的關(guān)注度有所增加,尤其是在#MeToo運(yùn)動(dòng)之后對(duì)待女性雇員的態(tài)度方面更是如此,但疫情已經(jīng)進(jìn)一步暴露了根深蒂固的女性和種族歧視問題,也促使該行業(yè)的一些領(lǐng)袖疾呼,餐飲業(yè)應(yīng)該在可以完全重啟之后對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的業(yè)務(wù)實(shí)踐進(jìn)行大刀闊斧的調(diào)整。
8月6日,包括湯姆·克里奇歐、大衛(wèi)·張和丹尼·梅耶在內(nèi)的50名餐館所有者,公開發(fā)布了“兼顧安全與公正的重新開業(yè)計(jì)劃”。該計(jì)劃的聯(lián)合制定方還包括由餐館員工支持者領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的非營(yíng)利性組織 One Fair Wage,該計(jì)劃的宗旨在于消除餐館按低于最低薪資標(biāo)準(zhǔn)支付收小費(fèi)員工工資的現(xiàn)象。
這個(gè)涵蓋四點(diǎn)的計(jì)劃呼吁消除按低于最低薪資標(biāo)準(zhǔn)支付收小費(fèi)員工工資的現(xiàn)象,允許與后勤與廚房員工共享小費(fèi)(在很多地區(qū)是合法的,紐約除外,不過紐約在1月允許其他行業(yè)采取這種做法),薪資稅收減免,以及允許餐館征收5%的重新開業(yè)安全附加費(fèi)。
附加費(fèi)以及小費(fèi)共享對(duì)于舉步維艱的餐館來說至關(guān)重要,因?yàn)榇伺e可以幫助它們重回正軌,并支付全額的最低薪資,而不是通過小費(fèi)來湊數(shù)。很多批評(píng)人士將小費(fèi)作為薪資的做法稱為可能會(huì)助長(zhǎng)性騷擾的內(nèi)部種族歧視。One Fair Wage總裁薩魯·加雅拉曼對(duì)《食客》(Eater)雜志說,那些正逐步取消以小費(fèi)充當(dāng)最低薪資(不會(huì)立刻消失,而是在未來五年之內(nèi))的餐館將需要更多的立法支持,這也是為什么該計(jì)劃同時(shí)還提出了小費(fèi)共享以及征收附加費(fèi)的原因。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
Dining remains the hardest-hit industry for unemployment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, based on the latest figures published on August 7 in July's jobs report.
One in four U.S. jobs lost during the pandemic have been in restaurants and bars, and the total jobless rate sits at 10.2% as Congress continues to debate a second stimulus package and a replacement for expired $600 unemployment benefit. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) jobs report found the total number of unemployed Americans stood at 16.3 million in July, an improvement from the 23.1 million unemployed in April as some states have, at least partially, reopened their economies.
And yet, independent restaurants have only received approximately 8.1% of Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) dollars despite facing the worst job losses across major industries, according to the Independent Restaurant Coalition (IRC). The grassroots organization, led by a number of chefs and restaurateurs nationwide, warns that 11 million independent restaurant employees will lose their jobs forever without immediate action.
"The July employment report shows that PPP isn't working for restaurants, and another loan program won't work either," the IRC wrote in a statement on August 7. "PPP was an eight week solution to an eighteen month problem, and we need additional relief from Congress urgently to ensure there are jobs we can return to next year. Restaurants are already in more debt than ever before, paying back PPP loans, suppliers, or our employees. One in three are expected to permanently close by the end of the year. We need grants to help offset the cost of reopening when it’s safe to do so."
Most states provide unemployment benefits up to 26 weeks, but supplemental $600 checks each week from the federal government have proven critical for millions of out-of-work Americans to continue paying their bills since mid-March. However the federal unemployment funding expired at the end of July, and Congress hasn't moved any closer to renewing unemployment benefits anytime soon. While some states have stepped in to offer extra unemployment funding for as much as 20 extra weeks, without additional unemployment funding as the pandemic continues and many businesses remain shutdown, millions of Americans are at risk of defaulting on rent, mortgages, and other bills as well as just putting food on the table for their families.
Restaurants and bars, especially when compared to other retail businesses, have struggled with reopening, whether it be trying to comply with constantly changing regulations for outdoor seating and installations to just getting patrons to social distance and wear a mask when possible. The effort has become so overwhelming for many businesses that they re-closed altogether rather than putting their employees' physical and mental health at further risk.
Even for dining establishments that can reopen, many states still prohibit indoor service in order to curb the spread of COVID-19, and those that can serve outdoors often have to reckon with mercurial summer weather between heat waves and torrential storms passing through. Al fresco dining is running against the clock as permits for extra curbside and parking spot seating are set to expire in September and October as many cities anticipate car traffic to pick up again once summer is over. Even for restaurants that survive that long and are financially able to install outdoor heat lamps (despite their energy consumption), winter is still coming, and outdoor dining will not be feasible in many regions at all, reducing service back to takeout and delivery.
While there has been more of a spotlight on the restaurant industry's problems in the last few years—especially on the treatment of female employees in the wake of the #MeToo movement—the pandemic has further exposed deeply-engrained misogynistic and racist attitudes, prompting some leaders in the industry to call for a complete overhaul of traditional business practices when a complete reopening is possible.
On August 6, 50 restaurant owners—including Tom Colicchio, David Chang, and Danny Meyer—publicly proposed the "Safe and Just Reopening Plan," developed in partnership with One Fair Wage, a nonprofit led by advocates for restaurant workers to end the sub-minimum wage for tipped workers.
The four-point plan calls for the elimination of the sub-minimum tipped wage, allowance of tip sharing with back-of-house and kitchen staff (which is legal elsewhere, but not in New York despite extending that benefit to other industries in January), payroll tax relief, and the establishment of a 5% safe reopening surcharge that restaurants can charge.
The surcharge coupled with tip sharing are critical as restaurants struggle to get back on their feet but also commit to paying a full minimum wage, rather than subsidizing wages by tips, which many critics have called out as an inherently racist practice that also perpetuates sexual harassment. One Fair Wage president Saru Jayaraman told Eater that restaurant owners moving toward eliminating the tipped minimum wage—which wouldn't happen overnight but rather over the next five years—would require more legislative support, which is why the plan also advocates for tip sharing and surcharges.