7月10日的熱帶風(fēng)暴“費(fèi)伊”給美國東海岸的大部分地區(qū)帶來了強(qiáng)風(fēng)天氣和大量降雨,創(chuàng)下了新的氣象紀(jì)錄。
6人因?yàn)椤百M(fèi)伊”造成的洪水和離岸流而喪生,其帶來的惡劣天氣造成了約4億美元的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失,但“費(fèi)伊”的破壞力算不上極強(qiáng)。“費(fèi)伊”是2020年第六個(gè)被命名的大西洋熱帶風(fēng)暴,也是今年第三個(gè)登陸美國的熱帶風(fēng)暴。
美國的颶風(fēng)季節(jié)從每年的6月1日開始。而今年颶風(fēng)季開始后,短時(shí)間內(nèi)出現(xiàn)的熱帶風(fēng)暴數(shù)量則創(chuàng)下了新的紀(jì)錄。
目前看來,“費(fèi)伊”證實(shí)了由政府、專家學(xué)者和私人氣象預(yù)測(cè)機(jī)構(gòu)提出的一系列預(yù)測(cè),即2020年的大西洋颶風(fēng)季節(jié)活躍度將高于正常水平。
巨災(zāi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)證券
但是,對(duì)于深處市場(chǎng)某個(gè)不知名角落里的一群特殊投資者來說,接二連三發(fā)生的災(zāi)難事件意味著新機(jī)遇:這就是巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)。在這個(gè)市場(chǎng)中,災(zāi)難的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)被精細(xì)地權(quán)衡并分批分配,圣加布里埃爾山脈的山火或是將墨西哥灣暖流卷向邁阿密的五級(jí)颶風(fēng),再加上一場(chǎng)全球性疫情大流行,可能意味著非常有利可圖的一年,也可能造成全面的崩盤。
巨災(zāi)債券簡(jiǎn)稱CAT債券,最早出現(xiàn)在20世紀(jì)90年代早期。1992年,保險(xiǎn)業(yè)在經(jīng)歷了颶風(fēng)“安德魯”造成的重創(chuàng)后創(chuàng)立了巨災(zāi)債券,旨在讓保險(xiǎn)公司能夠進(jìn)一步對(duì)沖風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
巨災(zāi)債券本質(zhì)上其實(shí)是另一種再保險(xiǎn)形式。保險(xiǎn)公司和再保險(xiǎn)公司有時(shí)也需要尋找后盾,它們發(fā)行了一種債券來覆蓋特定地區(qū)在一定年限內(nèi)會(huì)發(fā)生的某一種災(zāi)難的風(fēng)險(xiǎn):襲擊佛羅里達(dá)州的強(qiáng)熱帶風(fēng)暴、加利福尼亞州的山火、發(fā)生在美國的地震或是歐洲的大風(fēng)暴等等。
巨災(zāi)債券公開發(fā)行后,未來債券本金及債息的償還與否,完全根據(jù)巨災(zāi)損失發(fā)生情況而定。對(duì)于大多數(shù)巨災(zāi)債券來說很重要的一點(diǎn)是,如果災(zāi)難發(fā)生在債券的有效期內(nèi),投保人的承保損失超過了預(yù)先規(guī)定的限額,債權(quán)人就會(huì)損失他們投資的本金,保險(xiǎn)公司則可以用這筆錢來支付索賠。而作為承擔(dān)這一風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的交換條件,投資者能夠通過巨災(zāi)債券獲得遠(yuǎn)高于正常水平的利潤率,許多巨災(zāi)債券的利率約為7%至12%。
巨災(zāi)債券的另外一個(gè)頗受投資者青睞的特質(zhì)是它與其他金融市場(chǎng)之間沒有任何相關(guān)性。畢竟,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)普爾500指數(shù)的走勢(shì)完全影響不到圣安德烈亞斯斷層(San Andreas Fault)的運(yùn)動(dòng)。因此,巨災(zāi)債券有利于投資組合的多元化。此外,MMC證券公司的首席執(zhí)行官、再保險(xiǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)公司Guy Carpenter的總裁希夫?庫馬爾表示,投資巨災(zāi)債券的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)比垃圾債券或許多不同的股票要低,平均預(yù)期損失率一般在中、低個(gè)位數(shù),投資者損失全部本金的情況則相對(duì)較為少見。
表現(xiàn)強(qiáng)勁的一年
在疫情之前,巨災(zāi)債券的發(fā)行量達(dá)到了創(chuàng)紀(jì)錄的水平。2019年全年共發(fā)行了價(jià)值110億美元的巨災(zāi)債券及相關(guān)證券。Artemis是一家專門跟蹤巨災(zāi)債券等“保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券”(ILS)市場(chǎng)的公司。該公司的數(shù)據(jù)表明,今年迄今為止,已經(jīng)通過34宗交易售出了價(jià)值92億美元的巨災(zāi)債券。因此,2020年的巨災(zāi)債券發(fā)行規(guī)模有望超過2018年創(chuàng)下的行業(yè)歷史紀(jì)錄——138億美元。
庫馬爾表示,新冠疫情大流行開始時(shí)出現(xiàn)了一波巨災(zāi)債券交易,3月有超過20億美元的巨災(zāi)債券成交——對(duì)沖基金試圖從中獲利并用巨災(zāi)債券來彌補(bǔ)投資組合中的其他損失。庫馬爾任職的兩家公司(MMC證券公司和再保險(xiǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)公司Guy Carpenter)都隸屬于保險(xiǎn)服務(wù)公司Marsh & McLennan Companies。
