????強化電池。雖然科技界名人羅伯特·斯科布對谷歌眼鏡愛不釋手，聲稱自己的生活從此再也離不開它（或者說它至少是這個位置的有力競爭者）了，但有一點連他也感到遺憾——糟糕的電池續航能力。斯蒂文斯在獨立試用時發現，在適度使用情況下，比如閱讀電子郵件和拍攝視頻短篇等，谷歌眼鏡的電池可以堅持約五個小時。而作為一款移動設備，不論怎么看這都有些差強人意。

????售價必須控制在一千美元以內。價格最好不要高于500美元。當然，這確實是第一件可穿戴計算設備，但既然蘋果可以將第一代16G iPad定為499美元，為什么谷歌不能呢？最佳價位應該是多少呢？斯科布在評論中的建議是200美元。

????增加錄像指示器。雖然谷歌眼鏡目前的工業設計算不上精細，不過有一點是它嚴重缺乏的，那就是一款指示燈，使佩戴者周圍的人能夠知道有人正在拍攝他們的照片或影像。比如斯蒂文斯建議，可以增加與小型LED燈類似的裝置，使得在拍照或錄像時，其他人能夠知道。這樣一來，谷歌還可以避免更大的麻煩：公眾對于隱私問題的嚴重抗議。（財富中文網）

????《財富》雜志（Fortune）的讀者朋友，你們認為還有哪些其他特性是谷歌眼鏡必須要具備的？歡迎評論。

????

????譯者：劉進龍/汪皓

????Beef up the battery. Although tech influencer Robert Scoble loved Glass so much he declared he would never live another day of his life without it (or at least a comparable competitor) one of the few things he did lament was poor battery life. Independently, Stevens found that with moderate use like reading emails and taking short videos, he managed about five hours before Glass died on him. For a mobile device, that's pretty mediocre however you look at it.

????Keep it under a grand. Better yet, price it $500 or less. It's the first in a new wave of computing devices sure, but if Apple could peg the first-generation 16-gigabyte iPad at $499, we think Google can too. The sweet spot? $200, Scoble suggested in his review.

????Toss in a recording indicator. While Glass' current industrial design may be anything but subtle, the one thing it's sorely lacking is an indicator that lets people around the Glass wearer know their photo is being taken or they're being captured on video. Toss in something -- like say, a small LED light, as Stevens suggests -- that lets others know when this is happening, and Google could head off something much bigger: a public outcry over privacy.

????What other make-or-break features would you like to see make it into Google Glass, Fortune readers? Weigh in below.