美國股市可能剛剛經(jīng)歷了33年來最糟糕的一個(gè)季度,但如果投資者能謹(jǐn)慎選股,仍可以避免遭受重大損失。
比如在選擇增長股還是價(jià)值股的老問題上,投資者或許能夠找到一絲安慰。據(jù)Alger資產(chǎn)管理公司的研究顯示,自今年年初以來,兩類股票差距顯著拉大,增長股正不斷走強(qiáng)。
Alger公司指出,自去年年底以來,羅素1000增長指數(shù)的表現(xiàn)超過了羅素1000價(jià)值指數(shù)和標(biāo)普500指數(shù)。而自今年2月中旬美股因?yàn)樾鹿谝咔殚_始直線跳水以來,這種差異變得更加明顯。盡管下跌幅度巨大,但今年到目前為止,該增長指數(shù)僅下跌18%。相比之下,價(jià)值指數(shù)下挫31%,標(biāo)普500指數(shù)則下跌了24%。
這家投資公司當(dāng)前的投資策略以關(guān)注增長股為主,它指出了兩極分化背后的幾個(gè)因素。其一是低利率對(duì)金融板塊的影響,這些股票通常屬于價(jià)值股,并被編入價(jià)值指數(shù)計(jì)算。此外,全球貿(mào)易放緩阻礙了“商品自由流動(dòng)”,進(jìn)而影響到價(jià)值股的表現(xiàn),因?yàn)閮r(jià)值股“往往經(jīng)營汽車、器材等實(shí)體商品”,而以科技為主導(dǎo)的成長股“一般集中在數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域”。
Alger公司還指出,成長股的資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表通常更加健康,這對(duì)于“經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)蕩時(shí)期的生存至關(guān)重要”,在經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退時(shí)投資這些股票也較為安全。據(jù)該公司的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,價(jià)值股在前兩次美國經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退時(shí)平均收益下降40%,但增長股的收益“相對(duì)穩(wěn)健”。
當(dāng)然一些觀察人士認(rèn)為,在做出投資決策時(shí),特別是在考察這兩種股票的指數(shù)時(shí),“增長股”和“價(jià)值股”的劃分其實(shí)把問題過于簡單化了。
嘉信理財(cái)公司首席投資策略師莉茲·安·松德斯在接受《財(cái)富》采訪時(shí)表示,關(guān)鍵要看近期哪些板塊和行業(yè)的表現(xiàn)優(yōu)于市場平均,而目前科技和醫(yī)藥概念板塊明顯好于金融板塊。
松德斯認(rèn)為:“成長型股票的表現(xiàn)優(yōu)于(價(jià)值型股票),主要是因?yàn)橐恍┌鍓K的表現(xiàn)更強(qiáng)勁??萍脊珊歪t(yī)藥股恰好在增長指數(shù)中占據(jù)了主導(dǎo)。反觀價(jià)值指數(shù)的權(quán)重股是金融類股票,它們已經(jīng)被市場環(huán)境壓垮了?!?/p>
松德斯還說,在如此動(dòng)蕩的市場環(huán)境下,投資者必須精心挑選個(gè)股,而不是盲目追逐某些被看好的細(xì)分市場“標(biāo)簽”。她表示:“我們一直在告誡投資者,如果想成為選股專家,就應(yīng)該關(guān)注穩(wěn)定而高質(zhì)量的收益增長,同時(shí)也要保持價(jià)值思維。在當(dāng)前環(huán)境下,關(guān)鍵是要精挑細(xì)選,采取主動(dòng)而不是被動(dòng)的投資策略?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:智竑
美國股市可能剛剛經(jīng)歷了33年來最糟糕的一個(gè)季度,但如果投資者能謹(jǐn)慎選股,仍可以避免遭受重大損失。
比如在選擇增長股還是價(jià)值股的老問題上,投資者或許能夠找到一絲安慰。據(jù)Alger資產(chǎn)管理公司的研究顯示,自今年年初以來,兩類股票差距顯著拉大,增長股正不斷走強(qiáng)。
Alger公司指出,自去年年底以來,羅素1000增長指數(shù)的表現(xiàn)超過了羅素1000價(jià)值指數(shù)和標(biāo)普500指數(shù)。而自今年2月中旬美股因?yàn)樾鹿谝咔殚_始直線跳水以來,這種差異變得更加明顯。盡管下跌幅度巨大,但今年到目前為止,該增長指數(shù)僅下跌18%。相比之下,價(jià)值指數(shù)下挫31%,標(biāo)普500指數(shù)則下跌了24%。
這家投資公司當(dāng)前的投資策略以關(guān)注增長股為主,它指出了兩極分化背后的幾個(gè)因素。其一是低利率對(duì)金融板塊的影響,這些股票通常屬于價(jià)值股,并被編入價(jià)值指數(shù)計(jì)算。此外,全球貿(mào)易放緩阻礙了“商品自由流動(dòng)”,進(jìn)而影響到價(jià)值股的表現(xiàn),因?yàn)閮r(jià)值股“往往經(jīng)營汽車、器材等實(shí)體商品”,而以科技為主導(dǎo)的成長股“一般集中在數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域”。
Alger公司還指出,成長股的資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表通常更加健康,這對(duì)于“經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)蕩時(shí)期的生存至關(guān)重要”,在經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退時(shí)投資這些股票也較為安全。據(jù)該公司的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,價(jià)值股在前兩次美國經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退時(shí)平均收益下降40%,但增長股的收益“相對(duì)穩(wěn)健”。
當(dāng)然一些觀察人士認(rèn)為,在做出投資決策時(shí),特別是在考察這兩種股票的指數(shù)時(shí),“增長股”和“價(jià)值股”的劃分其實(shí)把問題過于簡單化了。
嘉信理財(cái)公司首席投資策略師莉茲·安·松德斯在接受《財(cái)富》采訪時(shí)表示,關(guān)鍵要看近期哪些板塊和行業(yè)的表現(xiàn)優(yōu)于市場平均,而目前科技和醫(yī)藥概念板塊明顯好于金融板塊。
松德斯認(rèn)為:“成長型股票的表現(xiàn)優(yōu)于(價(jià)值型股票),主要是因?yàn)橐恍┌鍓K的表現(xiàn)更強(qiáng)勁??萍脊珊歪t(yī)藥股恰好在增長指數(shù)中占據(jù)了主導(dǎo)。反觀價(jià)值指數(shù)的權(quán)重股是金融類股票,它們已經(jīng)被市場環(huán)境壓垮了?!?/p>