庫馬爾表示,巨災(zāi)債券的價(jià)值表現(xiàn)穩(wěn)定。2020年第二季度,巨災(zāi)債券指數(shù)僅下跌了1%,而標(biāo)準(zhǔn)普爾500指數(shù)則下跌了20%。該市場(chǎng)背后的支持者是一批專業(yè)基金經(jīng)理,他們通過養(yǎng)老金和捐贈(zèng)基金專注于投資巨災(zāi)債券和其他保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券。疫情爆發(fā)后,新債券的發(fā)行也一直保持強(qiáng)勁勢(shì)頭,今年3月至今已有17只債券上市。其中也包括紐約大都會(huì)運(yùn)輸署(New York City Metropolitan Transport Authority)發(fā)行的1億美元債券,用于應(yīng)對(duì)颶風(fēng)(如2012年的颶風(fēng)“桑迪”)帶來的嚴(yán)重洪災(zāi)或地震等風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
標(biāo)普全球評(píng)級(jí)負(fù)責(zé)巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)的信貸分析師馬倫?約瑟夫指出,大量新巨災(zāi)債券的發(fā)行反映出兩點(diǎn)事實(shí):保險(xiǎn)公司和再保險(xiǎn)公司需要替換價(jià)值約46億美元、即將于2020年第二季度到期的現(xiàn)有債券。此外,新冠疫情在營業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)和人壽保險(xiǎn)等方面造成的損失,加上過去幾年中大量的自然災(zāi)害帶來的損失,降低了保險(xiǎn)公司和再保險(xiǎn)公司承擔(dān)額外損失的能力。因此,它們不得不轉(zhuǎn)向巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)。
地理位置、地理位置,還是地理位置
巨災(zāi)債券行業(yè)的專家們表示,異常活躍的颶風(fēng)季節(jié)并不會(huì)讓一個(gè)專門押注于災(zāi)難的市場(chǎng)感到恐慌。標(biāo)普全球評(píng)級(jí)的信貸分析師約瑟夫說:“我們預(yù)計(jì),新發(fā)行的債券量并不會(huì)因?yàn)槿藗儗?duì)今年颶風(fēng)季的氣象預(yù)測(cè)而出現(xiàn)下降。”
對(duì)債券投資者來說,風(fēng)暴的頻率甚至其嚴(yán)重程度,遠(yuǎn)不及風(fēng)暴是否會(huì)襲擊一個(gè)擁有高房產(chǎn)價(jià)值的人口稠密地區(qū)更為重要。Karen Clark & Company公司專門向發(fā)行巨災(zāi)債券的保險(xiǎn)公司以及投資此類債券的基金提供成熟而領(lǐng)先的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)損失建模技術(shù)。該公司的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼首席執(zhí)行官卡倫?克拉克說:“災(zāi)難跟房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)很像,最重要的關(guān)注點(diǎn)就是地理位置、地理位置,以及地理位置。”
Fermat資本管理公司管理著價(jià)值70億美元的基金,投資巨災(zāi)債券和其他保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券。該公司的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼常務(wù)董事約翰?徐表示,自2006年以來,每年都會(huì)有新的氣象預(yù)測(cè)指出該年的颶風(fēng)季節(jié)將比往常更為活躍。他說,債券投資者用來衡量風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的巨災(zāi)債券模型已經(jīng)“消化了這一點(diǎn)”。
但實(shí)際上,新冠肺炎疫情增加了颶風(fēng)帶來的風(fēng)險(xiǎn):擁擠的避難場(chǎng)所可能會(huì)成為疫情聚集傳播的溫床,因此會(huì)加劇將受災(zāi)民眾轉(zhuǎn)移至避難場(chǎng)所的擔(dān)憂,進(jìn)而也會(huì)增加將民眾從風(fēng)暴路徑上撤離的工作難度。
同樣重要的一點(diǎn)是,對(duì)感染的擔(dān)憂,可能會(huì)增加保險(xiǎn)公司在災(zāi)難發(fā)生后派遣理賠師進(jìn)入某個(gè)地區(qū)或是讓清理和施工人員去修復(fù)損失的工作難度。過去的經(jīng)驗(yàn)表明,處理索賠的延誤可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致整體損失大幅增加。克拉克表示,這可能會(huì)令保險(xiǎn)的損失超過它們“附加”于巨災(zāi)債券上的規(guī)定限額,導(dǎo)致投資者開始損失本金。
巨災(zāi)債券牛市
約翰?徐表示,巨災(zāi)債券債投資者要求額外獲取0.5%到1%的票面利率,來補(bǔ)償這一附加風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。但他也指出,目前市場(chǎng)最令人好奇的一點(diǎn)是,巨災(zāi)債券收益率已經(jīng)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過了這一數(shù)值。約瑟夫則表示,Lane Financial的巨災(zāi)債券指數(shù)和其他保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券利率在2020年上半年上升了25%。
