滴滴遭遇危機,Uber近況如何?
達拉·科斯羅薩西離開艾派迪公司,接替特拉維斯·卡拉尼克成為Uber的首席執行官后,他為Uber的一系列可能致命的商業失誤承擔了責任,保持了公司的高速增長,并且積極準備推動公司上市。當時的Uber已經成了政府、競爭對手、員工和客戶的眾矢之的,很多人都在質疑它的道德水平。 在多數人看來,科斯羅薩西這次跳槽無異于職業上的自殺。但科斯羅薩西卻向我們證明,道德的勇氣和戰略的權衡確實能推動企業績效的提高。在這個過程中,他打破了企業的慣例,在三個關鍵領域進行了改革。 尊重監管機構 在這方面,最典型的一個例子是他與倫敦政府打交道的經歷。2017年9月,也就是在他任職CEO后不久,倫敦市政府吊銷了Uber的營業執照,理由是該公司工作條件不達標,且對一起性侵案件隱瞞不報。到2018年6月,科斯羅薩西終于讓法庭相信,Uber正在翻開嶄新的一頁,使法庭批準Uber繼續在倫敦運營18個月,以觀后效。 倫敦交通部門主管授予執照的官員似乎對Uber的新策略頗為滿意,他在聽證會上表示:“如果一個運營商請求的是許可,而不是請求原諒,那么在申領證照的過程中,肯定效果會更好。” 另一個例子,是他對公司的UberPOP服務的立場變化。UberPOP是該公司在歐洲推出的一檔廉價網絡叫車服務,類似于美國的UberX。前幾年,包括西班牙、德國在內的歐洲各國禁止了UberPOP,理由是它違規使用了不專業的司機。 Uber沒有跟這些國家的監管機構硬剛,而是采取了更加順從的立場,不再呼吁在德國恢復UberPOP服務,而是計劃在巴塞羅納推出一項新的UberX服務,該服務的司機均有合法授權。Uber公司的南歐地區負責人表示,公司已經在一篇博客文章中承認了此前的錯誤。 這位負責人寫道:“我們正在改變我們做生意的模式,將誠實作為每個決策的核心,努力獲得合作城市的信任。” 即便是在網民討論得火熱的飛行汽車問題上,科斯羅薩西也表示,Uber“將按照規則來”。 收編競爭對手 面對行業內的競爭對手,Uber也采取了一種非對抗性的方式。谷歌母公司曾狀告Uber竊取了其子公司Waymo研發的自動駕駛技術,2018年2月,Uber與Alphabet就此案達成和解。Uber表示將不會使用Waymo的自動駕駛技術,并向Alphbet贈予了Uber公司0.34%的股權。Uber還對此事演變到如此地步表示了遺憾。這起案件如此收場,是非常了不起的,在公司面臨很多其他復雜問題的情況下,此案的成功和解為Uber平息了很多負面報道和干擾。 Uber在海外市場也同樣采取了降低對抗的策略。比如該公司戰略性地從東南亞和俄羅斯撤出,以換取競爭對手Grab和Yandex的股權。與此同時,Uber繼續在巴西和印度展開競爭。這種戰略決策表明,Uber不再僅僅關注增長和壟斷全世界,而是終于開始關注利潤問題了。 文化變革 此外,Uber還發生了其他一些變化,但在硅谷以外,這些變化就不那么引人關注了,不過它們對建設一家長久發展的公司卻是至關重要的。比如Uber一度也曾盛行硅谷臭名昭著的“男程序員”文化,公司往往對性騷擾和種族歧視視若罔聞,工作中盛行“唯結果論”。結果到2017年3月,Uber的全球員工只有36%是女性。而在技術團隊中,更是僅有15%是女性。 通過在艾派迪公司的工作經歷,科斯羅薩西深知多元化對科技公司的重要性。他開始積極征詢Uber員工的意見建議,以改革公司的內部文化。就此,公司先后成立了20多個員工組織,提交了1200余條意見建議,投了22000多張票。在此基礎上,他重新編寫了一套企業的文化規范。現在,科斯羅薩西不再鼓勵“沖刺式”發展,而是強調“我們要做正確的事情”,“鼓勵差異”,“創意高于等級”。從語言入手,改變企業的文化規范,標志著Uber向著改革自身文化邁出了積極的一步。 在“文化革命”的同時,科斯羅薩西還對高管團隊進行了“大清洗”。去年,Uber的原人力總監、產品總監和其他幾個高管相繼離職。卡拉尼克時代遺留的16名高管中,目前只有7位仍然留在公司。 下一步? 科斯羅薩西已經帶領Uber打開了局面,但他的改革仍未完成,科技界離徹底消滅性別歧視、種族歧視依然任重道遠,Uber與監管機構的齟齬也沒有完全解決。本月初,紐約市投票通過一項決定,一年內將暫停頒發新的網絡叫車服務執照,在此期間,紐約市有關部門將對交通擁堵問題進行研究。與此同時,Uber也必須應對競爭局面的快速變化,想辦法在無人駕駛技術、電動自行車和無人飛行器的圍剿中殺出一條生路。 我們對科斯羅薩西還是應該報有希望的。2015年2月,他還是艾派迪公司CEO時,就曾在領英上寫過這樣一段話:“只要勇于承擔巨大風險,再有一支你信任且也信任你的團隊,即便是方寸之局,也能贏得長久勝利。” (財富中文網) 本文作者Tim J. Smith是Wiglaf Pricing公司CEO、德保羅大學市場營銷學客座教授,也是《Pricing Done Right》一書的作者。 譯者:樸成奎 |
When Dara Khosrowshahi left Expedia to take over for Travis Kalanick as CEO of Uber, he assumed responsibility for resolving a series of potentially fatal business missteps, maintaining high growth, and preparing the company to go public. Uber was in the crosshairs of governments, competitors, employees, and customers, with many questioning its morals. For most, this would have been career suicide. For Khosrowshahi, it has been an opportunity to demonstrate that moral courage and strategic tradeoffs can drive improved performance. In doing so, he broke past corporate norms and brought reform in three key areas. Respecting regulators Khosrowshahi’s approach to addressing government challenges is typified with his handling of London. In September 2017, shortly after Khosrowshahi assumed the helm, London canceled Uber’s operating license, citing inadequate working conditions and failures to report sexual assault. By June 2018, Khosrowshahi had provisionally convinced the courts that Uber was turning over a new leaf, winning a conditional license to continue operating for 18 months. The director of licensing for London’s transportation agency seemed pleased with Uber’s new tack, saying during the hearing that the licensing process “certainly works better when an operator is asking permission rather than seeking forgiveness.” Another instance of the new CEO’s change in tack is the company’s changed stance on UberPOP, essentially a low-cost ride-hailing option in Europe similar to UberX in the U.S. Over the last few years, European countries like Spain and Germany banned UberPOP, arguing that it illegally used non-professional drivers. Now Uber has taken a more compliant position, dropping its appeal to restore UberPOP service in Germany and planning to initiate a new UberX service in Barcelona