松德斯還說,在如此動(dòng)蕩的市場環(huán)境下,投資者必須精心挑選個(gè)股,而不是盲目追逐某些被看好的細(xì)分市場“標(biāo)簽”。她表示:“我們一直在告誡投資者,如果想成為選股專家,就應(yīng)該關(guān)注穩(wěn)定而高質(zhì)量的收益增長,同時(shí)也要保持價(jià)值思維。在當(dāng)前環(huán)境下,關(guān)鍵是要精挑細(xì)選,采取主動(dòng)而不是被動(dòng)的投資策略。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:智竑
The stock market may have just had its worst quarter in 33 years, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t pockets of the market where investors can insulate themselves from all the damage.
The age-old debate between growth stocks and value stocks, for instance, is one area in which investors may be able to find some solace. According to equity investment firm Alger Management, the disparity between the two categories has grown markedly since the beginning of this year—with growth stocks coming out on top.
As Alger notes, the Russell 1000 growth index has outperformed both the Russell 1000 value index and the S&P 500 since the end of last year, with that divergence becoming more pronounced since the stock market began its coronavirus-related swan dive in mid-February. While having still fallen steeply, the growth index has lost only 18% this year to date, compared to a 31% drop in the value index and a 24% decline for the S&P 500.
The investment manager—which focuses its investment strategy on growth equities—points to a few factors behind the dichotomy. Those include the impact of lower interest rates on financial sector stocks, which are usually categorized as value stocks and tracked by value indexes. Alger also notes how a slowdown in global trade has hindered the “free flow of goods” and hurt value stocks, which “tend to deal more in tangible items, such as autos and equipment.” By contrast, more tech-oriented growth stocks “tend to operate in more of a digital economy.”
Alger adds that growth stocks tend to have healthier balance sheets, which are “critical to surviving economic tumult” and make them safer bets in recessionary conditions. According to the firm, while value stock earnings declined 40% on average in the previous two U.S. economic recessions, growth stock earnings “were relatively flat.”
Of course, some observers believe it is reductive to delineate simply between “growth” and “value” stocks when making investment decisions—and particularly so when considering indexes tracking both types of stocks.
As Charles Schwab chief investment strategist Liz Ann Sonders tells Fortune, it’s more about which sectors and industries have been outperforming the market as of late—with tech and health care stocks outstripping the likes of financials.
“I think the main reason growth stocks have been outperforming [value stocks] has had to do with which sectors have been outperforming,” Sonders says. “That’s tech and health care, and they happen to dominate the growth indexes—whereas the value indexes’ biggest weight is financials, and they’ve gotten crushed because of the environment.”
Sonders adds that in such volatile market conditions, it's important for investors to be particular about the stocks they invest in, rather than fall back on the “l(fā)abeling” ascribed to certain segments of the market that are deemed good bets.
“We’ve been telling investors that if you’re a stock picker, you want to look at stability and quality in earnings growth, but also have a value mindset,” she says. “This is an environment where being particular and taking an active, rather than passive, approach is important.”