他說,出現(xiàn)這種現(xiàn)象的原因主要是簡(jiǎn)單的供求關(guān)系,而不是對(duì)即將到來的對(duì)世界末日的擔(dān)憂。隨著如此多的債券進(jìn)入市場(chǎng),發(fā)行人不得不提供高利率債券來完成他們的訂單。
在幾乎所有其他產(chǎn)品的利率都處于歷史低點(diǎn)之際,巨災(zāi)債券超高的收益率正吸引越來越多的資產(chǎn)管理公司進(jìn)入該領(lǐng)域。約翰?徐表示,二級(jí)市場(chǎng)對(duì)巨災(zāi)債券的需求尤其強(qiáng)勁,而現(xiàn)有證券都在二級(jí)市場(chǎng)進(jìn)行交易。巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)完全是場(chǎng)外交易,沒有中央交易所。他指出,他每天早上都會(huì)收到一封電子郵件,里面列出了愿意買賣巨災(zāi)債券的人的名單,目前買家與賣家的數(shù)量比例約為10比1。
有跡象表明,市場(chǎng)可能正在開始做出調(diào)整。評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)惠譽(yù)負(fù)責(zé)巨災(zāi)債券的分析師克里斯托弗?格里姆斯表示,一些災(zāi)難性事件(比如襲擊南佛羅里達(dá)州的颶風(fēng))要求的票面利率太高,以至于保險(xiǎn)公司開始退出市場(chǎng)。他指出,佛羅里達(dá)州公民財(cái)產(chǎn)保險(xiǎn)公司(Florida Citizens Property Insurance)以投資者在尋求“非理性回報(bào)”為由,在5月取消了2億美元巨災(zāi)債券的發(fā)行。
熱帶風(fēng)暴“費(fèi)伊”造成的影響已經(jīng)在迅速消失。但是,如果這場(chǎng)風(fēng)暴最終真的成為了一種預(yù)兆,而且其預(yù)測(cè)的結(jié)果是正確的,那么預(yù)計(jì)今年的巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)將會(huì)出現(xiàn)大量的行動(dòng)。買賣特定的巨災(zāi)債券通常會(huì)在風(fēng)暴登陸前的一兩天里升溫,因?yàn)橥顿Y者使用著專有的預(yù)測(cè)模型,試圖準(zhǔn)確預(yù)測(cè)風(fēng)暴可能襲擊的地點(diǎn)以及可能造成的損失。
新冠疫情大流行對(duì)保險(xiǎn)公司造成了沉重的打擊,許多營業(yè)中斷方面的索賠尚未解決。而且由于死亡人數(shù)慘重,人壽保險(xiǎn)的索賠額也高于預(yù)期。
世界衛(wèi)生組織(WHO)在2016年發(fā)行了一種特殊的巨災(zāi)債券來幫助應(yīng)對(duì)未來的大流行病。這一債券由今年的新冠肺炎疫情觸發(fā),部分債券持有人因此損失了本金。(這種債券被稱為參數(shù)型巨災(zāi)債券:如果債券條款中定義的特定事件發(fā)生,它就會(huì)賠付,而不是將其觸發(fā)器設(shè)置為保險(xiǎn)損失的美元價(jià)值。)但在大多數(shù)情況下,巨災(zāi)債券并不是針對(duì)流行病發(fā)行的。庫馬爾認(rèn)為其中原因在于,正如新冠肺炎疫情所證實(shí)的那樣,流行病與其他金融市場(chǎng)的損失具有一定的相關(guān)性,因此并不具備多元化優(yōu)勢(shì)。
約翰?徐則表示,世界衛(wèi)生組織發(fā)行的大流行病債券給他造成了虧損。他認(rèn)為,與大流行病和其他市場(chǎng)目前尚未涵蓋到的不尋常風(fēng)險(xiǎn)有關(guān)的巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)繁榮跡象。他指出,這是因?yàn)橥顿Y者已經(jīng)暗中承擔(dān)了此類對(duì)金融市場(chǎng)有著極強(qiáng)破壞性的災(zāi)難帶來的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)——包括大流行病或嚴(yán)重的火山噴發(fā)等,但他們沒有得到任何補(bǔ)償。他還表示,巨災(zāi)債券的作用是將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)顯性化,并允許投資者從中獲利。因此,對(duì)養(yǎng)老基金和捐贈(zèng)基金等成熟的機(jī)構(gòu)投資者來說,這有助于他們對(duì)投資組合進(jìn)行優(yōu)化。
克拉克說,雖然巨災(zāi)債券可能有助于降低未來大流行病帶來的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),但建立模型預(yù)測(cè)疾病的爆發(fā)模式并了解損失程度等方面的障礙,可能會(huì)給投資結(jié)構(gòu)帶來一定的困難。她表示,這類債券基本只能是由事件本身引發(fā)的參數(shù)債券,而不是從實(shí)際損失出發(fā)的巨災(zāi)債券。
惠譽(yù)的分析師格里姆斯稱,除了流行病以外,人們還會(huì)時(shí)不時(shí)地針對(duì)火山爆發(fā)甚至流星撞擊等罕見的災(zāi)難事件來發(fā)行參數(shù)型巨災(zāi)債券。
這又有什么不對(duì)呢?畢竟,未來主義者芭芭拉?馬克思?哈伯德曾經(jīng)說過,災(zāi)難與創(chuàng)造是一對(duì)“雙胞胎”。她談?wù)摰碾m然不是債券市場(chǎng),但這句話對(duì)債券市場(chǎng)來說同樣適用。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:Feb
7月10日的熱帶風(fēng)暴“費(fèi)伊”給美國東海岸的大部分地區(qū)帶來了強(qiáng)風(fēng)天氣和大量降雨,創(chuàng)下了新的氣象紀(jì)錄。