with licensed drivers. Uber’s director for Southwest Europe acknowledged the company’s previous mistakes in a blog post accompanying the latter announcement. “We are changing the way we do business,” he wrote, “putting integrity at the core of every decision we make and working hard to earn the trust of the cities in which we operate.” Even when it comes to flying cars, Khosrowshahi has declared Uber will “play by the rules.” Co-opting competitors Uber has taken a similarly non-combative approach with its industry cohorts. In February 2018, Uber settled a lawsuit with Alphabet, Google’s parent company, over allegations that Uber had stolen autonomous vehicle technology developed by Waymo, another Alphabet subsidiary. Uber pledged not to use Waymo’s autonomous vehicle technology, gave Alphabet a 0.34% equity stake in Uber, and expressed regrets over how the situation was handled. Settling the suit was a great move, as it quelled bad press and distraction at a time when many other issues need to be addressed at the company. Such de-escalation is also visible in Uber’s approach to competitors in foreign markets. The company strategically retreated from Southeast Asia and Russia in exchange for equity stakes in competitors Grab and Yandex, respectively. Uber continues to compete in Brazil and India, but this kind of a strategic decision-making demonstrates that Uber is no longer focused solely on growth and world domination. It may even be finally focused on profits. etting the house in order Other changes may be less noticeable outside of Silicon Valley, but are nonetheless significant in creating a company that will endure. Uber suffered from Silicon Valley’s immoral “brogrammer” culture, where a blind eye was often turned to sexual harassment and racial discrimination, and arrogance and winning at all costs ruled. The inattention to creating an inclusive workplace resulted in only 36% of Uber’s worldwide employees being female as of March 2017. In addition, only 15% of its technical team were women. Khosrowshahi was well aware of the challenges of diversity in technology from his time at Expedia. He started to fix the internal culture by soliciting feedback from Uber employees. Two dozen employee focus groups, 1,200 submitted ideas, and 22,000 votes later, he scripted a new set of cultural norms. Now, instead of encouraging stepping on toes, Uber has adopted mantras such as “We do the right thing. Period,” “We celebrate differences,” and “We value ideas over hierarchy.” Changing the language of cultural norms is a positive step toward changing Uber’s culture itself. Along with cultural change, Khosrowshahi has also cleansed the executive ranks. The chief of human resources, chief product officer, and several others departed in the last year. Overall, of the 16 executives running Uber when Kalanick left, only seven remain at the company. What’s next Khosrowshahi has had an auspicious start at Uber, but his reformation is incomplete. The goal of a level playing field for women and minorities in technology remains distant. Uber’s challenges with regulators are not fully resolved; earlier this month, New York City voted to freeze the distribution of new ride-hailing vehicle licenses for one year while it studies traffic congestion. And Uber must address the fast-moving competitive frontier in transportation, from autonomous vehicles to electric bikes and to autonomous flying machines. We can take hope in Khosrowshahi’s own words. In February 2015, while he was still head of Expedia, Khosrowshahi wrote on LinkedIn, “Taking big risks combined with having a team you believe in and that believes just as much in you as a leader make for long-term wins even in a game of inches.” Tim J. Smith is the founder and CEO of Wiglaf Pricing and an adjunct professor of Marketing at DePaul University, and the author of Pricing Done Right. |