精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清,国产精品成人久久久久,国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

美國(guó)的救助金計(jì)劃即將到期,之后怎么辦?

Lance Lambert
2020-07-05

一旦聯(lián)邦失業(yè)救助金消失后,1950萬(wàn)領(lǐng)取失業(yè)保險(xiǎn)的美國(guó)民眾每周將減收600美元。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

目前,除了各州發(fā)放的失業(yè)救助金之外,失業(yè)的美國(guó)民眾每周都會(huì)從聯(lián)邦政府那里額外收到600美元的失業(yè)救助金。但這項(xiàng)來(lái)自于《冠狀病毒援助、救濟(jì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)安全法案》(CARES Act)的福利將于7月底到期,除非聯(lián)邦政府能延長(zhǎng)其期限。

一旦聯(lián)邦失業(yè)救助金消失后,1950萬(wàn)領(lǐng)取失業(yè)保險(xiǎn)的美國(guó)民眾每周將減收600美元,一個(gè)月就是2400美元。這一情況不僅會(huì)讓眾多家庭陷入入不敷出的困境,同時(shí)也可能會(huì)讓經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇號(hào)列車偏離軌道。

Moody’s Analytics的首席經(jīng)濟(jì)師馬克·贊迪說(shuō):“如果失業(yè)保險(xiǎn)救助金戛然而止,我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)會(huì)再次陷入衰退。”他認(rèn)為數(shù)據(jù)顯示,按照當(dāng)前的情況來(lái)看,衰退已經(jīng)在5月底結(jié)束,但如果完全取消每周額外的600美元失業(yè)救助金,尤其是眼下美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生事件再次惡化,那么經(jīng)濟(jì)很有可能會(huì)因此而再度萎縮。“這些人將無(wú)力支付其賬單,并停止消費(fèi),從而導(dǎo)致整個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)走下坡路。”

《財(cái)富》雜志在分析了美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)分析局的收入數(shù)據(jù)后發(fā)現(xiàn),僅5月一個(gè)月,每周額外600美元的失業(yè)救助金就讓人們的收入增加了約700億美元,比八個(gè)州的GDP總和還要多。

說(shuō)到GDP:國(guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室6月的報(bào)告稱,如果這些福利能夠延續(xù)到年底,那么2020年下半年的家庭支出和GDP很有可能會(huì)攀升。左派的經(jīng)濟(jì)政策研究所稱,如果能夠延續(xù)到2021年中期,那么季度平均GDP 將提振3.7個(gè)百分點(diǎn)。

然而,國(guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室在同一篇報(bào)告中指出,如果600美元的額外收入得以充分延期的話,那么有可能降低就業(yè)率。原因何在?因?yàn)閲?guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室發(fā)現(xiàn),六分之五的失業(yè)救助金領(lǐng)取人在下半年獲得的救助金將高于其在工作中拿到的周薪。因此,豐厚的救助金可能會(huì)放緩一些員工回歸工作的步伐,繼而拖累經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇。

至少參議院共和黨是這么認(rèn)為的,他們反對(duì)將600美元的救助金計(jì)劃進(jìn)行延期,并阻止了民主黨在眾議院通過(guò)3萬(wàn)億美元的救助方案,其中包括將救助金延至2021年1月。

巴德學(xué)院的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)副教授帕芙琳那·特切內(nèi)瓦說(shuō):“這些福利為即將崩塌的經(jīng)濟(jì)提供了一個(gè)支撐。這是在保護(hù)或補(bǔ)救經(jīng)濟(jì)方面所能做的最低限度保障工作。如果拿掉這部分救助金,基本上就是放任大壩的決堤。”帕芙琳那是最近出版的《工作保障案例》(The Case for a Job Guarantee)一書的作者,她支持將救助金計(jì)劃延期到年底。

如果放任這筆救助金消失,我們可能會(huì)看到來(lái)之不易的經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇也將成為明日黃花。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Feb

目前,除了各州發(fā)放的失業(yè)救助金之外,失業(yè)的美國(guó)民眾每周都會(huì)從聯(lián)邦政府那里額外收到600美元的失業(yè)救助金。但這項(xiàng)來(lái)自于《冠狀病毒援助、救濟(jì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)安全法案》(CARES Act)的福利將于7月底到期,除非聯(lián)邦政府能延長(zhǎng)其期限。

一旦聯(lián)邦失業(yè)救助金消失后,1950萬(wàn)領(lǐng)取失業(yè)保險(xiǎn)的美國(guó)民眾每周將減收600美元,一個(gè)月就是2400美元。這一情況不僅會(huì)讓眾多家庭陷入入不敷出的困境,同時(shí)也可能會(huì)讓經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇號(hào)列車偏離軌道。

Moody’s Analytics的首席經(jīng)濟(jì)師馬克·贊迪說(shuō):“如果失業(yè)保險(xiǎn)救助金戛然而止,我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)會(huì)再次陷入衰退。”他認(rèn)為數(shù)據(jù)顯示,按照當(dāng)前的情況來(lái)看,衰退已經(jīng)在5月底結(jié)束,但如果完全取消每周額外的600美元失業(yè)救助金,尤其是眼下美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生事件再次惡化,那么經(jīng)濟(jì)很有可能會(huì)因此而再度萎縮。“這些人將無(wú)力支付其賬單,并停止消費(fèi),從而導(dǎo)致整個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)走下坡路。”