6人因?yàn)椤百M(fèi)伊”造成的洪水和離岸流而喪生,其帶來的惡劣天氣造成了約4億美元的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失,但“費(fèi)伊”的破壞力算不上極強(qiáng)。“費(fèi)伊”是2020年第六個(gè)被命名的大西洋熱帶風(fēng)暴,也是今年第三個(gè)登陸美國的熱帶風(fēng)暴。
美國的颶風(fēng)季節(jié)從每年的6月1日開始。而今年颶風(fēng)季開始后,短時(shí)間內(nèi)出現(xiàn)的熱帶風(fēng)暴數(shù)量則創(chuàng)下了新的紀(jì)錄。
目前看來,“費(fèi)伊”證實(shí)了由政府、專家學(xué)者和私人氣象預(yù)測(cè)機(jī)構(gòu)提出的一系列預(yù)測(cè),即2020年的大西洋颶風(fēng)季節(jié)活躍度將高于正常水平。
巨災(zāi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)證券
但是,對(duì)于深處市場(chǎng)某個(gè)不知名角落里的一群特殊投資者來說,接二連三發(fā)生的災(zāi)難事件意味著新機(jī)遇:這就是巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)。在這個(gè)市場(chǎng)中,災(zāi)難的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)被精細(xì)地權(quán)衡并分批分配,圣加布里埃爾山脈的山火或是將墨西哥灣暖流卷向邁阿密的五級(jí)颶風(fēng),再加上一場(chǎng)全球性疫情大流行,可能意味著非常有利可圖的一年,也可能造成全面的崩盤。
巨災(zāi)債券簡(jiǎn)稱CAT債券,最早出現(xiàn)在20世紀(jì)90年代早期。1992年,保險(xiǎn)業(yè)在經(jīng)歷了颶風(fēng)“安德魯”造成的重創(chuàng)后創(chuàng)立了巨災(zāi)債券,旨在讓保險(xiǎn)公司能夠進(jìn)一步對(duì)沖風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
巨災(zāi)債券本質(zhì)上其實(shí)是另一種再保險(xiǎn)形式。保險(xiǎn)公司和再保險(xiǎn)公司有時(shí)也需要尋找后盾,它們發(fā)行了一種債券來覆蓋特定地區(qū)在一定年限內(nèi)會(huì)發(fā)生的某一種災(zāi)難的風(fēng)險(xiǎn):襲擊佛羅里達(dá)州的強(qiáng)熱帶風(fēng)暴、加利福尼亞州的山火、發(fā)生在美國的地震或是歐洲的大風(fēng)暴等等。
巨災(zāi)債券公開發(fā)行后,未來債券本金及債息的償還與否,完全根據(jù)巨災(zāi)損失發(fā)生情況而定。對(duì)于大多數(shù)巨災(zāi)債券來說很重要的一點(diǎn)是,如果災(zāi)難發(fā)生在債券的有效期內(nèi),投保人的承保損失超過了預(yù)先規(guī)定的限額,債權(quán)人就會(huì)損失他們投資的本金,保險(xiǎn)公司則可以用這筆錢來支付索賠。而作為承擔(dān)這一風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的交換條件,投資者能夠通過巨災(zāi)債券獲得遠(yuǎn)高于正常水平的利潤率,許多巨災(zāi)債券的利率約為7%至12%。
巨災(zāi)債券的另外一個(gè)頗受投資者青睞的特質(zhì)是它與其他金融市場(chǎng)之間沒有任何相關(guān)性。畢竟,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)普爾500指數(shù)的走勢(shì)完全影響不到圣安德烈亞斯斷層(San Andreas Fault)的運(yùn)動(dòng)。因此,巨災(zāi)債券有利于投資組合的多元化。此外,MMC證券公司的首席執(zhí)行官、再保險(xiǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)公司Guy Carpenter的總裁希夫?庫馬爾表示,投資巨災(zāi)債券的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)比垃圾債券或許多不同的股票要低,平均預(yù)期損失率一般在中、低個(gè)位數(shù),投資者損失全部本金的情況則相對(duì)較為少見。
表現(xiàn)強(qiáng)勁的一年
在疫情之前,巨災(zāi)債券的發(fā)行量達(dá)到了創(chuàng)紀(jì)錄的水平。2019年全年共發(fā)行了價(jià)值110億美元的巨災(zāi)債券及相關(guān)證券。Artemis是一家專門跟蹤巨災(zāi)債券等“保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券”(ILS)市場(chǎng)的公司。該公司的數(shù)據(jù)表明,今年迄今為止,已經(jīng)通過34宗交易售出了價(jià)值92億美元的巨災(zāi)債券。因此,2020年的巨災(zāi)債券發(fā)行規(guī)模有望超過2018年創(chuàng)下的行業(yè)歷史紀(jì)錄——138億美元。
庫馬爾表示,新冠疫情大流行開始時(shí)出現(xiàn)了一波巨災(zāi)債券交易,3月有超過20億美元的巨災(zāi)債券成交——對(duì)沖基金試圖從中獲利并用巨災(zāi)債券來彌補(bǔ)投資組合中的其他損失。庫馬爾任職的兩家公司(MMC證券公司和再保險(xiǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)公司Guy Carpenter)都隸屬于保險(xiǎn)服務(wù)公司Marsh & McLennan Companies。
