????但奇怪的是，雖然該行似乎承認了導致交易損失的問題，但它的董事會并沒有出現任何顯著變化。過去，該行曾表示，監督旗下交易頭寸并非董事會的職責。但在與貨幣監理署達成的和解中，監管機構似乎將該行董事會列為存在問題之一，并且也同意進行整改。

????不過，維權股東普賴斯-瓊斯說，若摩根大通董事會不出現新面孔，任何措施都不夠。普賴斯-瓊斯說：“摩根大通需要得力的董事，這些董事應該具備提出問題、化解質疑的專長。它目前顯然沒有這樣的董事會。”（財富中文網）

????But at a time when the bank seems to be owning up to problems that led to the trading losses, it seems odd that no significant changes are being made to its board. In the past the bank has said that it wasn't the board's job to oversee the trading positions of the bank. But in the settlement with the OCC, regulators seemed to point to the board as one of the problems, and the bank agreed to make changes.

????Shareholder activist Pryce-Jones, though, says anything short of new faces on JPMorgan's board won't be enough. "JPMorgan needs a board with strong directors with the knowledge to ask questions and push back," says Pryce-Jones. "That's clearly not the case with this group."