精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清,国产精品成人久久久久,国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍


 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
Google woos publishers from Apple with 10% One Pass cut
作者: Seth Weintraub    時間: 2011年02月18日    來源: 財富中文網
 位置:專欄         
字體 [   ]        
打印         
發表評論        





????As Apple deals with a publisher backlash from its subscription plan offering, Google swooped in today to offer publishers a less expensive alternative that will work on more devices.

????Originally leaked last June as 'NewsPass' by an Italian newspaper, Google (GOOG) released details on its new One Pass publishing tool today. The timing is no coincidence as Apple (AAPL) is currently dealing with a publisher backlash over its newly-enforced 30% cut of publisher revenues in its popular App Store.

????Google is undercutting Apple and only taking 10% of the revenues across the board, according to a Google spokesperson.

????Although additional details are scant, the service portends to give publishers the choice of how they want to publish their work and what they want to charge. Google lists the following bullet points:

????? New revenue stream

????? Purchase-once, view-anywhere functionality

????? Ability to give access to existing subscribers

????? Lightweight technology implementation

????? Business model flexibility (e.g., subscriptions, day passes, metered access, pay-per-article, multi-issue packages)

????From the looks of One Pass, it isn't fully baked. Clicking on the "Sign Up" box sends me to a random help page. Clearly, Google is trying to take advantage of Apple's moves, but it appears to be moving a little too fast, if the signup function isn't even working yet. (Hey guys, try using a Google Docs form!)

????However, Google already has some big publishers signed up, including Bonnier/Popular Science, Media General, Inc., and Rust Communications/Southeast Missourian.

????I like this model much better than Apple's, which only works in one store on only Apple's devices. With Web/HTML5, publications can publish once and their content is instantly available on all platforms, including Apple's iOS devices. Publishers also get to keep a much larger portion of their revenues.

????The devil, however, will be in the details as we see what kind of product publishers can put out. HTML5 isn't as modern a framework for graphic design so it will be interesting to see what kind of visual experience Google can provide. We've already seen beautiful periodicals built for Apple's iPad and Google is traditionally light on its graphic interface capabilities.

????Google also offers to share customer information with publishers (but they say an opt-out exists), something Apple has promised not to do in its App Store.




相關閱讀
用戶名: 密碼:      匿名


0條評論          查看更多評論











            主站蜘蛛池模板: 丰城市| 寿光市| 遵义市| 永济市| 抚远县| 来宾市| 呈贡县| 海城市| 五台县| 喀什市| 翁源县| 青岛市| 梁山县| 阿拉尔市| 鹰潭市| 和硕县| 无为县| 遂宁市| 静乐县| 馆陶县| 六盘水市| 滦南县| 溧阳市| 庆元县| 嘉定区| 浦江县| 垣曲县| 柯坪县| 麻栗坡县| 长寿区| 奉贤区| 延边| 巨野县| 深泽县| 柘城县| 鲁甸县| 南汇区| 文成县| 罗山县| 区。| 兴安盟|