庫馬爾表示,巨災(zāi)債券的價(jià)值表現(xiàn)穩(wěn)定。2020年第二季度,巨災(zāi)債券指數(shù)僅下跌了1%,而標(biāo)準(zhǔn)普爾500指數(shù)則下跌了20%。該市場(chǎng)背后的支持者是一批專業(yè)基金經(jīng)理,他們通過養(yǎng)老金和捐贈(zèng)基金專注于投資巨災(zāi)債券和其他保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券。疫情爆發(fā)后,新債券的發(fā)行也一直保持強(qiáng)勁勢(shì)頭,今年3月至今已有17只債券上市。其中也包括紐約大都會(huì)運(yùn)輸署(New York City Metropolitan Transport Authority)發(fā)行的1億美元債券,用于應(yīng)對(duì)颶風(fēng)(如2012年的颶風(fēng)“桑迪”)帶來的嚴(yán)重洪災(zāi)或地震等風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。
標(biāo)普全球評(píng)級(jí)負(fù)責(zé)巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)的信貸分析師馬倫?約瑟夫指出,大量新巨災(zāi)債券的發(fā)行反映出兩點(diǎn)事實(shí):保險(xiǎn)公司和再保險(xiǎn)公司需要替換價(jià)值約46億美元、即將于2020年第二季度到期的現(xiàn)有債券。此外,新冠疫情在營業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)和人壽保險(xiǎn)等方面造成的損失,加上過去幾年中大量的自然災(zāi)害帶來的損失,降低了保險(xiǎn)公司和再保險(xiǎn)公司承擔(dān)額外損失的能力。因此,它們不得不轉(zhuǎn)向巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)。
地理位置、地理位置,還是地理位置
巨災(zāi)債券行業(yè)的專家們表示,異常活躍的颶風(fēng)季節(jié)并不會(huì)讓一個(gè)專門押注于災(zāi)難的市場(chǎng)感到恐慌。標(biāo)普全球評(píng)級(jí)的信貸分析師約瑟夫說:“我們預(yù)計(jì),新發(fā)行的債券量并不會(huì)因?yàn)槿藗儗?duì)今年颶風(fēng)季的氣象預(yù)測(cè)而出現(xiàn)下降。”
對(duì)債券投資者來說,風(fēng)暴的頻率甚至其嚴(yán)重程度,遠(yuǎn)不及風(fēng)暴是否會(huì)襲擊一個(gè)擁有高房產(chǎn)價(jià)值的人口稠密地區(qū)更為重要。Karen Clark & Company公司專門向發(fā)行巨災(zāi)債券的保險(xiǎn)公司以及投資此類債券的基金提供成熟而領(lǐng)先的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)損失建模技術(shù)。該公司的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼首席執(zhí)行官卡倫?克拉克說:“災(zāi)難跟房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)很像,最重要的關(guān)注點(diǎn)就是地理位置、地理位置,以及地理位置。”
Fermat資本管理公司管理著價(jià)值70億美元的基金,投資巨災(zāi)債券和其他保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券。該公司的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼常務(wù)董事約翰?徐表示,自2006年以來,每年都會(huì)有新的氣象預(yù)測(cè)指出該年的颶風(fēng)季節(jié)將比往常更為活躍。他說,債券投資者用來衡量風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的巨災(zāi)債券模型已經(jīng)“消化了這一點(diǎn)”。
但實(shí)際上,新冠肺炎疫情增加了颶風(fēng)帶來的風(fēng)險(xiǎn):擁擠的避難場(chǎng)所可能會(huì)成為疫情聚集傳播的溫床,因此會(huì)加劇將受災(zāi)民眾轉(zhuǎn)移至避難場(chǎng)所的擔(dān)憂,進(jìn)而也會(huì)增加將民眾從風(fēng)暴路徑上撤離的工作難度。
同樣重要的一點(diǎn)是,對(duì)感染的擔(dān)憂,可能會(huì)增加保險(xiǎn)公司在災(zāi)難發(fā)生后派遣理賠師進(jìn)入某個(gè)地區(qū)或是讓清理和施工人員去修復(fù)損失的工作難度。過去的經(jīng)驗(yàn)表明,處理索賠的延誤可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致整體損失大幅增加。克拉克表示,這可能會(huì)令保險(xiǎn)的損失超過它們“附加”于巨災(zāi)債券上的規(guī)定限額,導(dǎo)致投資者開始損失本金。
巨災(zāi)債券牛市
約翰?徐表示,巨災(zāi)債券債投資者要求額外獲取0.5%到1%的票面利率,來補(bǔ)償這一附加風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。但他也指出,目前市場(chǎng)最令人好奇的一點(diǎn)是,巨災(zāi)債券收益率已經(jīng)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過了這一數(shù)值。約瑟夫則表示,Lane Financial的巨災(zāi)債券指數(shù)和其他保險(xiǎn)相關(guān)證券利率在2020年上半年上升了25%。