《財(cái)富》雜志在分析了美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)分析局的收入數(shù)據(jù)后發(fā)現(xiàn),僅5月一個(gè)月,每周額外600美元的失業(yè)救助金就讓人們的收入增加了約700億美元,比八個(gè)州的GDP總和還要多。

說(shuō)到GDP:國(guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室6月的報(bào)告稱,如果這些福利能夠延續(xù)到年底,那么2020年下半年的家庭支出和GDP很有可能會(huì)攀升。左派的經(jīng)濟(jì)政策研究所稱,如果能夠延續(xù)到2021年中期,那么季度平均GDP 將提振3.7個(gè)百分點(diǎn)。

然而,國(guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室在同一篇報(bào)告中指出,如果600美元的額外收入得以充分延期的話,那么有可能降低就業(yè)率。原因何在?因?yàn)閲?guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室發(fā)現(xiàn),六分之五的失業(yè)救助金領(lǐng)取人在下半年獲得的救助金將高于其在工作中拿到的周薪。因此,豐厚的救助金可能會(huì)放緩一些員工回歸工作的步伐,繼而拖累經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇。

至少參議院共和黨是這么認(rèn)為的,他們反對(duì)將600美元的救助金計(jì)劃進(jìn)行延期,并阻止了民主黨在眾議院通過(guò)3萬(wàn)億美元的救助方案,其中包括將救助金延至2021年1月。

巴德學(xué)院的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)副教授帕芙琳那·特切內(nèi)瓦說(shuō):“這些福利為即將崩塌的經(jīng)濟(jì)提供了一個(gè)支撐。這是在保護(hù)或補(bǔ)救經(jīng)濟(jì)方面所能做的最低限度保障工作。如果拿掉這部分救助金,基本上就是放任大壩的決堤。”帕芙琳那是最近出版的《工作保障案例》(The Case for a Job Guarantee)一書的作者,她支持將救助金計(jì)劃延期到年底。

如果放任這筆救助金消失,我們可能會(huì)看到來(lái)之不易的經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇也將成為明日黃花。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Feb

Jobless Americans are receiving an extra $600 per week in unemployment benefits from the federal government on top of their state benefits. But that extra $600 benefit set aside from the CARES Act expires at the end of July unless the federal government extends it.

Once that federal unemployment bonus is gone, the 19.5 million Americans actively receiving unemployment insurance would see a $600 weekly—or $2,400 monthly—pay cut. Not only will that translate into many households not being able to make ends meet, but it could also derail the economic recovery.

"The economy going back into recession is likely if we cold-turkey cut the extra unemployment insurance benefits," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics. He thinks the data will show that on the current trajectory the recession ended in May, but a complete phaseout of the $600 extra weekly unemployment benefits—in a country where COVID-19 cases are rising again—would likely pull the economy back into contraction. "They'd stop paying their bills and stop spending, and [it would] kick the whole economy down."

The extra $600 weekly unemployment benefits boosted incomes by around $70 billion in the month of May alone, according to Fortune's analysis of U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis income data. That's larger than the gross domestic product (GDP) of eight states.

And speaking of GDP: If the benefits are extended through the end of the year, it is likely that GDP and household spending would be greater in the second half of 2020, according to a June report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). And if extended through the middle of 2021, it would increase average quarterly GDP by 3.7%, according to the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute.

However, if the extra $600 payments are fully extended it would likely lower employment, according to the same CBO report. How so? Around five in six unemployment benefit recipients would get weekly payouts in the second half of the year greater than what they'd expect to make working, the CBO finds. So the generous benefits could deter some workers from returning to jobs and slow down the recovery.

At least that's the thinking of Senate Republicans who are opposed to extending the $600 benefits and blocked a $3 trillion relief package passed by Democrats in the House, which included an extension of the benefits through January 2021.

"Those benefits put a floor on the collapsing economy. It's the minimum of what's necessary to protect or Band-Aid the economy. If removed, it is essentially letting the dam break," says Pavlina Tcherneva, an associate professor of economics at Bard College and author of the recently published book The Case for a Job Guarantee. She supports extending the benefits through the end of the year.

Allow them to disappear, and we may see the hard-won economic gains we've made disappear too.

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開

            主站蜘蛛池模板: 饶平县| 五原县| 象州县| 德钦县| 南阳市| 红安县| 虎林市| 台北县| 正蓝旗| 砀山县| 临江市| 濮阳市| 石嘴山市| 新营市| 巴中市| 汝南县| 红安县| 巴塘县| 视频| 同心县| 吉木乃县| 三穗县| 江安县| 祁东县| 北川| 大埔县| 宁津县| 大城县| 沙河市| 合江县| 社旗县| 江孜县| 双牌县| 琼海市| 搜索| 桐柏县| 昌平区| 曲麻莱县| 大悟县| 通化市| 阜宁县|