他說,出現(xiàn)這種現(xiàn)象的原因主要是簡(jiǎn)單的供求關(guān)系,而不是對(duì)即將到來的對(duì)世界末日的擔(dān)憂。隨著如此多的債券進(jìn)入市場(chǎng),發(fā)行人不得不提供高利率債券來完成他們的訂單。
在幾乎所有其他產(chǎn)品的利率都處于歷史低點(diǎn)之際,巨災(zāi)債券超高的收益率正吸引越來越多的資產(chǎn)管理公司進(jìn)入該領(lǐng)域。約翰?徐表示,二級(jí)市場(chǎng)對(duì)巨災(zāi)債券的需求尤其強(qiáng)勁,而現(xiàn)有證券都在二級(jí)市場(chǎng)進(jìn)行交易。巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)完全是場(chǎng)外交易,沒有中央交易所。他指出,他每天早上都會(huì)收到一封電子郵件,里面列出了愿意買賣巨災(zāi)債券的人的名單,目前買家與賣家的數(shù)量比例約為10比1。
有跡象表明,市場(chǎng)可能正在開始做出調(diào)整。評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)惠譽(yù)負(fù)責(zé)巨災(zāi)債券的分析師克里斯托弗?格里姆斯表示,一些災(zāi)難性事件(比如襲擊南佛羅里達(dá)州的颶風(fēng))要求的票面利率太高,以至于保險(xiǎn)公司開始退出市場(chǎng)。他指出,佛羅里達(dá)州公民財(cái)產(chǎn)保險(xiǎn)公司(Florida Citizens Property Insurance)以投資者在尋求“非理性回報(bào)”為由,在5月取消了2億美元巨災(zāi)債券的發(fā)行。
熱帶風(fēng)暴“費(fèi)伊”造成的影響已經(jīng)在迅速消失。但是,如果這場(chǎng)風(fēng)暴最終真的成為了一種預(yù)兆,而且其預(yù)測(cè)的結(jié)果是正確的,那么預(yù)計(jì)今年的巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)將會(huì)出現(xiàn)大量的行動(dòng)。買賣特定的巨災(zāi)債券通常會(huì)在風(fēng)暴登陸前的一兩天里升溫,因?yàn)橥顿Y者使用著專有的預(yù)測(cè)模型,試圖準(zhǔn)確預(yù)測(cè)風(fēng)暴可能襲擊的地點(diǎn)以及可能造成的損失。
新冠疫情大流行對(duì)保險(xiǎn)公司造成了沉重的打擊,許多營業(yè)中斷方面的索賠尚未解決。而且由于死亡人數(shù)慘重,人壽保險(xiǎn)的索賠額也高于預(yù)期。
世界衛(wèi)生組織(WHO)在2016年發(fā)行了一種特殊的巨災(zāi)債券來幫助應(yīng)對(duì)未來的大流行病。這一債券由今年的新冠肺炎疫情觸發(fā),部分債券持有人因此損失了本金。(這種債券被稱為參數(shù)型巨災(zāi)債券:如果債券條款中定義的特定事件發(fā)生,它就會(huì)賠付,而不是將其觸發(fā)器設(shè)置為保險(xiǎn)損失的美元價(jià)值。)但在大多數(shù)情況下,巨災(zāi)債券并不是針對(duì)流行病發(fā)行的。庫馬爾認(rèn)為其中原因在于,正如新冠肺炎疫情所證實(shí)的那樣,流行病與其他金融市場(chǎng)的損失具有一定的相關(guān)性,因此并不具備多元化優(yōu)勢(shì)。
約翰?徐則表示,世界衛(wèi)生組織發(fā)行的大流行病債券給他造成了虧損。他認(rèn)為,與大流行病和其他市場(chǎng)目前尚未涵蓋到的不尋常風(fēng)險(xiǎn)有關(guān)的巨災(zāi)債券市場(chǎng)可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)繁榮跡象。他指出,這是因?yàn)橥顿Y者已經(jīng)暗中承擔(dān)了此類對(duì)金融市場(chǎng)有著極強(qiáng)破壞性的災(zāi)難帶來的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)——包括大流行病或嚴(yán)重的火山噴發(fā)等,但他們沒有得到任何補(bǔ)償。他還表示,巨災(zāi)債券的作用是將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)顯性化,并允許投資者從中獲利。因此,對(duì)養(yǎng)老基金和捐贈(zèng)基金等成熟的機(jī)構(gòu)投資者來說,這有助于他們對(duì)投資組合進(jìn)行優(yōu)化。
克拉克說,雖然巨災(zāi)債券可能有助于降低未來大流行病帶來的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),但建立模型預(yù)測(cè)疾病的爆發(fā)模式并了解損失程度等方面的障礙,可能會(huì)給投資結(jié)構(gòu)帶來一定的困難。她表示,這類債券基本只能是由事件本身引發(fā)的參數(shù)債券,而不是從實(shí)際損失出發(fā)的巨災(zāi)債券。
惠譽(yù)的分析師格里姆斯稱,除了流行病以外,人們還會(huì)時(shí)不時(shí)地針對(duì)火山爆發(fā)甚至流星撞擊等罕見的災(zāi)難事件來發(fā)行參數(shù)型巨災(zāi)債券。
這又有什么不對(duì)呢?畢竟,未來主義者芭芭拉?馬克思?哈伯德曾經(jīng)說過,災(zāi)難與創(chuàng)造是一對(duì)“雙胞胎”。她談?wù)摰碾m然不是債券市場(chǎng),但這句話對(duì)債券市場(chǎng)來說同樣適用。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:Feb
July 10’s tropical storm Fay, which brought heavy rain and high winds to much of the U.S. East Coast, was a record-breaker.
It’s not that Fay was particularly fierce—although six people were killed in flooding and rip tides and the weather system caused an estimated $400 million in damage. But Fay was the sixth named Atlantic storm of the 2020 and the third to make landfall in the U.S.
The hurricane season only began on June 1 and this is the first time there have been so many tropical storms so early in the year.
Fay seemed to confirm a series of predictions, put out by government, academic and private weather forecasters, that 2020 will be a busier-than-usual Atlantic hurricane season. For many, those prognostications are further evidence that 2020 is a cursed year: with the Covid-19 pandemic still raging, did we really need more Biblical plagues?
Cat bonds
But for a special breed of investor in an obscure corner of the market, the confluence of catastrophes spells opportunity: welcome to the cat bond market, where the risk of calamity is finely weighed and parceled out in tranches, and where a wildfire in the San Gabriel Mountains or a Category 5 beast churning up the Gulf Stream towards Miami, coming on top of a global pandemic, can make for a very profitable year—or a complete wipeout.
Catastrophe bonds, or cat bonds for short, have been around since the early 1990s. They were created after the insurance industry experienced debilitating losses from 1992’s Hurricane Andrew, and were designed so that insurers could further hedge their risk.
In essence, cat bonds are an alternative form of reinsurance. Insurance companies—or sometimes reinsurance companies, themselves looking for a backstop—issue a bond to cover the risk from one kind of catastrophe in a particular location for a certain number of years: a named tropical storm hitting Florida, California wildfires, U.S. earthquakes or European wind storms.
If that event occurs during the life of the bond and—importantly, for most cat bonds—if the insured losses are above a pre-specified threshold, the creditors forfeit their principal, which the insurance company can use to pay claims. In exchange for taking on that risk, the investors earn an unusually high interest rate—between about 7% and 12% for many bonds. Investors also like that cat bonds aren’t correlated to other financial markets—after all, movements in the S&P 500 don’t move the San Andreas Fault—so they were good for portfolio diversification. What’s more, the investments are actually less risky than say, junk bonds, or many equities, Kumar says. Expected loss ratios generally average in the low- to mid-single digit percentages, and the cases in which investors have lost their entire principal are relatively rare.
A banner year
Cat bond issuance was at record levels prior the COVID-19 pandemic. In all of 2019, $11 billion worth of cat bonds and related securities were issued. So far this year, $9.2 billion have been sold in 34 different transactions, according to data from Artemis, a company that tracks the market for what are known as “insurance-linked securities” (or ILS), of which cat bonds are one type. That puts 2020 on track to exceed the $13.8 billion issued in 2018, which the industry’s biggest year so far.
The start of the pandemic saw a flurry of cat bond trading, with more than $2 billion in bonds trading hands in March as hedge funds sought to take profits and use them to cover losses elsewhere in their portfolios, says Shiv Kumar, the CEO of MMC Securities and president of reinsurance broker Guy Carpenter, both of which are part of insurance services firm Marsh & McLennan Companies.
Cat bond values held up well—an index of cat bonds was down just 1% in the second quarter of 2020 compared to a 20% decline in the S&P 500—and the market is supported by a number of specialized money managers, backed by pension funds and endowments, that only invest cat bonds and other ILS instruments, Kumar says. Issuance of new bonds has also remained strong since the pandemic began, with 17 bonds coming to market since March. This includes a $100 million bond issued by the New York City Metropolitan Transport Authority to cover the risk of severe flooding from a storm surge, like 2012’s Hurricane Sandy, or an earthquake.
Maren Josefs, a credit analyst at S&P Global Ratings who covers the cat bond market, says the large number of new bonds on offer reflects two factors: insurance and reinsurance companies needed to replace about $4.6 billion worth of existing bonds that matured in the second quarter of 2020. Additionally, losses—both in terms of business interruption coverage and life insurance from COVID-19, plus a fair number of natural disasters over the past few years—have left insurers and reinsurers with less capacity to absorb additional losses, so they’ve had to turn to the cat bond market.
Location, location, location
An unusually busy hurricane season is not, cat bond experts say, something to spook a market dedicated to wagering on disaster. “We do not expect a drop in new issuance due to the hurricane season forecast,” S&P’s Josefs says.
The frequency of storms, and even their severity, matters far less to cat bond investors than whether a storm strikes a populated area with high property values. “Catastrophes are like real estate, it is location, location, location,” says Karen Clark, the co-founder and CEO of Karen Clark & Company, a firm that licenses sophisticated loss models to insurers who issue cat bonds and funds that invest in them.
John Seo, co-founder and managing director Fermat Capital Management, a $7 billion fund that invests in cat bonds and other insurance-related instruments, notes that a busier-than-normal hurricane season has been forecast every year since 2006. The models cat bond investors use to gauge risk already “bake that in,” he says.
But COVID-19 actually increases the risks from hurricanes: fear of moving people into crowded shelters that could become breeding grounds for the infection might make it difficult to evacuate people from the path of storms.
As importantly, concerns about infection may make it more difficult for insurance companies to send loss adjustors into an area after a disaster or for clean-up and construction crews to come in and repair the damage. Past experience has shown that delays in processing claims can result in a big bump in overall losses. Clark says this could push insured losses past the thresholds at which they “attach” to a cat bond, causing investors to begin to lose their principal.
A bull market for cat bonds
Seo says that cat bond investors are demanding an extra .5% to 1% in coupon rates to compensate for this added risk. But what’s curious about the market at the moment, he says, is that cat bond yields have risen well past these levels. Josefs notes that Lane Financial’s index of cat bonds and other ILS security rates is up 25% in the first half of 2020.
The reason, he says, is more about simple supply and demand rather than concerns about impending Armageddon. With so many bonds coming to market, issuers are having to offer high coupons to fill their order books.
Those outsized yields, coming at a time when interest rates for almost everything else are at historic lows, are drawing more and more asset managers into cat bonds. Demand for cat bonds is especially strong in the secondary market, where existing securities trade hands, Seo says. Every morning he gets an email—the cat bond market is conducted entirely over-the-counter, with no centralized exchange—listing those offering to buy or sell bonds, and buyers currently exceed sellers by about 10-to-1, he says.
There are nascent signs the market might be starting to adjust. Christopher Grimes, an analyst who covers cat bonds for ratings agency Fitch, says that the coupon rates being demanded for some catastrophes—like a major hurricane hitting South Florida—have gotten so high that insurance companies are starting to pull out of the market. He notes that Florida Citizens Property Insurance pulled the issuance of a $200 million cat bond tranche in May citing investors seeking “irrational returns.”
Memories of Fay are already fading fast. But if the storm does wind up becoming a harbinger, and the forecast proves correct, expect plenty of action in the cat bond market this year. Trading in and out of particular cat bonds usually heats up in the day or two before storms make landfall, as investors use proprietary forecasting models to try to predict exactly where a storm might hit and what kind of losses it could cause.
The Covid-19 pandemic has hit insurance companies hard, with many unresolved issues over business interruption claims—and, with the tragic number of deaths, higher-than-expected life insurance claims.
The World Health Organization did issue a special kind of cat bond back in 2016 to help it deal with a future pandemic. That bond was triggered—wiping out the principal for some bond holders—by the year's COVID-19. (The bond was what is called a parametric cat bond: it pays out if a certain event, defined in the bond’s terms, occurs, as opposed to having a trigger set to a dollar value of insured losses.) But for the most part, cat bonds have not been issued for pandemics. Kumar says this because, as COVID-19 makes clear, pandemics are not uncorrelated with other financial market losses and so the diversification advantage isn’t there.
But Seo, who says he lost money on the WHO pandemic bonds, thinks there could be a thriving market for cat bonds linked to pandemics and other unusual risks not currently covered by the market. The reason? He says investors already implicitly bear the risk of such catastrophes—whether it be a pandemic or a major volcanic eruption— tanking financial markets, but they aren’t receiving any compensation for it. What a cat bond does, he says, is make that risk explicit and allow investors to collect on it. So, for sophisticated institutional investors like pension funds and endowments, it bolsters their portfolio optimization metrics, Seo says.
Clark says that while cat bonds might be useful for mitigating future pandemic risk, the difficulty of modeling disease outbreaks and understanding the extent of losses, might cause problems for structuring the investments. They would almost certainly have to be parametric bonds, triggered by the event itself, rather than actual losses, she says.
In addition to pandemics, parametric cat bonds have been issued from time to time to cover unusual events—volcanic eruptions and even meteor strikes, Fitch’s Grimes says.
Why not? After all, futurist Barbara Marx Hubbard once said catastrophe and creation are twins. She wasn’t talking about the bond market, but she might as well have been.